luajit
Here are 483 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Nov 29, 2021 - Lua
Improved or typo fixed.
add new diagram before https://github.com/apache/apisix/blob/master/docs/en/latest/architecture-design/apisix.md#plugin-loading-process
Solution
-
Updated
Nov 18, 2021 - Lua
-
Updated
Nov 12, 2021 - C++
Could it be possible to have a warning message when installing a rock that contains a module that is already provided by another rock? Or is there already an option for this and I didn't find it?
At least with Luarocks version 3.2.1 I verified that there are no warnings for this case.
However it seems that Luarocks is aware of the collision and installs the new module under another name and
-
Updated
Nov 28, 2021 - C++
-
Updated
Nov 29, 2021 - Ruby
-
Updated
Nov 29, 2021 - Lua
-
Updated
Nov 17, 2021 - Lua
-
Updated
Dec 6, 2020 - C
-
Updated
Jan 9, 2019 - Perl
-
Updated
Nov 12, 2021 - Lua
-
Updated
Nov 27, 2021 - Lua
-
Updated
Oct 26, 2021 - Lua
-
Updated
Jul 28, 2020 - C
-
Updated
Apr 17, 2021 - Lua
-
Updated
Aug 26, 2021 - Lua
-
Updated
Nov 13, 2021 - C
-
Updated
Oct 10, 2021 - Lua
-
Updated
Sep 8, 2021 - Lua
The ported markdown documentation attempts to glean technical documentation that is relevant to moonjit such as installation and execution instructions, API, etc. It does not have benchmark numbers, sponsorship acknowledgements or contact details since they are not relevant to moonjit.
In the process however, a number of cross-links have gone missing and the port also may have errors, formatti
-
Updated
Jan 9, 2021 - Lua
Dart-lang
Language request for Dart.
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the luajit topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the luajit topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
Is there an existing issue for this?
Kong version (
$ kong version
)2.5.1.0
Current Behavior
When calling
kong.response.exit()
, the function automatically sets the Content-Length header on the response even if the Transfer-Encoding header is present. This is in violation of RFC 7230 3.3.2: