|
       |
|
Anthocharis s. sara
Lucas, 1852 |
|||
Type Specimens
|
Pinned Specimens
|
Pinned Specimens
|
|
|
|
|
Live Adults
photo
collection
|
|
Live Adults
photo
collection
|
Live Adults
photo
collection
|
Courtship
|
|
Courtship
|
|
Larval Foodplants
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Distribution and Larval Foodplants: |
|||
|
(From: A Catalogue of the Butterflies of the United States and Canada, Jonathan P. Pelham) Genus Anthocharis Boisduval, Rambur, [Duménil] & Graslin, [1833] Coll. icon. Hist. Chenilles Europ. (12): pl. Pap. 5; (13): 35. Type-species: Papilio cardamines Linnaeus, 1758, Syst. Nat. (ed. 10) 1: 468, no. 63, by monotypy.
Anthocharis sara Lucas, 1852
Anthocharis sara sara Lucas, 1852 Revue Mag. Zool. (2)4(7): 339-340. Original Combination: Anthocharis Sara Type Locality: “Californie”; defined as “Queen Lily Campground, near Belden, North Fork Feather River, 2400' elev., Plumas County, California” by J. Emmel et al. (1998), Syst. W. N. Am. Butts. (3): 79. Types: Lectotype in MNHP, designated by J. Emmel et al. (1998), Syst. W. N. Am. Butts. (3): 79, figs. 13 ♂ D, 14 ♂ V. = ‡sara Boisduval, 1852 Annls. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (2)10(2): 285-286, no. 11. Original Combination: Anthocharis sara Type Locality: “dans une grande partie de la Californie” Types: Syntypes in USNM. Preoccupied by Anthocharis sara Lucas, 1852, Revue Mag. Zool. (2)4(7): 339-340. = reakirtii W. H. Edwards, 1869 Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 2(4): 369; figured by W. H. Edwards (1868), Butts. N. Am. [1](2): pl. Anthocharis 1, figs. 1 ♂ D, 2 ♂ V, 3 ♀ D, 4 ♀ V. Original Combination: Anthocharis Reakirtii Type Locality: “California”; defined as “vicinity of San Francisco, California” by F. Brown (1973), Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 99(1): 39. Types: Lectotype in CMNH, designated by F. Brown (1973), Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 99(1): 40-41, fig. 4 ♂ D&V. = mollis W. G. Wright, 1905 Butts. W. Coast: 50, no. 67; 111, pl. 8, figs. 67 ♂ D (lectotype), 67b ♀ D. Original Combination: [Anthocharis Sara var.] Mollis; Anthocharis Mollis n. v. Type Locality: “Southern California” “Riche Canyon, S. Cal....San Diego County”; lectotype from “Riche Canyon,” believed to be “Reche Canyon, San Bernardino/Riverside counties” by Tilden (1975), Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. (118): 11. Types: Lectotype (#4286) in CAS, designated by Tilden (1975), Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. (118): 11. = dammersi J. A. Comstock, 1929 Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 28(2): 33, pl. 18 (holotype). Original Combination: Anthocharis dammersi Type Locality: “Whitewater Canyon, Riverside County, California” Types: Holotype in LACM; figured by Howe (1975), Butts. N. Am.: pl. 71, fig. 8 ♂ D&V. The holotype is apparently a hybrid between A. sara and A. lanceolata; see Shields and Mori (1979), J. Res. Lepid. 17(1): 53-55, fig. 1 ♂ D&V, and Scott (1982), J. Res. Lepid. 20(1): 61. = ‡”wrighti” J. A. Comstock, 1924 Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 23(2): 52; 24(2): pl. 11, fig. 16 ♂ D (“holotype”). Original Combination: Anthocharis reakirti ab. Wrighti Type Locality: “Chula Vista, California” Types: “Holotype” in SDMC. = ‡”sternitzkyi” Gunder, 1925 Entomol. News 36(1): 4, no. 6, pl. 1, fig. Q ♂ D (“holotype”). Original Combination: Anthocharis sara form reakirti ab. ♂ sternitzkyi Type Locality: “San Francisco, California” [San Francisco County] Types: “Holotype” in AMNH. = ‡”corcorani” Gunder, 1931 Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 30(2): 45. Original Combination: Anthocharis sara tr. f. corcorani Type Locality: “Griffith Park, Los Angeles, Calif.” [Los Angeles County, California] Types: “Holotype” in LACM. = ‡”broweri” Gunder, 1932 Pan-Pac. Entomol. 8(3): 124. Original Combination: Anthocharis sara race reakirti tr. f. broweri Type Locality: “Peanut Hill, Berkely Hills, Alameda County, California” Types: “Holotype” in AMNH. = ‡”flavicoloris” Gunder, [1934] Pan-Pac. Entomol. 9(4): 151-152. Original Combination: Anthocharis sara reakirtii tr. f. flavicoloris Type Locality: “Tocaloma, Marin County, California” Types: “Holotype” in AMNH. ‡”pallida” Scott, 1986 Butts. N. Am.: 212, no. 68. Original Combination: [Anthocharis sara] form pallida Proposed as a “form” with no nomenclatural standing; a nomen nudum. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Top of Page ● Main Page ● Reference Library ● Literature List ● Citation ● Interactive Listing |
|||
