
Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
Our current organization of pytest configuration files is not optimal for locally running tests and could be improved to add flexibility and increase utility for both local and CI runs. Most of what follows are my personal issue with the current setup and ideas for how it could be improved. I would love to have a discussion on this topic and incorporate feedback from the team.
For some context, I first started looking at this when trying to use the
--run_stresscommands locally and ran into issues:~/Repos/rapids/cuml-dev2/python$ pytest --run_stress ERROR: usage: pytest [options] [file_or_dir] [file_or_dir] [...] pytest: error: unrecognized arguments: --run_stress inifile: /home/mdemoret/Repos/rapids/cuml-dev2/python/pytest.ini rootdir: /home/mdemoret/Repos/rapids/cuml-dev2/pythonThe way we currently have our repo organized is not recommended by pytest. They suggest moving the
conftest.pyfolder to the root of the python package or to create plugins sinceconftest.pydeeper in directories are not scanned initially. Given the growing nature of our currentconftest.py, growing number of tests, and need to adjust which tests are run, I think it makes sense to make the following changes:pytest_addoptionto plugins inpython/cuml/test/pluginsaddoptssection inpytest.ini(i.e.addopts = -p "cuml.test.plugins.custom_options_plugin")pytest.iniand rely less on command line arguments inci/gpu/build.sh--import-modeto--import-mode=importlibaddopts = -p "cuml.test.plugins.custom_options_plugin"work and will become the default. This also makes it easier during development since both local and pip installed packages can be resolved.conftest.pyto new pluginsbad_cuml_array_checkcould be a plugin which would make it disable-ableMaking these changes will allow us more flexibility when running pytest locally and in CI. I have already tested some of these out and they work well. For example, I added a memory checker plugin here, and also added a "quick_run" plugin here which reduces the number of parameters run for each test (overall reduction from 34267 test to 2184).
Would be interested to hear everyone else's thoughts on the matter
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: