Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111613.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11613.

Analysis of Delayed Surgical Treatment and Oncologic Outcomes in Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Affiliations

Analysis of Delayed Surgical Treatment and Oncologic Outcomes in Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Brendan T Heiden et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: The association between delayed surgical treatment and oncologic outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is poorly understood given that prior studies have used imprecise definitions for the date of cancer diagnosis.

Objective: To use a uniform method to quantify surgical treatment delay and to examine its association with several oncologic outcomes.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using a novel data set from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system. Included patients had clinical stage I NSCLC and were undergoing resection from 2006 to 2016 within the VHA system. Time to surgical treatment (TTS) was defined as the time between preoperative diagnostic computed tomography imaging and surgical treatment. We evaluated the association between TTS and several delay-associated outcomes using restricted cubic spline functions. Data analyses were performed in November 2021.

Exposure: Wait time between cancer diagnosis and surgical treatment (ie, TTS).

Main outcomes and measures: Several delay-associated oncologic outcomes, including pathologic upstaging, resection with positive margins, and recurrence, were assessed. We also assessed overall survival.

Results: Among 9904 patients who underwent surgical treatment for clinical stage I NSCLC, 9539 (96.3%) were men, 4972 individuals (50.5%) were currently smoking, and the mean (SD) age was 67.7 (7.9) years. The mean (SD) TTS was 70.1 (38.6) days. TTS was not associated with increased risk of pathologic upstaging or positive margins. Recurrence was detected in 4158 patients (42.0%) with median (interquartile range) follow-up of 6.15 (2.51-11.51) years. Factors associated with increased risk of recurrence included younger age (hazard ratio [HR] for every 1-year increase in age, 0.992; 95% CI, 0.987-0.997; P = .003), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (HR for every 1-unit increase in composite score, 1.055; 95% CI, 1.037-1.073; P < .001), segmentectomy (HR vs lobectomy, 1.352; 95% CI, 1.179-1.551; P < .001) or wedge resection (HR vs lobectomy, 1.282; 95% CI, 1.179-1.394; P < .001), larger tumor size (eg, 31-40 mm vs <10 mm; HR, 1.209; 95% CI, 1.051-1.390; P = .008), higher tumor grade (eg, II vs I; HR, 1.210; 95% CI, 1.085-1.349; P < .001), lower number of lymph nodes examined (eg, ≥10 vs <10; HR, 0.866; 95% CI, 0.803-0.933; P < .001), higher pathologic stage (III vs I; HR, 1.571; 95% CI, 1.351-1.837; P < .001), and longer TTS, with increasing risk after 12 weeks. For each week of surgical delay beyond 12 weeks, the hazard for recurrence increased by 0.4% (HR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.001-1.006; P = .002). Factors associated with delayed surgical treatment included African American race (odds ratio [OR] vs White race, 1.267; 95% CI, 1.112-1.444; P < .001), higher area deprivation index [ADI] score (OR for every 1 unit increase in ADI score, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.002-1.007; P = .002), lower hospital case load (OR for every 1-unit increase in case load, 0.998; 95% CI, 0.998-0.999; P = .001), and year of diagnosis, with less recent procedures more likely to have delay (OR for each additional year, 0.900; 95% CI, 0.884-0.915; P < .001). Patients with surgical treatment within 12 weeks of diagnosis had significantly better overall survival than those with procedures delayed more than 12 weeks (HR, 1.132; 95% CI, 1.064-1.204; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: Using a more precise definition for TTS, this study found that surgical procedures delayed more than 12 weeks were associated with increased risk of recurrence and worse survival. These findings suggest that patients with clinical stage I NSCLC should undergo expeditious treatment within that time frame.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Chang reported receiving grants from the US Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) during the conduct of the study. Dr Kreisel reported receiving personal fees from Compass Therapeutics outside the submitted work and having a patent pending entitled “Compositions and methods for detecting CCR2 receptors.” Dr Puri reported receiving consulting fees from PrecisCa outside the submitted work and ownership of stock in Intuitive Surgical by his spouse. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Quantifying Delayed Surgical Treatment by Clinical or Radiological Methods
This histogram presents RTTS (radiological time to surgical treatment; based on time between the date of diagnostic computed tomography imaging and surgical treatment) and CTTS (clinical time to surgical treatment; based on time between the date of diagnosis as previously coded in the Veterans Health Administration system and surgical treatment) for patients with clinical stage I non–small cell lung cancer.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Association Between Radiological Time to Surgical Treatment (RTTS) and Probability of Recurrence
Restricted cubic spline model presents the association between RTTS and the probability of recurrence.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Overall Survival Following Delayed Surgical Treatment
This Kaplan-Meier curve shows patients with clinical stage I non–small cell lung cancer with delayed (ie, >12 weeks radiological time to surgical treatment [RTTS]) vs nondelayed (≤12 weeks RTTS) surgical treatment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Puri V, Crabtree TD, Bell JM, et al. . Treatment outcomes in stage I lung cancer: a comparison of surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(12):1776-1784. doi:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000680 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. ; International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, Advisory Boards, and Participating Institutions; International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee Advisory Boards and Participating Institutions . The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(1):39-51. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network . Non-small cell lung cancer, version 6. NCCN Guidelines in Oncology. Accessed January 9, 2020. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1450
    1. Samson P, Patel A, Garrett T, et al. . Effects of delayed surgical resection on short-term and long-term outcomes in clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(6):1906-1912. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.022 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang CS, Hsu PK, Chen CK, Yeh YC, Shih CC, Huang BS. Delayed surgery after histologic or radiologic-diagnosed clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12(3):615-625. doi:10.21037/jtd.2019.12.123 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types