-
Updated
Sep 21, 2020 - Swift
networking
Here are 3,774 public repositories matching this topic...
Currently we use a pretty naive removal of testing dependencies for SwiftPM by setting an environment variable. We should be able to use Rocket and update our Rakefile
script to just remove testing dependencies on each release, and keep it in the development process thanks to that.
The idea came from this PR that I saw RxSwiftCommunity/RxOptional#83, which sounds reall
-
Updated
Sep 28, 2020 - Rust
-
Updated
Jul 10, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Sep 28, 2020 - Go
If you want to work with a complete socket address type including port, we have a helper in SocketAddress
. However, the moment you want to talk only about an IP address we force you to hold an in_addr
or in_addr6
structure: hardly the friendliest versions of these data types.
We should provide a helpful wrapper IPAddress
type that can be converted into those types as needed. This would
It would be useful to be able to toggle/flag into a process-level mode to group by pid and display more process-level information like the full command line.
- For the "Utilization by process name" window, we could group by pid rather than process name so that it's easier to find specific heavy network resource consumers.
- For the "Utilization by connection" window, including the pid + cmdlin
-
Updated
Sep 25, 2020 - C++
-
Updated
Jun 4, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Aug 22, 2020 - Java
-
Updated
Sep 26, 2020 - C++
-
Updated
Sep 20, 2020 - C
-
Updated
Sep 25, 2020 - Assembly
-
Updated
Sep 23, 2020 - Kotlin
-
Updated
Sep 14, 2020 - Swift
What should happen if deliver_cancel raises an exception? In the current implementation, the shielded cancel scope will prevent it from propagating until the process exits, which might take a while if the crash occurred before signaling the process in any way. Maybe on exception from a user-specified deliver_cancel we should call the default deliver_cancel to kill the process? Or just kill() since
-
Updated
Sep 21, 2020 - Go
We currently only test our autoscaling behavior for concurrency
and rps
. We should add an e2e test that also asserts we properly scale on `
-
Updated
Sep 7, 2020 - C++
-
Updated
May 24, 2020 - C#
-
Updated
Sep 10, 2020 - HTML
-
Updated
Sep 16, 2020 - Go
-
Updated
Jul 15, 2020 - C++
-
Updated
Sep 11, 2020 - Swift
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the networking topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the networking topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
Wanted to discuss this before opening a PR: is everyone okay with a bulk conversion from the old-style ASSERT macro to the new-style ASSERT_EQ, ASSERT_NE, etc. macros?
It'll cause a bit of churn in
test/
but it should make debugging tests a lot easier.