reactive-programming
Here are 1,188 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Jun 23, 2020 - Dart
-
Updated
Jun 24, 2020 - Swift
MobX 6
Hi folks, I've tinkered a lot about MobX 6 lately, so I want to layout the vision I have currently
Goals
🧨 1. Become compatible with modern ES standards
Let's start with the elephant in the room.
I think we have to drop the support for decorators.
Some have been advocating this for years, others totally love decorators.
Personally I hate to let decorators go. I think
When I open any chapter, say ch01:
https://mostly-adequate.gitbooks.io/mostly-adequate-guide/content/ch01.html
Right chevron links to the current chapter header. I'd expect it to link to the next one.
Env:
MacOS
Desktop Chrome v79 (latest)
I haven't used Gitbook, but it might be solvable via GitBook update, also mentioned in #542
Docs revamp
As explained at CycleConf I will work (hopefully with the help of others) on the docs. It will be more a very long tutorial, like a book, starting simple, ending at #705
Planned chapters:
- Getting started (setting up a project)
- Streams
- First component
- Rendering static content
- Handling events
- Having local state
- Making our input controlled
-
Updated
Sep 17, 2019 - Java
Shared user guide
@mweststrate With 6.0 out now (
Red/System []
s2: declare struct! [
a [integer!]
b [c-string!]
c [struct! [d [integer!] e [float!]] value]
]
probe size? s2
Taken from https://static.red-lang.org/red-system-specs.html#section-4.7.2
Says:
Compiling to native code...
*** Red/System Compiler Internal Error: Script Error : last expected series argument of type: series port tuple
*** Where: for
The logged output does not match the example above.
For each i value, we should see something like i: 0 instead of just 0 for example.
-
Updated
May 22, 2020 - Swift
Hi! Thanks again for creating ReactiveSwift! I've searched around a bit online and can't find what I'm looking for.
The APIContracts used to include this best p
-
Updated
Jun 24, 2020 - JavaScript
The documentation explains pretty well why:
Wrap ALL of your components with view - including class and function ones - even if they don't seem to directly use a store.
I think it's pretty easy to miss adding this view hoc when you write hundred of components. My question is: Is there an eslint rule which exists to warn you that you forgot to add this extra view?
It could be nice to
Diamond flow
I think the documentation must include a note on the diamond flow and how xstream manage it, something like an explanation of atomic updates of flyd.
As well described by @staltz in this answer would be best to avoid diamond shaped stream graph:


Some of the issues below are already mentioned in other tickets, but I have the feeling that a proper generic issue is due to give it visibility, as for now the current package is unusable for many users.
I understand that meteor needs to control some compilation option