This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 1962 Feb:27:62-70.

doi: 10.1044/jshd.2701.62.

Revised CNC lists for auditory tests

G E PETERSON, I LEHISTE

PMID: 14485785
DOI: 10.1044/jshd.2701.62

Revised CNC lists for auditory tests

G E PETERSON et al. J Speech Hear Disord. 1962 Feb.

. 1962 Feb:27:62-70.

doi: 10.1044/jshd.2701.62.

Authors

G E PETERSON, I LEHISTE

PMID: 14485785
DOI: 10.1044/jshd.2701.62

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Factors influencing auditory perception of pure tones and speech.
FARRIMOND T. FARRIMOND T. J Speech Hear Res. 1962 Jun;5:194-204. doi: 10.1044/jshr.0502.194. J Speech Hear Res. 1962. PMID: 13891711 No abstract available.
Effect of simultaneous delayed and undelayed auditory feedback on speech.
CHASE RA, GUILFOYLE G. CHASE RA, et al. J Speech Hear Res. 1962 Jun;5:144-51. doi: 10.1044/jshr.0502.144. J Speech Hear Res. 1962. PMID: 13878361 No abstract available.
A comparative evaluation of the Maryland NU 6 auditory test.
Causey GD, Hermanson CL, Hood LJ, Bowling LS. Causey GD, et al. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983 Feb;48(1):62-9. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4801.62. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983. PMID: 6620995
Audiometry and other hearing tests.
Davies RA. Davies RA. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;137:157-76. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63437-5.00011-X. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016. PMID: 27638069 Review.
[Auditive function disturbances. Diagnostic orientation].
Dauman R. Dauman R. Rev Prat. 2002 Oct 15;52(16):1843-50. Rev Prat. 2002. PMID: 12564177 Review. French. No abstract available.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Strategic Pauses Relieve Listeners from the Effort of Listening to Fast Speech: Data Limited and Resource Limited Processes in Narrative Recall by Adult Users of Cochlear Implants.
O'Leary RM, Neukam J, Hansen TA, Kinney AJ, Capach N, Svirsky MA, Wingfield A. O'Leary RM, et al. Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231203514. doi: 10.1177/23312165231203514. Trends Hear. 2023. PMID: 37941344 Free PMC article.
Comparison of Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation in a Veteran Versus Nonveteran Population.
Tripathi SH, Adams SM, Wong EM, Petito G, Shapiro S, Grisel J, Breen J, Dhanda Patil R. Tripathi SH, et al. Otol Neurotol Open. 2024 Aug 12;4(3):e058. doi: 10.1097/ONO.0000000000000058. eCollection 2024 Sep. Otol Neurotol Open. 2024. PMID: 39328868 Free PMC article.
American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Children.
Warner-Czyz AD, Roland JT Jr, Thomas D, Uhler K, Zombek L. Warner-Czyz AD, et al. Ear Hear. 2022 Mar/Apr;43(2):268-282. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001087. Ear Hear. 2022. PMID: 35213891 Free PMC article.
Electrocochleography and cognition are important predictors of speech perception outcomes in noise for cochlear implant recipients.
Walia A, Shew MA, Kallogjeri D, Wick CC, Durakovic N, Lefler SM, Ortmann AJ, Herzog JA, Buchman CA. Walia A, et al. Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 23;12(1):3083. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07175-7. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35197556 Free PMC article.
Musical Sound Quality as a Function of the Number of Channels in Modern Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Berg K, Noble J, Dawant B, Dwyer R, Labadie R, Richards V, Gifford R. Berg K, et al. Front Neurosci. 2019 Sep 24;13:999. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00999. eCollection 2019. Front Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31607846 Free PMC article.

See all "Cited by" articles

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Atypon
Other Literature Sources
- The Lens - Patent Citations Database
Medical
- ClinicalTrials.gov