This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be acknowledged.
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Contents
- PREFACE
- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- Executive Summary
- ABBREVIATIONS TABLE
- BACKGROUND
- METHODS
- RESULTS
- LITERATURE FLOW DIAGRAM
- OVERVIEW OF INCLUDED STUDIES
- KEY QUESTION 1. TOOLS AND STRATEGIES REPORTED
- KEY QUESTION 2. EVIDENCE STRATIFIED BY TYPE OF INTERVENTION
- KEY QUESTION 2. ANY SDM TOOL OR DECISION AID COMPARED WITH USUAL CARE
- KEY QUESTION 2. EVIDENCE FROM RCTS
- KEY QUESTION 3. HARMS OF THE COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES, TOOLS, AND/OR APPROACHES
- KEY QUESTION 4. BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS
- DISCUSSION
- REFERENCES
- Appendix
Suggested citation:
Landsteiner A, Zerzan N, Ullman KE, et al. Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. Washington, DC: Evidence Synthesis Program, Health Systems Research, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs. VA ESP Project #09-009; 2024.
Disclosures: This report was prepared by the Evidence Synthesis Program Center located at Minneapolis VA Health Care System, directed by Timothy J. Wilt, MD, MPH and Wei Duan-Porter, MD, PhD and funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Systems Research.
The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the author(s) who are responsible for its contents and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government. Therefore, no statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the Department of Veterans Affairs. The final research questions, methodology, and/or conclusions may not necessarily represent the views of contributing operational and content experts. No investigators have affiliations or financial involvement (eg, employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties) that conflict with material presented in the report.
- Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening: A Systematic ReviewShared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...