Abstract
In a search for high-affinity receptor ligands that might serve for development as radioligands for the imaging of brain 5-HT4 receptors in vivo with positron emission tomography (PET), structural modifications were made to the high-affinity 5-HT4 antagonist, (1-butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 8-amino-7-iodo-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (1, SB 207710). These modifications were made mainly on the aryl side of the ester bond to permit possible rapid labeling of the carboxylic acid component with a positron-emitter, either carbon-11 (t1/2 = 20.4 min) or fluorine-18 (t1/2 = 109.7 min), and included, i) replacement of the iodine atom with a small substituent such as nitrile, methyl or fluoro, ii) methylation of the 8-amino group, iii) opening of the dioxan ring, and iv) alteration of the length of the N-alkyl goup. High-affinity ligands were discovered for recombinant human 5-HT4 receptors with amenability to labeling with a positron-emitter and potential for development as imaging probes. The ring-opened radioligand, (([methoxy-11C]1-butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 4-amino-3-methoxybenzoate; [11C]13), showed an especially favorable array of properties for future evaluation as a PET radioligand for brain 5-HT4 receptors.
Keywords: PET, Imaging, 5-HT4, Radioligand, Carbon-11, Fluorine-18
Introduction
Suitably effective radioligands, when applied with molecular imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), provide a unique means for measuring brain neurotransmitter receptor concentrations in living subjects, and therefore they constitute important clinical research tools.1 Such radioligands may also be used with imaging techniques to assess the receptor binding of unlabeled ligands in vivo, whether exogenous (e.g., a developmental or therapeutic drug, or a substance of abuse) or endogenous (the neurotransmitter), and hence they are also useful for drug discovery and development.2
Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) is an important neurotransmitter that is known to act on at least fourteen receptors in seven major sub-classes. Many of these receptors in brain have been implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders, and hence they have become targets for deep biomedical investigation and also for drug discovery and development programs. Although many effective radioligands exist for the in vivo imaging of some of the 5-HT receptors, especially the 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and 5-HT1B subtypes, radioligands for some other subtypes are not yet well explored (e.g., 5-HT4).
The 5-HT4 receptor is a well-characterized G-protein coupled receptor that exists abundantly in brain, especially in limbic and striatonigral regions.3 This receptor population is implicated in dopamine, serotonin and acetylcholine release, and possibly plays a significant role in normal cognition, learning, and memory. 5-HT4 receptors have also been implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, anxiety and depression.4,5,6
A reason for the relatively slow development of 5-HT4 PET radioligands is the wide array of properties that must ideally be found in any candidate. These include high target receptor affinity, high selectivity, generally moderate lipophilicity7, appropriate intrinsic activity, ability to cross the blood-brain barrier8, absence of troublesome radiometabolites8 and amenability to labeling with a suitable radioisotope.9,10 Suitable radioisotopes are generally short-lived carbon-11 (t1/2 = 20.4 min) or fluorine-18 (t1/2 = 109.7 min) for PET and iodine-123 (t1/2 = 13.2 h) for SPECT.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 8-amino-7-iodo-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (1, SB 207710; Chart 1) is an exceptionally high-affinity 5-HT4 receptor antagonist.11,12 The use of [123I]1 with SPECT provided the first demonstration of 5-HT4 receptor imaging in primate brain in vivo.13 Some analogs of 1, labeled with either carbon-11 or fluorine-18 in the terminal N-alkyl group, have been prepared and one of these, [11C]2 ([11C]SB 207145; Chart 1) has shown promise for PET imaging in animal14 and human subjects15,16. This radioligand is an ester and rapidly metabolized in vivo by hydrolysis. Here, we aimed to develop alternative radioligands for 5-HT4 receptor imaging with PET, again based on 1, in which the radiolabel is located on the carbonyl side of the ester group to avoid potential issues from possibly brain-penetrant radiometabolites, and to permit control of lipophilicity through adjustment of N-alkyl chain length. The ester hydrolysis of such radioligands outside brain would produce carboxylic acids as radiometabolites; these radiometabolites would be expected to have poor entry into brain and therefore would not be expected to interfere with the measurement of brain receptor density with the parent radioligand.8 The 5-HT4 radioligand [11C]2 has been shown to be amenable to quantification in human brain,16 implying that ester hydrolysis to generate benzoates as radiometabolites within brain should not be a major concern for ligands related to 1. Control of lipophilicity can be important for adjusting properties that may impact on the potential success of a radioligand, including its plasma free fraction, ability to penetrate the blood-brain-barrier (permeability parameter)17 and susceptibility to metabolism.8–10 Our synthetic strategies included replacement of the aryl halo group, and/or alkylation of the aryl amino group, opening of the dioxan ring and manipulation of the N-alkyl chain length. As a result, several new high-affinity ligands were discovered and radiolabeled as prospective PET radioligands for 5-HT4 receptors. The 3-methoxy compound, [11C]13, was found to have an especially favorable array of properties for further evaluation as a new 5-HT4 receptor PET radioligand.
Chart 1.
Current analogs of 1 for 5-HT4 receptor imaging in vivo.
Results
Chemistry
We considered several approaches for modifying the structure of 1 to allow carbon-11 to be introduced as a radiolabel into the structure on the carbonyl side of the ester bond, using readily accessible labeling agents such as [11C]methyl iodide18, [11C]methyl triflate19 or [11C]cyanide ion20. These strategies included: i) replacing the iodo group in 1 with a group of similar or smaller size, namely nitrile, as in 5 and 11, or methyl as in 7 (Scheme 1), ii) N-methylation, as in 6 and 8–11 (Scheme 1), and iii) replacement of the dioxan ring by a single O-methyl group, as in 12 and 13 (Scheme 2). Ligand 5 was obtained in low but useful yield (19%) by treating 1 with potassium cyanide. The N-methyl compound 6 was obtained in good yield (60%) by treating the primary arylamine 4 with paraformaldehyde and then sodium borohydride. Treatment of 6 with N-halosuccinimides (NXS, X = Cl, Br or I) gave the respective halo derivatives 8–10 in moderate yields (30–56%). Ligand 7 was obtained from 1 in moderate yield (44%) through Pd-catalyzed methylation with tetramethyltin. Ligand 11 was similarly obtained from ligand 10 but in much lower yield (7%). The ring O-methyl derivatives, 12 and 13, were obtained in moderate (32%) and low (8%) overall yields, respectively, from the corresponding methyl esters 12a and 13a in two steps, namely N-protection and trans-esterification (Scheme 2). Analogs of 13, in which either the ester group was replaced with an amido group, as in 14, or in which the length of the N-alkyl group was altered to vary lipophilicity, as in 15 and 16, were also prepared in two steps and moderate overall yields (30–69%) from 4-amino-3-methoxybenzoic acid (Scheme 3).
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of ring methyl, halo and nitrile ligands, and N-methyl ligands 5–11.a
aReagents and conditions: (i) NXS (X = Cl, Br or I), AcOH; (ii) KCN, CuI, 1,10-phenanthroline, DMF, 42 h, 110 ºC; (iii) 1) paraformaldehyde, EtOH, 20 h, 60 ºC; 2) NaBH4; (iv) Me4Sn, CuI, Pd2(dba)3, TPP, NMP, 70 ºC, 48 h.
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of ring methoxy ligands, 12 and 13.a
aReagents and conditions: (i) CbzCl, NaHCO3, overnight; (ii) 1) lithium (1-butylpiperidin-4-yl)methanolate, THF, 0 °C, then rt overnight; 2) H2, Pd/C.
Scheme 3.
Synthesis of amide (14) and N-alkyl analogs (15 and 16) of 13.a
aReagents and conditions: i) CDT; (ii) (1-butylpiperidin-4-yl)methanamine or lithium (1-propylpiperidin-4-yl)methanolate or lithium (1-pentylpiperidin-4-yl)methanolate.
For the purpose of creating a radioligand that might be labeled with fluorine-18, we succeeded in preparing 17, a 7-fluoro analog of 1, in six steps from 5-fluoro-2-hydroxybenzoic acid (Scheme 4). All steps proceeded in > 75% yield, except the final two-stage esterification, involving Cbz–protection (34%) and trans-esterification (59%). Also, two fluoroalkoxy analogs of 13, the fluoro-methoxy compound 18 and the 2-fluoroethoxy compound 19, were prepared in two steps from methyl 4-amino-3-hydroxybenzoate in moderate overall yields of 37 and 20%, respectively (Scheme 5).
Scheme 4.
Synthesis of ring fluoro ligand, 17a.
aReagents and conditions: (i) NBS, AcOH; (ii) NaOH, CuSO4; (iii) 1) TMSCHN2; 2) Cs2CO3, 1,2-dibromoethane, DMF, 80 °C, 16 h; (iv) HNO3 - 50 °C, 16 min; (v) 10% Pd/C, HCOOK, MeOH, 80 °C, 2 h; (vi) 1) CbzCl, aq. NaHCO3; 2) CDI, MeCN, rt, 2 h; 3) lithium (1-butylpiperidin-4-yl)methanolate, THF, 0 °C, then rt overnight; 4) H2, Pd/C.
Scheme 5.
Synthesis of fluoroalkoxy ligands, 18 and 19.a
aReagents and conditions: i) F(CH2)nCl, Cs2CO3, DMF, rt; (ii) lithium (1-butylpiperidin-4-yl)methanolate, THF, 0 °C, then rt overnight.
Potential precursors for radiolabeling were also synthesized, including the phenol precursor 20 by demethylation of 13 (42% yield) (Scheme 6), and the nitro compound 21 in three steps from 8-amino-7-nitro-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine carboxylic acid methyl ester (21a) in 42% overall yield (Scheme 7).
Scheme 6.
Synthesis of phenol precursor, 20.a
aReagents and conditions: (i) AlCl3, NaI, MeCN, reflux, overnight.
Scheme 7.
Synthesis of nitro analog, 21.a
aReagents and conditions: (i) (Boc)2O, DMAP, 50 °C, 1 h; (ii) lithium (1-butylpiperidin-4-yl)methanolate, THF, 0 °C, then rt overnight; (iii) 4M HCl in dioxane, overnight.
Pharmacological Assays and Screen
Assay of compounds 1, 5, 8, 13, 15 and 17–19 for binding to 5-HT4 receptors in guinea pig striatal membranes showed all these compounds to have sub-nanomolar Ki values (Table 1). However, assay of the same ligand set against human recombinant 5-HT4 receptors (h5-HT4), expressed in HEK293T cells, revealed a greater variation in Ki, with only some of the compounds (1, 8, 13 and 17) showing low nanomolar values. This assay was applied to the full range of new ligands and revealed interesting structure-activity information (Table 1).
Table 1.
Binding affinities (1/Ki),a efficacies and cLogD values of new 5-HT4 ligands.
![]() | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Compound | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | X | n | 5-HT4Ki (nM)a | h5-HT4Ki (nM)b | Efficacyc | pEC50 | cLogDd |
1 | I | H | OCH2 | OCH2 | O | 2 | 0.20 | 2.2 ± 0.3 | Inv. Ag. | 7.9 | 3.20 |
4 | H | H | OCH2 | OCH2 | O | 2 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | Antagonist | - | 1.74 | |
5 | CN | H | OCH2 | OCH2 | O | 2 | 0.45 | 33 ± 5 | n.m. | n.m. | 2.59 |
6 | H | Me | OCH2 | OCH2 | O | 2 | 9.1 ± 0.7 | Inv.Ag | 8.05 | 2.37 | |
7 | Me | H | OCH2 | OCH2 | O | 2 | 6.3 ± 1 | Antagonist | - | 2.20 | |
8 | Cl | Me | OCH2 | OCH2 | O | 2 | 0.577 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | Inv. Ag. | 7.85 | 3.27 |
9 | Br | Me | OCH2 | OCH2 | O | 2 | 4.5 ± 0.4 | Inv. Ag. | 8.0 | 3.36 | |
10 | I | Me | OCH2 | OCH2 | O | 2 | 7.4 ± 0.5 | Inv. Ag. | 7.7 | 3.41 | |
11 | CN | Me | OCH2 | OCH2 | O | 2 | 37 ± 5 | Inv. Ag. | 7.8 | 2.52 | |
12 | H | H | H | OMe | O | 2 | 50 ± 7 | Ag. | 9.75 | 1.77 | |
13 | H | H | OMe | H | O | 2 | 0.738 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | Antagonist | - | 2.07 |
14 | H | H | OMe | H | N | 2 | 8,664 ± 857 | n.m. | n.m. | 0.16 | |
15 | H | H | OMe | H | O | 1 | 0.901 | 17 ± 1 | n.m. | n.m. | 1.54 |
16 | H | H | OMe | H | O | 3 | 12 ± 1 | n.m. | n.m. | 2.60 | |
17 | F | H | OCH2 | OCH2 | O | 2 | 0.334 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | Inv. Ag. | 8.23 | 2.42 |
18 | H | H | OCH2F | H | O | 2 | 0.334 | 17 ± 1 | n.m. | n.m. | 1.97 |
19 | H | H | O(CH2)2F | H | O | 2 | 0.215 | 11 ± 1 | n.m. | n.m. | 2.30 |
21 | NO2 | H | OCH2 | OCH2 | O | 2 | 7.8 ± 0.9 | n.m. | n.m. | 3.04 |
For guinea pig striatal membrane 5-HT4 receptors. Values are averages of triplicate measurements.
For h5-HT4 receptors. Binding assay results are averages of triplicate measurements.
In agonist/inverse agonist assay. Ag. = agonist; Inv. Ag. = Inverse agonist; n.m. = not measured.
cLogD was calculated with ACD software; estimated errors, are approximately ± 1.0.
Replacement of the iodine atom in 1 with a nitrile, methyl or nitro group resulted in approximately 15-, 3- and 3.5-fold decrease in binding affinity, respectively, whereas replacement with fluorine retained binding affinity and replacement with hydrogen slightly increased affinity. N-Methylation of 1 resulted in about a 4-fold reduction in binding affinity, while the N-methylation of the corresponding nitrile, 5, resulted in only a marginal reduction in binding affinity. The N-methyl 8-chloro analog 8 showed a binding affinity comparable to that of 1.
Replacement of the dioxan ring in 1 with a 2-methoxy group gave ligand 12 with much reduced affinity whereas replacement with a 3-methoxy group gave ligand 13 with affinity comparable to that of 1. Shortening or lengthening of the N-alkyl chain length in 13 gave ligands of 5- and 7-fold lower affinity, respectively.
Replacement of the ester group in 13 with an amido group drastically reduced binding affinity.
Replacement of the methoxy group in 13 with fluoromethoxy or 2-fluoroethoxy led to 7- and 5-fold reduction in binding affinity, respectively.
A selection of the compounds was also assessed for intrinsic activity (Table 1). The majority of these ligands were found to be quite potent partial or full inverse agonists with pEC50 values in the range 7.70–8.23. The 2-methoxy ligand 12 was found to be a potent full agonist with a pEC50 value of 9.75. In stark contrast, the high-affinity regional isomer 13 was found to be an antagonist. The arylmethyl analog of 1 was also found to be an antagonist, as was the previously known ligand, 4.
Ligand 13 showed greater than 2000-fold selectivity for h5-HT4 receptors versus twelve other h5-HT receptors and binding sites (Table 2). Ligands 8 and 17 were not quite as selective among h5-HT receptors and binding sites. The lowest selectivity for 8 was 33-fold versus h5-HT2B receptors and for 17, 80-fold versus the same receptors (Table 2). Ligand 13 also exhibited high selectivity for h5-HT4 receptors versus a wide range of non-serotonergic receptors and binding sites (Table 3). For 13, the lowest selectivities for h5-HT4 receptors were versus σ1 and σ2 receptors, namely 88- and 62–fold, respectively. Ligands 8 and 17 were also generally selective for h5-HT4 receptors versus other receptors and binding sites, except that they displayed much lower selectivities versus σ1 and especially σ2 receptors (Table 3). Ligand 8 also showed a quite low 22-fold selectivity versus D4 receptors (Table 3).
Table 2.
Binding affinities of 5-HT4 ligands 8, 13 and 17 forother 5-HT receptors/binding sites.
Binding site or receptor | Binding affinities (Ki) (nM) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Ligand 8 | Ligand 13 | Ligand 17 | |
h5-HT4 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 2.1 |
h5-HT1A | 300 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
h5-HT1B | 820 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
h5-HT1D | 1,304 | 5,686 | 2,856 |
h5-HT1E | >10,000 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
h5-HT2A | 1,776 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
h5-HT2B | 66 | 2,861 | 168 |
h5-HT2C | 685 | >10,000 | 8,363 |
h5-HT3 | 1,072 | 3,511 | >10,000 |
h5-HT5A | 8,589 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
h5-HT6 | 489 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
h5-HT7 | 5,702 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
hSERT | 9,006 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
Table 3.
Binding affinities of 5-HT4 ligands 8, 13 and 17 for non-serotonergicreceptors and binding sites.
Binding site or receptor | Binding affinities (Ki) (nM) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Ligand 8 | Ligand 13 | Ligand 17 | |
hα1A | 522 | >10,000 | 87.6 |
hα1B | >10,000 | 4,228 | 9,076 |
hα1D | 2,276 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
hα2A | 2,239 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
hα2B | 671.2 | >10,000 | 773 |
hα2C | 556 | 989 | 593 |
β1 (rat) | >10,000 | 4,407 | >10,000 |
β2 (rat) | >10,000 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
β3 (rat) | >10,000 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
σ1 (rat) | 60 | 211 | 55 |
σ2 (rat) | 8 | 148 | 12.9 |
BZP (rat brain site) | >10,000 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
hDAT | 2,020 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
hDOR | >10,000 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
D1 (rat) | 2,291 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
D2 (rat) | 220 | >10,000 | 615 |
D3 (rat) | 336 | 6,272 | 1,011 |
D4 (rat) | 43 | 1,272 | 316 |
hD5 | 972 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
hGABAA | >10,000 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
H1 (guinea pig) | 2,727 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
H2 (guinea pig) | >10,000 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
H3 (guinea pig) | >10,000 | 1,649 | 5,038 |
H4 (guinea pig) | >10,000 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
hKOR | >10,000 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
hMOR | >10,000 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
hM1 | >10,000 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
hM2 | 433 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
hM3 | 823 | 1,095 | >10,000 |
hM4 | 760 | 2,579 | >10,000 |
hM5 | 972 | 4,058 | >10,000 |
hNET | 3,226 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
Computation of cLogD
The. cLogD values of ligands ranged from 1.74 to 3.27 (Table 1).
Syntheses of Radioligands
Some ligands, namely ligands 5, 8, 13, 17 and 18, were selected to test their amenability for rapid labeling with a positron-emitter, either carbon-11 or fluorine-18. Ligand [11C]5, a [11C]nitrile, was produced in an average of 26% decay-corrected radiochemical yield (RCY) by Pd-mediated exchange of the iodine atom with no-carrier-added (NCA) [11C]cyanide ion in the presence of potassium carbonate-K 2.2.2 in THF (Scheme 8). Use of potassium dihydrogen phosphate as base in THF or DMSO21 gave much lower RCY (Table 4). The N-[11C]methyl ligand, [11C]8, was obtained in 11% RCY by 11C-methylation of 1 with NCA [11C] methyl iodide in the presence of the solid base, Li3N, under the influence of ultrasound (Scheme 9). Use of Li2O as solid base resulted in a lower RCY (7%) of [11C]8. The O-[11C]methyl ligand [11C]13 was obtained from the phenol 20 by methylation with either NCA [11C]methyl iodide or [11C]methyl triflate in either 36 or 27% RCY, respectively (Scheme 9). An experiment based on 13C/11C co-labeling, followed by 13C-NMR,22 confirmed the position of the radiolabel. This radioligand was obtained in moderately high specific radioactivity, namely 2,848 mCi/μmol from [11C]methyl iodide and 2,517 mCi/μmol from [11C]methyl triflate at the end of radiosynthesis.
Scheme 8.
Radiosynthesis of [11C]5.a
a Reagents, conditions and yield: (i) [11C]HCN, Pd(PPh3)4, K2CO3, THF, K 2.2.2, 80 °C, 5 min, RCY = 26%.
Table 4.
RCYs for [11C]5 under various conditions.
Solvent | Base | RCYa (%) | n |
---|---|---|---|
THF | KH2PO4 | 2 | 1 |
DMSO | KH2PO4 | 10 | 2 |
THF | K2CO3, K 2.2.2 | 26 | 3 |
From [11C]HCN.
Scheme 9.
Radiosynthesis of [11C]8.a.
a Reagents, conditions and yield: (i) [11C]MeI, Li3N, DMF, rt, ultrasound, 10 min. RCY= 11%.
All attempts to prepare [18F]17 by substitution of the nitro group in precursor 21 or the N-Boc-protected analog 21c with cyclotron-produced [18F]fluoride ion were unsuccessful. However, the [18F]fluoro-di-deutero-methoxy ligand, NCA [18F]18 was obtained in 13% RCY from [18F]fluoride ion by treating the phenol 21 with derived [18F]d2-fluorobromomethane in acetonitrile with NaOH as base at 100 ºC (Scheme 10). Other tested conditions gave inferior RCYs (Table 5).
Scheme 10.
Radiosyntheses of [11C]13 and [18F]18.a
aReagents, conditions and yields: (i) [11C]MeI, DMF, 1.0 M (n-Bu)4NOH in MeOH, 80 °C, 5 min, RCY = 36%; (ii) [11C]MeOTf, MeCN, 0.5 MNaOH, heat, 5 min, RCY = 27%; (iii) [18F]FCD2Br, MeCN, 0.5MNaOH, 100 °C, 15 min. RCY= 13% from [18F]fluoride ion.
Table 5.
RCYs of [18F]18 under various conditions.
Solvent | Base | T (ºC) | Time (min) | RCY a (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
MeCN | 0.5M NaOH | 80 | 5 | 1 |
DMF | K2CO3, 18-crown-6 | 110 | 10 | 7 |
MeCN | 0.5M NaOH | 100 | 15 | 13 |
Overall from starting [11C]fluoride ion.
Discussion
In this study, variation of the structure of 1 led to several new high-affinity ligands for guinea pig and h5-HT4, receptors, some of which proved amenable to labeling with a positron-emitter to provide candidate radioligands for imaging brain 5-HT4 receptors with PET. Interestingly, all seven new ligands (5, 8, 13, 15,17–19) that were tested for binding to guinea pig 5-HT4 receptors showed sub-nanomolar affinity within a narrow range (Ki = 0.22–0.90 nM), while the same set of ligands assayed against human recombinant receptors (h5-HT4) showed somewhat lower binding affinity across a wider range (Ki = 2.2–33 nM) (Table 1). This species difference was unexpected, since 5-HT4 receptor ligands from several other structural classes do not show such major differences in binding affinity between guinea pig 5-HT4 and h5-HT4 receptors.23 Also, the affinities of 1, the prototypic ligand for our series, were previously reported to be quite similar for human colon and guinea pig 5-HT4 receptors.12 Because any successfully developed PET radioligand would ultimately be used for imaging 5-HT4 receptors in human brain, all new ligands from this study were assayed against h5-HT4 receptors (Table 1).
Replacement of the iodine atom in 1 with a methyl or nitro substituent reduced h5-HT4 receptor binding affinity by less than one order of magnitude, whereas replacement with a fluoro substituent caused negligible change, and replacement with hydrogen slightly improved affinity (Table 1). Replacement with a nitrile or nitro group caused a 15- or 4-fold reduction in affinity, respectively. Therefore, the h5-HT4 receptor was quite tolerant of a small substituent ortho to the 8-amino group in 1, irrespective of the electronic influence of the substituent.
Although a primary arylamino group is a frequent constituent of ligands reported for 5-HT4 receptors,24 the effect of N-alkylation of this group on binding affinity had not been examined previously. We found that the N-methylations of 1, 4 and 5 caused only small reductions of binding affinity, of about 3-, 6.5- and 1.1-fold, respectively. The N-methylated 4 recovered its affinity to 2.0 nM after chlorination in the ortho position as seen in 8. Another prepared N-methyl ligand, 9, also exhibited low nanomolar affinity. Thus, the h5-HT4 receptor readily tolerates the secondary 8-N-methylamino substituent in this structural class of ligand.
SB 204070 (3) is the 7-chloro analog of 1. The non-dioxan 2-methoxy analog of 3 has nanomolar affinity for guinea pig 5-HT4 receptors.25 Here, opening of the dioxan ring in the proto analog of 1, namely ligand 4, by removal of either OCH2 group gave the two O-methyl compounds, 12 and 13. Binding affinity was reduced 36-fold in the 2-methoxy compound 12 but only 1.7-fold in the 3-methoxy compound 13. Replacement of the 3-methoxy group in 13 with fluoromethoxy or 2-fluoroethoxy reduced affinity by 7- and 4.6-fold, respectively. Shortening or lengthening of the N-alkyl chain in 13, similarly reduced binding affinity by 7- and 5-fold, respectively.
We noted that the conversion of the ester function in the benzodioxan 3 into an amido function has negligible effect on binding affinity (1/IC50)24 and in the ring-opened 2-methoxy analog causes only a 10-fold reduction in binding affinity.25 We therefore considered replacing the ester function in the new radioligands with an amide function in order to confer greater resistance to hydrolysis in vivo. However, replacement of the ester group in the 3-methyl ether 13 with an amido group dramatically reduced affinity by several thousand-fold.
The maximal receptor-specific signal to be expected from the use of a radioligand with PET is related to the binding potential (BP), expressed as Bmax/KD, where Bmax is the local concentration of receptors and KD is the equilibrium dissociation constant of radioligand from the receptor.9,10 Therefore, high affinity (1/KD or as a surrogate measure, 1/Ki) is a key parameter in determining whether a particular radioligand can be successful. Previously, it has been found that moderately sizeable receptor-specific signals can be obtained in mini-pig,14 monkey13 and human16 subjects in vivo with 5-HT4 receptor radioligands having KD values in the low or sub-nanomolar range, such as [123I]1 and [11C]2. Our new ligands 8, 13 and 17 showed Ki values less than or comparable with that of 1 for h5-HT4 receptors, and they therefore met the high-affinity criterion for development as PET radioligands. Since target selectivity, intrinsic activity26 and lipophilicity also bear on the likely success of candidate PET radioligands,9,10 these three ligands were also assessed for these parameters. For comparison, lipophilicity was also computed for the other synthesized ligands, and intrinsic activity also assessed for 1, 4 and 6–13 and 17.
Ligands 1, 8 and 17 appeared to be similarly potent inverse agonists in the GloSensor assay, whereas ligands 4 and 13 were antagonists (inactive) in the same assay (Table 1). Ligand 1 is widely considered to be an antagonist at 5-HT4 receptors.11,12 However, it should be noted that ligands characterized as competitive antagonists often express inverse agonism in assays where constituitive receptor activity is present.27 This fact likely explains why 1 appears to be an inverse agonist in the Glo-sensor assay. Ligand 7 was also inactive in the Glo-sensor assay, whereas ligands 6 and 9–11 were inverse agonists. Remarkably, ligand 12, the close methoxy positional isomer of the antagonist 13, was a potent agonist with quite high binding affinity.
Ligands 8, 13 and 17 showed generally high selectivity for binding to h5-HT4 receptors versus binding to other h5-HT receptors and binding sites (Table 2). The lowest selectivity was 33-fold for ligand 8 versus h5-HT2B receptors. Although there is strong evidence that 5-HT2B receptors exist in brain, their distribution and density in human brain remains unknown and is suspected to be low.28,29 Thus, the low-affinity binding of 8 to 5-HT2B receptors in human brain in vivo would likely be insignificant compared to its high-affinity binding to relatively abundant 5-HT4 receptors. Therefore, this off-target binding would probably not be a serious impediment to the development of 8 as a PET radioligand. Ligands 8, 13 and 17 showed only low affinity for a wide range of other receptors and binding sites, except for σ1 and σ2 receptors in the cases of 8 and 17 and for D4 receptors in the case of 8 (Table 3). Both sigma receptors are present in brain,30 and indeed σ1 receptors may be imaged with PET in vivo with moderately high-affinity radioligands, such as [11C]SA4503 (Ki = 17.4 nM).30 Thus, the affinities of ligands 8 (Ki = 60 nM) and 17 (Ki = 55 nM) for σ1 receptors may be insufficiently low for successful 5-HT4 receptor PET imaging. Imaging data suggest that the density of σ2 receptors in human brain is much lower than that of σ1 receptors.30 Hence, it is uncertain whether the high-affinities of 8 (Ki = 8 nM) and 17 (Ki = 13 nM) for σ2 receptors may be problematic for their development as PET 5-HT4 receptor radioligands. The moderate affinity of 8 for D4 receptors is unlikely to be problematic, since D4 receptors only exist in very low density in human brain.31,32 As a candidate for development as a PET radioligand, 13 expressed excellent overall 5-HT4 receptor selectivity, with greater than 60-fold selectivity against the full range of tested receptors and binding sites (Table 3).
Ligands 8, 13 and 17 had computed lipophilicities (cLogD values) between 2.0 and 3.3, and these are within the range considered desirable for achieving adequate brain entry from blood without incurring excessive non-specific binding.7–10
Given the array of favourable properties expressed by ligands 8, 13 and 17, it appeared especially attractive to attempt to label these ligands with a positron-emitter, either carbon-11 or fluorine-18, to give radioligands that might be tested and evaluated in vivo with PET.
Various conditions were attempted for the labeling of 8 with carbon-11 in its N-methyl group, all based on 11C-methylation of the primary arylamine, 3. However, 3, as is quite usual for primary arylamines, proved stubbornly reactive towards [11C]methyl iodide or [11C]methyl triflate under conventional conditions. Recently, we have developed methodology for labeling such precursors in the presence of a strong inorganic base under the influence of ultrasound agitation. This method, using DMF as solvent and Li3N as solid base gave [11C]8 in low but still useful RCY (11%) from [11C]methyl iodide after HPLC separation (Figure 9).
By contrast to 8, the methoxy compound 13, was readily labeled by reaction of the phenol 20 with [11C]methyl iodide or [11C]methyl triflate under basic conditions. No protection of the anilino nitrogen was necessary because of its low reactivity towards these labeling agents. The selectivity of the 11C-methylation reaction for the phenol oxygen versus the anilino nitrogen was confirmed through a 11C/13C co-labelling experiment and subsequent 13C-NMR spectroscopy.22 [11C]13 was readily separated by HPLC and was shown to be radiochemically pure by analytical HPLC.
The labeling of the fluoro compound 17 was first attempted through treatment of the N-Boc-protected 21 with NCA [18F]fluoride ion because the presence of unprotected amino group plus the electron-rich nature of the aryl ring were expected to oppose facile aromatic nucleophilic substitution.33 The N-Boc group was found to be unstable when temperature exceeded 120 °C. Nitro substitution occurred in deprotected 21 at high temperature (200 °C) but not without concomitant ester hydrolysis. The direct labeling of 21 also only gave [18F]fluoride ion-substituted benzoic acid at similarly high temperature. Another attempt based on halogen exchange in methyl 7-iodo-8-nitro-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate precursor resulted in the replacement of the nitro group instead of the iodo group by [18F]fluoride ion. We considered other strategies for 18F-labeling, including the production of a diaryliodonium salt precursor for radiofluorination.34 However, we were unable to synthesize a suitable iodonium salt via a metalated-ring intermediate, since the aryl ring resisted clean stannylation, boronation or mercuration by conventional reagents and methods. Curiously, the n-tributyl stannyl analog of 1 is known13 but its synthesis, as far as we can ascertain, has never been published. Therefore, the radiosynthesis of [18F]17 remains a major challenge.
The radiolabeling of the relatively lower affinity ligands 5 and 18 with carbon-11 and fluorine-18, respectively, was shown to be feasible. Thus, [11C]5 was obtained by palladium-mediated 11C-cyanation of 1 and [18F]18 by 18F-fluoromethylation of the phenol 20 with [18F]d2-fluoromethyl bromide. Deuterium was incorporated into [18F]18 to provide for greater resistance to defluorination in vivo.34–36
Conclusions
In this study, manipulations of the structure of 1 led to several new ligands with high affinity towards guinea pig 5-HT4 receptors and a few (8, 13 and 17) with comparably high affinity towards h5-HT4 receptors. Both 8 and 13 were amenable to labeling with carbon-11, whereas the labeling of 17 with NCA fluorine-18 remains a challenge. [11C]8 has affinity, selectivity, intrinsic activity and computed lipophilicity comparable to [123I]1 (Table 1), and should prove to be similarly effective for imaging 5-HT4 receptors in monkey in vivo. [11C]13 is an easily-labeled, highly selective, high-affinity, and moderate lipophilicity antagonist for 5-HT4 receptors and therefore merits evaluation as a PET radioligand for the study of 5-HT4 receptors in vivo with PET. This radioligand is currently under evaluation in monkey, and findings will be published elsewhere.
Experimental Section
Materials
Methyl 3-methoxy-4-nitrobenzoate, 4-(aminomethyl)-1-(n-butyl)-piperidine, and tetra-kis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA). Chlorofluoromethane and 1-chloro-2-fluoroethane were purchased from SynQuest (Alachua, FL). Other chemicals were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI) and used as received. Compounds 3 (SB 204070; 1-butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 8-amino-7-chloro-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxane-5-carboxylate) and the des-chloro analog 4 were synthesized from 2,3-dihydro-benzodioxin by modified literature procedures.25, 37, 38
General Methods
1H- (400.13 MHz), 13C- (100.62 MHz) and 19F- (376.46 MHz) NMR spectra were recorded at rt on an Avance-400 spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA). Chemical shifts are reported in δ units (ppm) downfield relative to the chemical shift for tetramethylsilane. Abbreviations s, d, t, dd, dt and bs denote singlet, doublet, triplet, doublet of doublet, doublet of triplet and broad singlet. Thin layer chromatography was performed with POLYGRAM® SIL G/UV254 layers (0.2 mm silica gel with fluorescent indicator; Grace Davison Discovery Sciences; Deerfield, IL); compounds were visualized under UV light (λ = 254 nm).
High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were acquired from the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (Urbana, IL) under electron ionization conditions using a double-focusing high-resolution mass spectrometer (Autospec, Micromass Inc., USA) with samples introduced through a direct insertion probe.
LC-MS analyses of synthesized compounds were performed on an LCQ Deca model instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific Corp.; Waltham, MA). A gradient or isocratic LC analysis of sample was carried out with binary solvents (A: B; 150 μL/min) composed of water-methanol-acetic acid (90: 10: 0.5 by vol.) (A) and methanol-acetic acid (100: 0.5, v/v) (B) on a Luna C18 column (3 μm, 50 × 2 mm; Phenomenex; Torrance, CA). Following electrospray ionization of the column effluent, ions m/z 150 through 750 were acquired.
Melting points were measured with a Mel-Temp manual apparatus (Electrothermal, Fisher Scientific) and were uncorrected.
γ-Radioactivity from 11C and 18F was measured using a calibrated dose calibrator (Atomlab 300; Biodex Medical Systems). Radioactivity measurements were corrected for physical decay. All radiochemistry was performed in lead-shielded hot-cells for personnel protection from radiation.
Radioactive products were separated by HPLC on a Gemini or Gemini-NX C18 column (5 μm, 10 × 250 mm; Phenomenex) eluted with 10 mM-NH4OH-MeCN or 100 mM-HCOONH4-MeCN at the stated composition and flow rate. Eluates were monitored for radioactivity (pin diode detector; Bioscan) and absorbance at 294 nm (System Gold 166 detector; Beckman).
The purity of each new non-radioactive compound was assessed by reverse phase HPLC under the conditions tabulated in Supporting Information. Each compound was shown to have a chemical purity of > 98%. Radioactive compounds were analyzed with HPLC on a Gemini C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 150 mm) or Gemini-NX C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm; Phenomenex) eluted with 10 mM-NH4OH-MeCN or 100 mM-HCOONH4-MeCN at the later stated composition and flow rate. Eluates were monitored for radioactivity (pin diode detector; Bioscan). Samples were injected alone, and then co-injected with the reference non-radioactive compound to check for co-elution. RCYs were calculated for labeled products isolated with HPLC.
Computation of cLogP and cLogD
cLogP and cLogD (at pH 7.4) values for ligands were computed with ACD software.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 8-amino-7-iodo-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (1)
N-Iodosuccinimide (498 mg, 2.21 mmol) was added portion-wise to a solution of 4 (770 mg, 2.21 mmol) in acetic acid (5 mL) at 0 °C and stirred at rt for 2 h. The acetic acid was evaporated off, and the residue was basified with NaHCO3 solution and extracted twice with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (MeOH-CH2Cl2, 1: 20 v/v) of the residue gave 1 as a light yellow oil (410 mg, 40%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.25–1.53 (6H, m), 1.74–1.79 (3H, m), 1.94 (2H, t, J = 11.2 Hz), 2.31–2.34 (2H, m), 2.96 (2H, d, J = 11.2 Hz), 4.10 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.30–4.38 (4H, m), 4.54 (2H, bs), 7.82 (1H, s). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 14.09, 20.92, 29.02, 29.17, 35.53, 53.44, 58.89, 63.97, 64.44, 68.86, 71.21, 110.80, 129.77, 133.29, 141.06, 144.75, 164.14.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 8-amino-7-cyano-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (5) 39
A mixture of 1 (200 mg, 0.42 mmol), KCN (42 mg, 0.64 mmol), CuI (17 mg, 0.084 mmol) and 1,10-phenanthroline (30 mg, 0.17 mmol) in DMF (500 μL) was stirred at 110 °C in an oven-dried sealed tube under Ar for 42 h. Then the mixture was cooled to rt and filtered through celite. The celite pad was rinsed twice with CH2Cl2. The combined filtrates were evaporated to dryness and dissolved in MeOH. Separation by HPLC on an XTerra RP18 column (10 μm, 19 × 250 mm; Waters) eluted with MeOH -aq. NH4OH (0.025%) (9: 1 v/v) at 10 mL/min) gave 5 as a pale yellow solid (tR = 14 min; 30 mg, 19%). Mp: 108–110 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.28–1.50 (6H, m), 1.81–1.84 (3H, m), 2.15 (2H, t, J = 11.4 Hz), 2.51 (2H, m), 3.16 (2H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 4.12 (2H, d, J = 6.0 Hz), 4.34–4.44 (4H, m), 4.87 (2H, s), 7.67 (1H, s). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 14.09, 20.92, 29.06, 29.23, 35.53, 53.42, 58.89, 63.73, 64.85, 69.13, 88.00, 110.11, 116.81, 128.80, 129.90, 143.32, 147.47, 163.64. LC-MS m/z: [M + H]+, 374.2. HRMS: calc’d for C20H27N3O4 (M+ + H), 374.2080; found, 374.2070.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 8-(methylamino)-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (6) 40
A mixture of 4 (2.24 g, 6.44 mmol) and paraformaldehyde (580 mg) in ethanol (58 mL) was heated at 60 °C overnight and then NaBH4 (245 mg, 6.44 mmol) was added. The mixture was heated at 70 °C for 2 h and then evaporated to dryness. The residue was diluted with water and extracted thrice with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were dried on MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography of the residue (MeOH-CH2Cl2, 1: 20 v/v) gave 6 as a colorless oil (1.4 g, 60%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.29–1.35 (2H, m), 1.52–1.53 (4H, m), 1.78–1.82 (3H, m), 1.99 (2H, t, J = 11.2 Hz ), 2.39–2.35 (2H, m), 2.90 (2H, d, J = 5.2 Hz), 3.02 (2H, d, J = 11.2 Hz), 4.10 (2H, d, J = 6.0 Hz), 4.28–4.30 (2H, m), 4.34–4.36 (2H, m), 4.46–4.52 (1H, m), 6.18 (1H, d, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.51 (1H, d, J = 8.8 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 14.02, 20.85, 28.78, 28.88, 29.85, 35.47, 53.38, 58.75, 63.83, 64.50, 68.18, 100.99, 107.36, 125.60, 129.78, 143.15, 144.11, 165.40. LC-MS m/z: [M + H]+, 363.3. HRMS: calc’d for C20H30N2O4 (M+ + H), 363.2284; found, 363.2281.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 8-amino-7-methyl-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (7) 41
1 (210 mg, 0.44 mmol), N-methyl pyrrolidone (560 μL), Pd2(dba)3 (14 mg, 0.015 mmol) and PPh3 (28 mg, 0.11 mmol) were added to an oven-dried sealed tube. The mixture was heated at 50 °C for 10 min and then CuI (6.0 mg, 0.031mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred for another 10 min and then Me4Sn (91 μL, 0.65 mmol) was added. The mixture was heated at 70 °C for 48 h. The solvent was evaporated off and, the residue was diluted with water and extracted thrice with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (MeOH-CH2Cl2, 1: 20 v/v) of the residue gave 7 as a pale yellow oil (70 mg, 44%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.25–1.58 (7H, m), 1.72–1.81 (3H, m), 1.78–1.82 (3H, m), 1.95 (2H, t, J = 11.2 Hz), 2.11 (3H, s), 2.31–2.35 (2H, m), 2.98 (2H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 4.08 (2H, s), 4.10 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.30–4.36 (4H, m), 7.28 (1H, s). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 14.02, 16.48, 20.84, 28.69, 35.39, 53.34, 58.72, 63.87, 64.45, 68.27, 107.79, 113.41, 125.34, 130.17, 138.86, 143.34, 165.46. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+, 363.1. HRMS: calc’d for C20H30N2O4 (M+ + H), 363.2284; found, 363.2279.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 7-chloro-8-(methylamino)-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (8)
N-Chlorosuccinimide (70 mg, 0.52 mmol) was added in portions to a stirred solution of 6 (190 mg, 0.52 mmol) in acetic acid (5 mL) at rt and left for 1 h. The acetic acid was evaporated off and the residue was basified with NaHCO3 solution and extracted thrice with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (MeOH-CH2Cl2, 1: 20 v/v) of the residue gave 8 as a pale yellow oil (80 mg, 38%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.29–1.35 (2H, m), 1.44–1.53 (4H, m), 1.75–1.80 (3H, m), 1.98 (2H, t, J = 11.2 Hz), 2.34–2.38 (2H, m), 3.00 (2H, d, J = 11.2 Hz), 3.12 (3H, d, J = 4.8 Hz), 4.10 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.28–4.36 (5H, m), 7.45 (1H, s). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 14.03, 20.84, 28.83, 28.97, 33.82, 35.42, 53.35, 58.76, 63.63, 64.26, 68.72, 109.54, 112.30, 124.79, 133.42, 140.14, 144.06, 164.27. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+, 397.6. HRMS: calc’d for C20H29ClN2O4 (M+ + H), 397.1894; found, 397.1886.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 7-bromo-8-(methylamino)-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (9)
The procedure for the synthesis of 8 was used with a solution of 6 (140 mg, 0.39 mmol) in acetic acid (4 mL) and with N-bromosuccinimide (70 mg, 0.39 mmol) replacing N-chlorosuccinimide, and gave 9 as a pale yellow oil (50 mg, 30%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.29–1.52 (6H, m), 1.73–1.78 (3H, m), 1.92 (2H, dt, J = 2.4, 11.6 Hz ), 2.29–2.33 (2H, m), 2.96 (2H, d, J = 11.2 Hz), 3.10 (3H, d, J = 5.2 Hz), 4.10 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.27–4.37 (5H, m), 7.62 (1H, s). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 14.09, 20.93, 29.11, 29.27, 34.11, 35.58, 53.48, 58.93, 63.60, 64.31, 68.96, 102.04, 110.64, 127.61, 133.67, 141.18, 144.76, 164.21. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+ 441.1. HRMS: calc’d for C20H2980BrN2O4 (M+ + H), 441.1389; found, 441.1368.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 7-iodo-8-(methylamino)-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (10)
The procedure for the synthesis of 8 was used with a solution of 6 (195 mg, 0.54 mmol) in acetic acid (4 mL) and with N-iodosuccinimide (122 mg, 0.54 mmol) replacing N-chlorosuccinimide to give 10 as a colorless oil (147 mg, 56%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.19–1.54 (6H, m), 1.72–1.80 (3H, m), 1.96 (2H, t, J = 11.2 Hz), 2.33–2.37 (2H, m), 3.00 (2H, d, J = 11.2 Hz), 3.07 (3H, d, J = 3.2 Hz), 4.05 (1H, bs), 4.09–4.11 (3H, m), 4.28–4.38 (4H, m), 7.84 (1H, s). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 14.06, 20.89, 28.91, 29.06, 34.50, 35.47, 53.39, 58.83, 63.57, 64.35, 68.88, 112.25, 133.12, 133.80, 143.57, 145.67, 164.02. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+, 489.2. HRMS: calc’d for C20H29IN2O4 (M+ + H), 489.1250; found, 489.1258.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 7-cyano-8-(methylamino)-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (11) 39
A mixture of 10 (140 mg, 0.29 mmol), KCN (21 mg, 0.32 mmol), CuI (6.0 mg, 0.029 mmol), 1,10-phenanthroline (11 mg, 0.057 mmol) in DMF (300 μL) was stirred at 110 °C in an oven-dried sealed tube under Ar for 48 h. The mixture was cooled to rt and then filtered through celite. The celite pad was rinsed twice with CH2Cl2. The combined filtrates were evaporated to dryness and then dissolved in MeOH. Separation by HPLC on an XTerra RP18 column (10 μm, 19 × 250 mm; Waters) eluted with MeOH-aq. NH4OH (0.025%) (9: 1 v/v) at 15 mL/min gave 11 (tR = 10.31 min; 8 mg, 7%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.25–1.52 (7H, m), 1.73–1.79 (3H, m), 1.90–1.96 (2H, t, J = 11.2 Hz), 2.30–2.34 (2H, m), 2.96 (2H, d, J = 11.2 Hz), 3.33 (3H, d, J = 5.2 Hz), 4.09 (2H, d, J = 6.0 Hz), 4.30–4.40 (4H, m), 5.04–5.06 (1H, m), 7.71 (1H, s). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 14.09, 20.92, 29.10, 29.26, 31.63, 35.53, 53.44, 58.91, 63.79, 64.61, 69.07, 85.21, 109.42, 119.52, 130.19, 131.81, 144.86, 145.98, 163.61. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+, 388.2. HRMS: calc’d for C21H29N3O4 (M+ + H), 388.2236; found, 388.2219.
Methyl 4-(benzyloxycarbonylamino)-2-methoxybenzoate (12b) 42
Saturated NaHCO3 solution (50 mL) and then CbzCl (1.70 mL, 12.1 mmol) were added to a solution of methyl 4-amino-2-methoxybenzoate (12a, 2.0 g, 11 mmol) in THF (50 mL). The mixture was stirred at rt for 4 h and then filtered through celite. The filtrate was acidified to pH < 1 and extracted with EtOAc. After concentration of this solution, the residue was purified by recrystallization from EtOAc-hexane to give 12b as a white solid (3.09 g, 89%). Mp: 132–134 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 3.84 (3H, s), 3.87 (3H, s), 5.19 (2H, s), 6.77 (1H, dd, J = 1.6, 8.4 Hz), 6.66, 7.11 (1H, s), 7.35–7.39 (5H, m). 7.79 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 51.84, 55.97, 67.30, 101.72, 109.43, 114.05, 128.32, 128.52, 128.68, 133.06, 135.67, 143.19, 152.96, 160.76, 166.07.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 4-amino-2-methoxybenzoate (12) 43
A THF solution of n-BuLi (1.6M; 612 μL, 0.98 mmol) was added drop-wise to a solution of (4-butylpiperidin-1-yl)methanol (190 mg, 1.11 mmol) in THF (3 mL) in an oven-dried flask under Ar at 0°C. After stirring the mixture for 10 min, a solution of 12b (350 mg, 1.11 mmol) in THF (3 mL) was added drop-wise. The mixture was stirrred for 2 h, poured into water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were dried on MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography of the residue (MeOH-CH2Cl2, 1: 15 v/v) gave a white solid (200 mg). MeOH (15 mL) was added to this solid (170 mg) plus Pd/C (10%; 25 mg). The mixture was degassed with H2 for 30 min, stirred at rt overnight, filtered and evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (MeOH-CH2Cl2, 1: 20 v/v) of the residue gave 12 as a colorless oil (108 mg, 36%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.91 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.28–1.53 (6H, m), 1.71–1.80 (3H, m), 1.95 (2H, t, J = 11.2 Hz), 2.31–2.35 (2H, m), 2.97 (2H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 3.81 (3H, s), 4.09 (2H, d, J = 6.0 Hz), 4.22 (2H, br), 6.18–6.22 (2H, m), 7.72 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 14.06, 20.88, 28.94, 29.07, 35.53, 53.45, 55.66, 58.84, 68.33, 97.58, 106.23, 108.78, 134.06, 152.29, 161.87, 165.63. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+, 321.1. HRMS: calc’d for C18H28N2O3 (M+ + H), 321.2178; found, 321.2181.
Methyl 4-amino-3-methoxybenzoate (13a)
Pd/C (10%; 1.8 g) and HCOOK (7.4 g, 88 mmol) were added to a solution of methyl 3-methoxy-4-nitrobenzoate (2.0 g, 9.5 mmol) in MeOH (50 mL). The mixture was refluxed at 80 °C for 1 h. The suspension was cooled and filtered through celite. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (30% EtOAc in hexane) of the residue gave 13a as a white solid (1.72 g, 100%). Mp: 127–129 °C. Lit. mp 127–128 °C.44 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 3.86 (3H, s), 3.90 (3H, s), 4.22 (2H, br), 4.45 (1H, s), 6.66 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.55 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 51.69, 55.58, 111.15, 113.09, 119.41, 124.09, 141.21, 146.10, 167.35.
Methyl 4-(benzyloxycarbonylamino)-3-methoxybenzoate (13b)
As described for 12b from 12a, 13b was obtained from 13a as a white solid (58%). Mp: 95–96 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 3.89 (6H, 2s), 5.22 (2H, s), 7.34–7.52 (6H, m), 7.69 (1H, dd, J = 1.6, 8.4 Hz), 8.20 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 52.05, 55.90, 67.27, 110.73, 116.92, 123.48, 124.25, 128.43, 128.49, 128.68, 132.06, 135.84, 146.96, 152.93, 166.81.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 4-amino-3-methoxybenzoate (13)
As described for 12 from 12b, compound 13 was obtained from 13b as a white solid in 13% yield. Mp: 162–164 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.94 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.31–1.39 (2H, m), 1.72–1.80 (2H, m), 1.95–1.99 (5H, br), 2.55 (2H, br), 2.75–2.79 (2H, m), 3.37 (2H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 3.90 (3H, s), 4.18 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz), 4.38 (2H, br), 6.69 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.43 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz), 7.52–7.53 (1H, dd, J = 1.6, 8 Hz); 13C-NMR: δ (CDCl3) 14.09, 20.94, 29.10, 29.25, 35.71, 53.50, 55.63, 58.94, 68.84, 111.21, 113.05, 119.75, 124.02, 141.09, 146.16, 166.86. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+, 321.3. HRMS: calc’d for C18H28N2O3 (M+ + H), 321.2178; found, 321.2190.
4-Amino-N-((1-butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl)-3-methoxybenzamide (14) 37
CDI (485 mg, 2.99 mmol) was added in portions to a suspension of 4-amino-3-methoxybenzoic acid (500 mg, 2.99 mmol) in MeCN (30 mL) in an oven-dried flask and then stirred for 2 h at rt. (1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methanamine (510 mg, 2.99 mmol) in MeCN (10 mL) was added drop-wise. The above solution was stirred overnight and evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (from 9% to 33%. MeOH in CH2Cl2) of the residue gave an oil which was then dissolved in MeCN and filtered through an Iso-Disc™ Filter (PTFE 25-4, 25 mm × 0.45 μm). The filtrate was dried to give 14 as a light brown foam-like oil (660 mg, 69%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.91 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.26–1.38 (4H, m), 1.42–1.48 (2H, m), 1.57–1.64 (1H, m), 1.88 (2H, dt, J = 2.0, 11.6 Hz), 2.27–2.31 (2H, m), 2.92 (2H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 3.30 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 3.86 (3H, s), 4.14 (2H, bs), 6.34 (1H, t, J = 5.6 Hz), 6.63 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.14 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 7.37 (1H, d, J = 1.6 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 12.58, 19.41, 27.72, 28.58, 34.79, 43.98, 52.06, 54.08, 57.36, 108.34, 111.67, 118.05, 122.76, 138.15, 145.21, 166.04. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+, 320.2. HRMS: calc’d for C18H30N3O2 (M+ + H), 320.2338; found, 320.2328.
(1-Propylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 4-amino-3-methoxybenzoate (15)
CDI (485 mg, 2.99 mmol) was added in portions to a suspension of 4-amino-3-methoxybenzoic acid (500 mg, 2.99 mmol) in MeCN (15 mL) in an oven-dried flask and stirred for 30 min at rt. Solvent was then evaporated off and the residue dissolved in anhydrous THF (7 mL). In another oven-dried flask, (1-propylpiperidin-4-yl)methanol (319 mg, 2.03 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous THF (7 mL) and cooled (ice-bath). A THF solution of n-BuLi (1.6M, 1.27 mL, 2.03 mmol) was added drop-wise to this solution and stirred for 10 min. The solution of CDI-activated acid was then added, stirred overnight and evaporated to dryness. The residue was diluted with water and extracted thrice with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were dried on MgSO4 and evaporated to dryess. Silica gel chromatography (MeOH-CH2Cl2, 1: 30 v/v) of the residue gave 15 as a yellow oil (312 mg, 50%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.89 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.37–1.56 (4H, m), 1.72–1.78 (2H, m), 1.94 (2H, dt, J = 2.0, 12.0 Hz), 2.25–2.29 (2H, m), 2.94 (2H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 3.86 (3H, s), 4.13 (2H, d, J = 6.0 Hz), 4.36 (2H, bs), 6.63 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.44 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 7.54 (1H, dd, J = 1.6, 8.0 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 12.05, 20.15, 29.06, 35.67, 53.40, 55.50, 61.09, 68.76, 111.08, 112.90, 119.35, 124.03, 141.31, 146.03, 166.83. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+, 307.2. HRMS: calc’d for C17H26N2O3 (M+ + H), 307.2022; found, 307.2022.
(1-Pentylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 4-amino-3-methoxybenzoate (16)
As described for 15, compound 16 was obtained from 4-amino-3-methoxybenzoic acid and 1-pentylpiperidin-4-yl)methanol as a pale yellow oil (200 mg, 30%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.89 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.24–1.52 (8H, m), 1.77–1.79 (3H, m), 1.89–1.95 (2H, dt, J = 2.4, 12 Hz), 1.95–2.32 (2H, m), 2.96 (2H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 3.89 (3H, s), 4.13 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.26 (2H, bs), 6.65 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz), 7.45 (1H, d, J = 1.6 Hz), 7.55 (1H, dd, J = 2, 8.4 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 14.06, 22.64, 26.78, 29.10, 29.94, 35.71, 53.49, 55.59, 59.23, 68.82, 111.16, 113.00, 119.61, 124.03, 141.17, 146.12, 166.86. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+ 335.2. HRMS: calc’d for C19H30N2O3(M+,+ H), 335.2335; found, 335.2325.
3-Bromo-5-fluoro-2-hydroxybenzoic acid (17a)
5-Fluoro-2-hydroxybenzoic acid (20 g, 0.13 mol) and N-bromosuccinimide (23 g, 0.13 mol) were added to acetic acid (200 mL). The mixture was heated at 80 °C for 24 h. After evaporation of all acetic acid, the residue was recrystalized from EtOAc and hexane to give 17a (27 g, 90%). Mp 233–235 °C. Lit. mp 233°C.45 1H-NMR (MeOD): δ 7.48–7.50 (2H, br). 13C-NMR (MeOD): δ 111.91 (d, J = 10.0 Hz), 114.92 (d, J = 7.0 Hz), 116.22 (d, J = 24.0 Hz), 127.13 (d, J = 26.0 Hz), 155.70 (d, J = 239 Hz), 156.56, 172.24.
5-Fluoro-2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid (17b) 46
NaOH solution (2.5M; 300 mL) was stirred under an aspirator for 2 h. Then CuSO4 (250 mg, 1.57 mmol) was added and the solution further stirred for 1h. To the filtrate of this solution was added 17a (22 g, 0.094 mol) and the mixture was refluxed overnight. The reaction mixture was cooled, acidified with 37% HCl to pH < 2 and then evaporated to dryness. The residue was dissoved in MeOH and filtered through celite. The combined filtrates were evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (30% EtOAc in hexane with 1% HOAc) of the residue gave 17b as a white solid (12 g, 75%). Mp 184–186 °C. 1H-NMR (MeOD): δ 6.58 (1H, dd, J = 3.2, 9.6 Hz), 7.01 (1H, dd, J = 3.0, 9.0 Hz). 13C-NMR (MeOD): δ 105.80 (d, J = 24.0 Hz), 109.44 (d, J = 26.0 Hz), 113.48 (d, J = 9.0 Hz), 148.36, 148.50 (d, J = 9.0 Hz), 156.24 (d, J = 234 Hz), 173.03. 19F-NMR (CDCl3): δ −125.39. HRMS: calc’d for C7H5FO4 (M+ + H), 172.01719; found, 172.01717.
Methyl 7-fluoro-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (17c) 47
TMSCHN2 (2.0M, 45 mL, 90 mmol) was added in portions to a solution of 17b (6.0 g, 35 mmol) in MeOH (150 mL) and Et2O (150 mL). After 20 min the solvent was evaporated off. Silica gel chromatography (15% EtOAc in hexane) of the residue gave the methyl ester (5.6 g, 93%). A mixture of this ester (3.9 g, 20 mmol) and Cs2CO3 (16.2 g, 49.8 mmol) in DMF (40 mL) was stirred at rt for 0.5 h. Then 1,2-dibromoethane (5.07 g, 27.0 mmol) was added and the mixture stirred at 80 °C for 16 h. The mixture was cooled to rt and filtered through celite, which was then rinsed twice with DMF. The combined DMF rinses were evaporated to dryness under high vacuum to give a dark red residue, which after silica gel chromatography (20% EtOAc in hexane with 1% HOAc) gave 17c as a white solid (3.37 g, 77%). Mp 108–110 °C. 1H-NMR (MeOD): δ 3.89 (3H, s), 4.28–4.34 (4H, m), 6.77 (1H, dd, J = 3.2, 8.8 Hz), 7.11 (1H, dd, J = 3.2, 8.8 Hz). 13C-NMR (MeOD): δ 52.27, 64.10, 64.30, 108.71 (d, J = 26.0 Hz), 109.73 (d, J = 24.0 Hz), 120.07 (d, J = 9.0 Hz), 140.65, 144.69 (d, J = 12.0 Hz), 155.69 (d, J = 238 Hz), 164.99. 19F-NMR (CDCl3): δ −121.14. HRMS: calc’d for C10H9FO4 (M+ + H), 213.0563; found, 213.0561.
Methyl 7-fluoro-8-nitro-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (17d)
17c (3.4 g, 15.9 mol) was added in portions to a flask cooled between −50 and −60 °C and containing HNO3 (90%; 30 mL). After 16 min, the reaction mixture was warmed gradually and water was added. The precipitate was filtered off and washed with water to give 17d as a yellow solid (3.58 g, 88%). 17d was used in the next step without further purification. Mp 133–135 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 3.92 (3H, s), 4.33–4.40 (4H, m), 6.83 (1H, d, J = 11.2 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 53.59, 64.22, 64.80, 107.12 (d, J = 25.0 Hz), 119.75 (d, J = 1.0 Hz), 137.57 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 148.50 (d, J = 12.0 Hz), 150.10 (d, J = 257 Hz), 162.83 (d, J = 3.0 Hz). 19F-NMR (CDCl3): δ −124.76. HRMS: calc’d for C10H8FNO6 (M+ + Na), 280.0233; found, 280.0225.
8-Amino-7-fluoro-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylic acid (17e)
Pd/C (10%, 340 mg) and potassium formate (1.4 g, 17 mmol) were added to a solution of 17d (500 mg, 1.94 mmol) in MeOH (10 mL). The mixture was refluxed at 80 °C for 2 h, and then cooled and filtered through celite. 37% HCl was added to the filtrate until no CO2 was released. The white solid was filtered off and the filtrate evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (MeOH-CH2Cl2, 1: 30 v/v) of the residue gave 17e as light brown solid (350 mg, 85%). Mp 174–176°C. 1H-NMR (MeOD): δ 4.08–4.10 (2H, m), 4.18–4.21 (2H, m), 6.67 (1H, d, J = 11.6 Hz). 13C-NMR (MeOD): δ 65.06, 66.29, 106.06 (d, J = 4.0 Hz), 109.21 (d, J = 23.0 Hz), 134.30 (d, J = 11.0 Hz), 134.44, 140.54 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 147.01 (d, J = 232 Hz), 169.25. 19F-NMR (MeOD): δ −143.14. HRMS: calc’d for C9H8FNO4 (M+ + H), 214.0516; found, 214.0510.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 8-amino-7-fluoro-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (17)
Saturated NaHCO3 solution (5 mL) and THF (20 mL), followed by CbzCl (662 mg, 3.87 mmol) were added to a flask containing 17e (750 mg, 3.52 mmol). After stirring the mixture overnight, the THF was evaporated off. The solution was diluted with water, acidified with 37% HCl to pH <1 and extracted thrice with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried on MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (30% EtOAc in hexane) of the residue gave Cbz-protected 17e as a white solid (420 mg, 34%).
Cbz-protected 17e (420 mg, 1.21 mmol), CDI (196 mg, 1.21 mmol) and MeCN (30 mL) were added to an oven-dried flask under Ar. The mixture was stirred for 2 h and evaporated to dryness. The residue was dissolved in THF (10 mL). In another oven-dried flask, a solution of (4-butylpiperidin-1-yl)methanol (207 mg, 1.21 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was added drop-wise to a THF solution of n-BuLi (1.6M; 760 μL, 1.21 mmol) under Ar at 0 °C and stirred at this temperature for 10 min. Then the activated acid in THF was added drop-wise to the prepared lithium alkoxide solution. The mixture was warmed to rt and stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was evaporated to remove THF, diluted with water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (MeOH-CH2Cl2, 1: 15 v/v) to give an oil. Pd/C (10%; 25 mg) was then added to a solution of the oil in MeOH (15 mL). The suspension was degassed for 30 min with H2 and then stirred at rt overnight under H2. The mixture was filtered through celite and evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (MeOH-CH2Cl2, 1: 15 v/v) of the residue gave 17 as a yellow solid (260 mg, 59%). Mp 160–162 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.95 (3H, t, J = 7.4 Hz), 1.33–1.39 (2H, m), 1.70–1.95 (7H, m), 2.39–2.42 (2H, m), 2.67–2.71 (2H, m), 3.31 (2H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 4.19–4.27 (6H, m), 4.88 (2H, s), 6.71 (1H, d, J = 11.6 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 13.74, 20.46, 26.97, 34.35, 52.56, 57.84, 63.84, 64.56, 68.14, 105.60 (d, J = 4.0 Hz), 108.19 (d, J = 23.0 Hz), 132.20 (d, J = 15.0 Hz), 133.43 (d, J = 11.0 Hz), 139.81 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 145.24 (d, J = 232 Hz), 166.72 (d, J = 4 Hz). 19F-NMR (CDCl3): δ −141.99. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+, 367.1. HRMS: calc’d for C19H27FN2O4 (M+ + H), 367.2033; found, 367.2033.
Methyl 4-amino-3-(fluoromethoxy)benzoate (18a) 48
Chlorofluoromethane was bubbled into a tube (30-mL) containing anhydrous DMF (10 mL), methyl 4-amino-3-hydroxybenzoate (500 mg, 2.99 mmol) and Cs2CO3 (1.95 g, 5.98 mmol) for 14 min at −70 ºC. The tube was then sealed and slowly warmed to rt. The mixture was stirred for 5 d then filtered through celite which was then rinsed thrice with EtOAc. The combined rinses were evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (20% EtOAc in hexane) of the residue gave 18a as a pale yellow solid (368 mg, 62%). Mp: 69–70 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 3.84 (3H, s), 4.46 (2H, br), 5.71 (2H, d, J = 54.4 Hz), 6.69 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz), 7.63 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz), 7.68 (1H, s). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 51.73, 100.22, 102.40, 114.25, 116.72, 119.23, 126.79, 142.44, 142.92, 142.95, 166.90. 19F-NMR (CDCl3): δ −147.56. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+ 200.1. HRMS: calc’d for C9H11FNO3 (M+ + H), 200.0723; found, 200.0723.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 4-amino-3-(fluoromethoxy)benzoate (18)
n-BuLi (1.6M; 1.6 mmol; 1 mL) was added drop-wise to a solution of (4-butylpiperidin-1-yl)methanol (280 mg, 1.64 mmol) in THF (2 mL) contained in an oven-dried flask under Ar at 0 °C. The solution was stirred for 10 min and 18a (160 mg, 0.80 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was added drop-wise. The mixture was stirred overnight, poured into water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were dried on MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (MeOH-CH2Cl2, 1: 20 v/v) of the residue gave 18 as a pale yellow oil (160 mg, 59 %). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.43–1.53 (6H, m), 1.75–1.80 (3H, m), 1.91–1.98 (2H, t, J = 12.0 Hz), 2.33 (2H, t, J = 8 Hz), 2.98 (2H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 4.14 (2H, d, J = 6.0 Hz), 4.28 (2H, br), 5.76 (2H, d, J = 54.4 Hz), 6.71 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.67 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 7.70 (1H, s). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 12.81, 19.65, 27.73, 27.89, 34.37, 52.18, 57.63, 67.66, 100.17 (d, J = 219 Hz), 113.04, 115.81, 118.78, 125.58, 140.86, 141.85 (d, J = 2.0 Hz), 165.00. 19F-NMR (CDCl3): δ −147.50. LC-MS m/z [M + H]+, 214.1. HRMS: calc’d for C18H28FN2O3 (M+ + H), 339.2084; found, 339.2088.
Methyl 4-amino-3-(2-fluoroethoxy)benzoate (19a)
1-Chloro-2-fluoroethane (760 mg, 8.97 mmol) was added to a tube (15-mL) containing anhydrous DMF (5 mL), methyl 4-amino-3-hydroxybenzoate (500 mg, 2.99 mmol) and Cs2CO3 (1.95 g, 5.98 mmol). The tube was sealed and stirred for 88 h. The mixture was then filtered through celite which was rinsed thrice with EtOAc. The combined filtrate and rinses were evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (20% EtOAc in hexane) of the residue gave 19a as a white solid (270 mg, 42%). Mp. 86–87 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 3.84 (3H, s), 4.18–4.27 (2H, dt, J = 28.4, 4 Hz), 4.39 (2H, br), 4.65–4.79 (2H, dt, J = 47.2, 3.7 Hz), 6.66 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz), 7.43 (1H, d, J = 1.6 Hz), 7.55 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz). 19F-NMR (CDCl3): δ −147.56. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+, 214.1. HRMS: calc’d for C10H13FNO3 (M+ + H), 214.0879; found, 214.0876.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 4-amino-3-(2-fluoroethoxy)benzoate (19)
As described for 18 from 18a, compound 19 was obtained from 19a as a white solid in 48% yield. Mp 72–74 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.27–1.53 (6H, m), 1.74–1.79 (3H, m), 1.94 (2H, t, J =12.0 Hz), 2.33 (2H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 2.97 (2H, d, J = 11.2 Hz), 4.13 (2H, d, J = 6 Hz), 4.24–4.33 (2H, dt, J = 28.4, 4.0 Hz), 4.36 (2H, br), 4.69–4.83 (2H, dt, J = 47.2, 4.0 Hz), 6.67 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.45 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 7.57 (1H, dd, J = 1.6, 8.4 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 14.07, 20.89, 29.03, 29.17, 35.65, 53.45, 58.88, 67.92 (d, J = 20.0 Hz), 68.82, 81.77 (d, J = 170 Hz), 112.94, 113.39, 119.45, 124.79, 141.70, 144.70, 166.67. 19F-NMR (CDCl3): δ −147.49. LC-MS m/z [M + H]+, 353.2. HRMS: calc’d for C19H30FN2O3 (M+ + H), 353.2240; found, 353.2238.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 4-amino-3-hydroxybenzoate (20) 49,50
AlCl3 (311 mg, 2.34 mmol) and NaI (351 mg, 2.34 mmol) were added to a solution of 13 (500 mg, 1.56 mmol) in MeCN (10 mL). The mixture was refluxed overnight and extracted thrice with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried on MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (MeOH/CH2Cl2, 1:20 v/v) of the residue gave 20 as an orange-brown solid (200 mg, 42%). Mp: 210–212 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.98 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.31–1.43 (2H, m), 1.51–1.63 (4H, m), 1.87–1.93 (3H, m), 2.28 (2H, t, J = 11.2 Hz), 2.54–2.58 (2H, m), 3.17 (2H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.14 (2H, d, J = 5.6 Hz), 6.68 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.34 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 7.38–7.41 (1H, dd, J = 1.6, 8.0 Hz); 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 13.96, 21.05, 27.46, 34.81, 53.45, 58.09, 68.05, 114.47, 116.05, 119.06, 124.34, 143.61, 144.84, 168.55. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+, 307.2. HRMS: calc’d for C17H26N2O3 (M+ + H), 307.2022; found, 307.2025.
(1-Butylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl 8-amino-7-nitro-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-5-carboxylate (21)
A mixture of 21a51(200 mg, 0.79 mmol), (Boc)2O (515 mg, 2.36 mmol) and DMAP (44 mg, 0.039 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) was refluxed at 50 °C for 1 h, then quenched with water and extracted thrice with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were dried on MgSO4 and then condensed to a crude product, which after silica gel chromatography (30% EtOAc in hexane) gave di-Boc-protected 21a as a yellow solid (21b; 343 mg, 95%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.41 (18H, s), 3.94 (3H, s), 4.37–4.49 (4H, m), 8.30 (1H, s). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 27.78, 52.63, 63.77, 64.80, 83.66, 118.16, 120.06, 126.55, 138.19, 140.71, 148.53, 149.49, 163.61.
A THF solution of n-BuLi (1.6M; 0.95 mL, 1.52 mmol) was added drop-wise to a solution of (4-butylpiperidin-1-yl)methanol (260 mg, 1.52 mmol) in THF (2 mL) in an oven-dried flask, under Ar at 0 °C. After stirring this solution for 10 min, a solution of 21b (343 mg, 0.76 mmol) in THF (4 mL) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred overnight, poured into water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were dried on MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness. Silica gel chromatography (MeOH/CH2Cl2, 1: 15 v/v) of the residue gave mono-Boc-protected 21 as a white solid (21c; 186 mg, 50%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.29–1.49 (15H, m), 1.78 (3H, t, J =12.4 Hz), 1.93 (2H, t, J =10.0 Hz), 2.31 (2H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 2.96 (2H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 4.16 (2H, d, J= 6.4 Hz), 4.39–4.48 (4H, m), 7.20 (1H, br), 8.15 (1H, s). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 13.06, 19.88, 27.05, 28.01, 28.24, 34.43, 52.34, 57.85, 62.79, 63.70, 68.82, 81.43, 119.75, 124.57, 134.69, 135.44, 146.92, 150.51, 162.21.
21c (100 mg, 0.20 mmol) was stirred overnight in a dioxane solution of HCl (4M). The mixture was evaporated to dryness, diluted with water and then neutralized to pH 7 with aq. NH4OH (1M). The solution was extracted thrice with CH2Cl2. The organic layers were combined and dried on MgSO4. Evaporation of solvent gave 21 as a yellow solid (71 mg, 89%). Mp 108–110 °C (n = 2). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.29–1.51 (7H, m), 1.79 (3H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 1.92 (2H, t, J = 11.6 Hz), 2.33 (2H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 2.98 (2H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 4.14 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.38–4.46 (4H, m), 8.45 (1H, s). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 14.06, 20.89, 28.99, 29.16, 35.47, 53.38, 58.85, 63.82, 64.84, 69.28, 108.62, 123.12, 125.47, 130.17, 139.42, 147.16, 163.70. LC-MS: m/z [M + H]+, 394.2. HRMS: calc’d for C19H28N3O6 (M+ + H), 394.1978; found, 394.1972.
Pharmacological Assay and Screen
Some ligands (1, 5, 8, 13, 15, 17–19) were evaluated at Caliper Life Sciences (Hanover, MD) for binding to 5-HT4 receptors in guinea pig striatal membranes at 37 °C with [3H]GR 113808 as reference radioligand.52
All new ligands (2, 3 and 5–21) plus the already known ligands 1 and 4 were submitted to the National Institute of Mental Health Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (NIMH-PDSP) for assessment of binding affinity to human recombinant 5-HT4 receptors (reference radioligand, [3H]GR 113808) and a wide range of other receptors and binding sites (5-HT1A-1E, 2A-2C, 3, 5A, 6, 7, α1A, 1B, 1D, 2A-2C, BZP (rat brain site), β1–3, σ1,2, D1-5, DAT, DOR, GABAA, H1-4, KOR, M1-5, MOR, NET and SERT). Selected ligands (1, 4, 6–13 and 17) were also assessed for agonist/partial agonist activity in a GloSensor L9 assay for cAMP response and for antagonist activity. Detailed assay protocols are available at the NIMH-PDSP web site (http://pdsp.cwru.edu).
Radiochemistry
Production of NCA [11C]carbon dioxide
No-carrier-added (NCA) [11C]carbon dioxide was produced with a PEtrace cyclotron (GE; Milwaukee, WI) according to the 14N(p,α)11C reaction20 by irradiation of nitrogen gas (300 psi) containing 1% oxygen with a proton beam (16.5 MeV, 45 DA) for either 20 or 40 min. A 40-min irradiation produced about 2.0 Ci of [11C]carbon dioxide.
Production of NCA [11C]hydrogen cyanide20
A PETrace Radiotracer Production System was used to produce this labeling agent, as follows. Cyclotron-produced NCA [11C]carbon dioxide was trapped on molecular sieve (13 Å, 80–100 mesh; 0.55g) at 40 °C, while residual [13N]nitrogen was directed to waste. The [11C]carbon dioxide was then released with a stream of nitrogen (250 mL/min), mixed with a stream of hydrogen (30 mL/min) and passed through a heated (400 °C) glass tube (10 mm × 200 mm) containing nickel catalyst (Ni-3266 Engelhardt). The effluent containing the generated [11C]methane was passed through an OXY-TRAP® (PNr.-4001R; Alltech), mixed with anhydrous ammonia (research grade, 20 ml/min) and then passed over a wad of platinum wire (d 0.127 mm; 2.6 g) at 920 °C. The generated [11C]hydrogen cyanide was delivered to a hot-cell for subsequent radiochemistry in a mixture of hydrogen, ammonia, and nitrogen carrier gas at 300 mL/min.
Production of NCA [11C]methyl iodide
NCA [11C]methyl iodide was produced from NCA [11C]carbon dioxide (~ 2.0 Ci) via reduction to [11C]methane and then vapour phase iodination18, either in a TRACERlab FX C Pro module (GE; Milwaukee, WI) for the synthesis of [11C]8 or a MeI MicroLab apparatus (GE; Milwaukee, WI)for the synthesis of [ 11C]13.
Production of NCA [11C]methyl triflate
A quartz column (i.d. 2.6 mm, length 26 cm) was packed around its center with a 6 cm length of AgOTf/Graphac (50: 50 w/w/) held in place at each end with glass wool. NCA [11C]methyl triflate (~ 350 mCi) was produced by passing [11C]methyl iodide in helium gas (17 mL/min) into the heated (180 °C) column.19
Production of NCA [18F]d2-fluoromethyl bromide53
Cyclotron-produced [18F]fluoride ion (~ 150 mCi) in [18O]water was delivered into a glass vial containing K 2.2.2 (5.0 mg, 13.3 μmol) and potassium carbonate (0.50 mg, 3.6 μmol) in MeCN-H2O (0.1 mL, 9: 1 v/v). This solution was transferred to a modified version of a TRACERlab FXF-N module and diluted with MeCN (1 mL). The mixture was evaporated to dryness at 90 ºC under reduced pressure with a nitrogen flow. MeCN (2 mL) was again added and then evaporated to dryness. The vessel was sealed and then CD2Br2 (100 μL) in MeCN (1.0 mL) was added to the dry [18F]fluoride ion-K 2.2.2-K+ complex which was then heated at 95 ºC for 15 min. The reaction vessel was then cooled to 35 ºC. Nitrogen gas was used to transfer the volatile [18F]d2-fluoromethyl bromide through a series of four silica gel cartridges (SepPak Plus) and then into a V-vial (1-mL) having a crimp-sealed silicon-Teflon septum cap. The RCY of [18F]d2-fluoromethyl bromide was typically about 28%.53
Radiosynthesis of [11C]5
NCA [11C]hydrogen cyanide (~ 200 mCi) was trapped in a V-vial (5-mL) containing THF (500 μL), precursor (1, ~ 1.0 mg), Pd(PPh3)4 (1.5–2.0 mg), base [K2CO3 (~ 2.0 mg) plus K 2.2.2 (~ 5.0 mg), or usually KH2PO4 (~ 2.0 mg) only]. The reaction mixture was heated at 80 ºC for 5 min. HPLC mobile phase (3 mL) was added to the V-vial and [11C]5 isolated with radio-HPLC on a Gemini C18 column (5 μm, 10 × 250 mm; MeCN-aq. NH4OH (10 mM; 3: 2 v/v; 6 mL/min; tR = 7.2 min). The identity of [11C]5 was confirmed by analytical radio-HPLC on a Gemini C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 150 mm) eluted at 1 mL/min with MeCN-10 mM NH4OH (16: 9 v/v; tR = 5.8 min) and also by LC-MS of associated carrier. The radiochemical purity of [11C]5 was > 99%. The decay-corrected radiochemical yield (RCY) from [11C]hydrogen cyanide was 26% (n = 3).
Radiosynthesis of [11C]8
[11C]Methyl iodide (~ 15 mCi) was trapped in a capped fluoro-polymer custom-made reaction vial (1.5-mL) containing anhydrous DMF (300 μL), precursor (3, ~ 1.0 mg) and base (Li3N or Li2O; ~ 5.0 mg). The mixture was sonicated in an ultrasound apparatus (UIS250L, Hielscher Ultrasonics, Germany) for 10 min and then filtered through an Iso-DiscTM filter (PFTE13-4, 13 mm × 0.45 μm) which was then rinsed twice with DMF. The combined filtrates were diluted with water and then the [11C]8 was isolated with radio-HPLC (MeCN-HCOONH4; 2: 3 v/v; 3 mL/min; tR = 13.1 min). The identity of [11C]8 was confirmed by analytical radio-HPLC on a Gemini-NX C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm) eluted with MeCN-100 mM HCOONH4 (16: 9 v/v) at 1 mL/min (tR = 7.0 min) and also by LC-MS of associated carrier. The RCYs from [11C]methyl iodide were 7% (Li2O) and 11% (Li3N).
Radiosynthesis of [11C]13 from [11C]methyl triflate
[11C]Methyl triflate (30–20 mCi) was trapped in a tapered bottom vial (0.9-mL) containing 20 (0.15–0.8 mg), 0.5M NaOH (3 eq.) and MeCN (300 μL). The mixture was heated at 80 ºC for 5 min, diluted with HPLC mobile phase (500 μL), and then the [11C]13 (tR = 8.7 min) isolated with radio-HPLC (MeCN-HCOONH4; 2: 3 v/v; 4 mL/min). The identity of [11C]13 was confirmed by analytical radio-HPLC on a Gemini-NX C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm) eluted with MeCN-100 mM HCOONH4 (2: 3 v/v) at 1 mL/min (tR = 4.4 min) and also by LC-MS of associated carrier. The RCY was 27% (n = 12) from [11C]methyl triflate and the radiochemical purity > 99%. The absorbance detector response of the analytical HPLC system was calibrated for mass of carrier ligand 13. This allowed the mass of 13 in measured samples of [11C]13 to be determined, and the specific radioactivity to be calculated. The specific radioactivity was 2,517 mCi/μmol at end of synthesis (EOS).
Radiosynthesis of [11C]13 from [11C]methyl iodide
[11C]Methyl iodide (30–550 mCi) was trapped in a tapered bottom vial (0.9-mL) containing 20 (~ 1.0 mg, 3.2 μmol), 1.0M (n-Bu)4NOH (3 eq., 10 μL, 3.2 μmol) and DMF (300 μL). The mixture was heated at 80 ºC for 5 min and then diluted with water (500 μL). [11C]13 was separated and analyzed as described above. The RCY of [11C]13 from [11C]iodomethane was 36% (n = 6) and the radiochemical purity > 99%. The specific radioactivity was 2,848 mCi/μmol at EOS.
The following experiment22 was performed to confirm the position of radiolabel in [11C]13. [11C]Methyl iodide (~ 47 mCi) was trapped in a solution of 20 (~ 1.0 mg) in DMF (300 μL). Then [13C]methyl iodide (10 μL from 47.7 mM stock solution in DMF) was added. [11C]/[13C]13 was isolated by HPLC, as described above. A sample of the collected radioactive fraction was then analyzed by HPLC and LC-MS. The radioactive fraction was then evaporated to dryness, dissolved in CDCl3 and, analyzed by 13C-NMR{DEPT 135}.
Radiosynthesis of [18F]18
Phenol 20 (~ 0.15 mg, 0.49 umol), MeCN (300 μL) and 0.5M NaOH (1.5 μmol, 3 μL) were added to a V-vial (1-mL). [18F]FCD2Br (~ 20 mCi) was transferred to the solution under computer control from a TRACERlab FXF-N module. Radioactivity transfer was monitored by two external radioactivitydetectors (Bioscan) and was stopped when radioactivity maximized. The mixture was heated at 100 ºC for 15 min and then diluted with water (700 μL). [18F]18 was isolated with HPLC (MeCN-HCOONH4; 2: 3 v/v; 3 mL/min; tR = 10.1 min). The identity of [18F]18 was confirmed by analytical HPLC on a Gemini-NX C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm) eluted with MeCN-100 mM HCOONH4 (1: 1 v/v) at 1 mL/min (tR = 4.2 min) and also by LC-MS. The RCY of [18F]18 was 13% (n = 1) from [18F]fluoride ion and the radiochemical purity > 99%.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), specifically the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). We thank the NIH PET Department for radioisotope production and the NIMH Psychoactive Screening Program (PDSP) for performing assays; the PDSP is directed by Bryan L. Roth, PhD with project officer Jamie Driscol (NIMH), at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (contract # NO1MH32004). We thank our colleagues, Drs. Lisheng Cai and Joong-Hyun Chun, for useful suggestions and technical assistance in some areas of this work.
Abbreviations
- BZP
peripheral benzodiazepine receptor
- Cbz
benzyloxycarbonyl
- CDI
N,N’-carbonyldiimidazole
- D
dopamine
- DAT
dopamine transporter
- DOR
δ opiate receptor
- DMAP
4-(dimethylamino)pyridine
- DMF
dimethylformamide
- EOS
end of synthesis
- H
histamine
- K 2.2.2
4,7,13,18-tetraoxo-1,10-diazabicyclo[8,8,8]hexacosane
- M
muscarinic
- MOR
μ opiate receptor
- NBS
N-bromo-succinimide
- NCA
no-carrier-added
- NET
noradrenalin transporter
- NMP
N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone
- NXS
N-halo-succinimide (X = halo atom)
- PET
positron emission tomography
- rt
room temperature
- RCY
decay-corrected radiochemical yield
- SERT
serotonin transporter
- SPECT
single photon emission computed tomography
- THF
tetrahydrofuran
- TMS
trimethylsilyl
- TPP
triphenylphosphine
- 5-HT
serotonin
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: The chemical purities of compounds 1–21 and their HPLC methods of determination. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Wong DF, Gründer G, Brašić JR. Brain imaging research: does the science serve clinical practice? Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007;19:541–558. doi: 10.1080/09540260701564849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gibson RE, Burns HD, Hamill TG, Eng WS, Francis BE, Ryan C. Non-invasive radiotracer imaging as a tool for drug development. Curr Radiopharm Design. 2000;6:973–989. doi: 10.2174/1381612003399987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eglen RM, Wong EHF, Dumuis A, Bockaert J. Central 5-HT4 receptors. TiPs. 1995;16:391–398. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)89081-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Langlois M, Fischmeister R. 5-HT4 receptor ligands: applications and new perspectives. J Med Chem. 2003;46:319–344. doi: 10.1021/jm020099f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eglen RM, Hegde SS. 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT4) receptors: physiology, pharmacology and therapeutic potential. Exp Opin Invest Drugs. 1996;5:373–388. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Warner-Schmidt JL, Flajolet M, Maller A, Chen EY, Qi HS, Svenningsson P, Greengard P. Role of p11 in cellular and behavioral effects of 5-HT4 receptor stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009;29:1937–1946. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5343-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Waterhouse RN. Determination of lipophilicity and its use as a predictor of blood brain barrier penetration of molecular imaging agents. Mol Imaging Biol. 2005;5:376–389. doi: 10.1016/j.mibio.2003.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pike VW. PET Radiotracers: crossing the blood-brain barrier and surviving metabolism. TiPs. 2009;30:431–440. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pike VW. Positron-emitting radioligands for studies in vivo — probes for human psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacology. 1993;7:139–158. doi: 10.1177/026988119300700202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Laruelle M, Slifstein M, Huang Y. Relationships between radiotracer properties and image quality in molecular imaging of the brain with positron emission tomography. Mol Imaging Biol. 2003;5:363–375. doi: 10.1016/j.mibio.2003.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kaumann AJ, Gaster LM, King FD, Brown AM. Blockade of human atrial 5- HT4 receptors by SB 207710, a selective and high affinity 5-HT4 receptor antagonist. Nauyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1994;349:546–548. doi: 10.1007/BF00169146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McLean PG, Coupar IM. 5-HT4 receptor antagonist affinities of SB207710, SB205008, and SB203186 in the human colon, rat oesophagus, and guinea pig ileum peristaltic reflex. Nauyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1995;352:132–140. doi: 10.1007/BF00176766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pike VW, Halldin C, Nobuhara K, Hiltunen J, Mulligan RS, Swahn CG, Karlsson P, Olsson H, Hume SP, Hirani E, Whalley J, Pilowsky LS, Larson S, Schnell PO, Ell PJ, Farde L. Radioiodinated SB 207710 as a radioligand in vivo: imaging of brain 5-HT4 receptors with SPET. Eur J Nucl Med & Mol Imaging. 2003;30:1520–1528. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1307-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kornum BR, Lind NM, Gillings N, Marner L, Andersen F, Knudsen GM. Evaluation of the novel 5-HT4 receptor PET ligand [11C]SB207145 in the Gottingen mini-pig. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29:186–196. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gee AD, Martarello L, Passchier J, Wishart M, Parker C, Matthews J, Comley R, Hopper R, Gunn R. Synthesis and evaluation of [11C]SB207145 as the first in vivo serotonin 5-HT4 receptor radioligand for PET imaging in man. Curr Radiopharm. 2008;1:110–114. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Marner L, Gillings N, Comley RA, Baarré WFC, Rabiner EA, Wilson AA, Houle S, Hasselbalch SG, Svarer C, Gunn RN, Laruelle M, Knudsen GM. Kinetic modeling of 11C-SB207145 binding to 5-HT4 receptor in the human brain in vivo. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:900–908. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.058552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rappaport SI, Ohno K, Pettigrew KD. Drug entry into the brain. Brain Research. 1979;172:254. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90546-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Larsen P, Ulin J, Dahlström K, Jensen M. Synthesis of [11C]iodomethane by iodination of [11C]methane. Appl Radiat Isot. 1997;48:153–157. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jewett DM. A simple synthesis of [11C]methyl triflate. Appl Radiat Isot. 1992;43:1383–1385. doi: 10.1016/0883-2889(92)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Christman DR, Finn RD, Karlström K, Wolf AP. The production of ultra high specific activity 11C-labeled hydrogen cyanide, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and methane via the 14N(p,α)11C reaction. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1975;26:435–442. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Donohue SR, Pike VW, Finnema SJ, Truong P, Andersson J, Gulyás B, Halldin C. Discovery and labeling of high affinity 3,4-diarylpyrazolines as candidate radioligands for in vivo imaging of cannabinoid subtype-1 (CB1) receptors. J Med Chem. 2008;51:5608–5616. doi: 10.1021/jm800329z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Luthra SK, Pike VW, Brady F, Turton DR, Wood B, Matthews RW, Hawkes GE. The utility of 13C/11C-co-labelling and subsequent 13C-NMR in the characterisation of 11C-labelled products. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 1987;25:1070–1072. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vickery RG, Mai N, Kaufman E, Beattie DT, Pulido-Rios T, O’Keefe M, Humphrey PPA, Smith JAM. A comparison of the pharmacological properties of guinea pig and human recombinant 5-HT4 receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;150:782– 791. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Clark RD. Medicinal chemistry of 5-HT4 receptor ligands. In: Eglen RM, editor. 5-HT4 Receptors in the brain and periphery. Ch 1. Landes Bioscience; Austin, TX, USA: 1997. pp. 1–48. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gaster LM, Jennings AJ, Joiner GF, King FD, Mulholland KR, Rahman SK, Starr S, Wyman PA, Wardle KA, Wardle ESE, Gareth JS. (1-Butyl-4-piperidinyl)methyl 8-amino-7-chloro-1,4-benzodioxane-5-carboxylate hydrochloride: a highly potent and selective 5-HT4 receptor antagonist derived from metoclopramide. J Med Chem. 1993;36:4121–4123. doi: 10.1021/jm00077a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McCarron JA, Zoghbi SS, Shetty SS, Ichise M, Vermeulen ES, Wikström HV, Halldin C, Innis RB, Pike VW. Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of [11C](-)-RWAY in monkey - a new simply labeled PET radioligand for imaging brain 5-HT1A receptors. Eur J Nucl Med & Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1670–1682. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0460-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kenakin T. Efficacy as a vector: the relative prevalence and paucity of inverse agonism. Mol Pharmacol. 2004;66:2–11. doi: 10.1124/mol.65.1.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kursar JD, Nelson DL, Wainscott DB, Baez M. Molecular cloning, functional expression, and mRNA tissue distribution of the human 5-hydroxytryptamine2B receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 1994;46:227–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Duxon MS, Flanigan TP, Reavley AC, Baxter GS, Blackburn TP, Fone KCF. Evidence for expression of the 5-hydroxytryptamine-2B receptor in the rat central nervous system. Neurosci. 1997;76:323–329. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(96)00480-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hashimoto K, Ishiwata K. Sigma receptor ligands: possible application as therapeutic drugs and as radiopharmaceuticals. Curr Pharmaceutical Design. 2006;12:3857–3876. doi: 10.2174/138161206778559614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Marazziti D, Baroni S, Masala I, Ginnaccini G, Betti L, Palego L, Dell’Osso MC, Consoli G, Castagna M, Lucacchini A. [3H]-YM-09151-2 binding sites in human brain post mortem. Neurochem Int. 2009;55:643–647. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2009.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Marazziti D, Lucacchini A, Baroni S, Betti L, Catena M, Ginnaccini G, Dell’Osso B, Masala I, Mungai F, Dell’Osso L. Presence of D4 dopamine receptors in human prefrontal cortex: a post mortem study. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria. 2007;29:148–152. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462007000200011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cai L, Lu S, Pike VW. Chemistry with [18F]fluoride ion. Eur J Org Chem. 2008;17:2853–2873. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pike VW, Aigbirhio FI. Reactions of cyclotron-produced [18F]fluoride with diaryliodonium salts — a novel single-step route to no-carrier-added [18F]fluoroarenes. J Chem Soc, Chem Commun. 1995:2215–2216. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hamill T, Burns H, Eng W, Ryan C, Krause S, Gibson R, Hargreaves R. An improved fluorine-18 labeled neurokinin-1 receptor ligand. Mol Imaging Biol. 2002;4(Suppl 1):S34. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schou M, Halldin C, Sovago J, Pike VW, Gulyas B, Mozley D, Dobson D, Johnson PD, Innis RB, Farde L. Evaluation of two fluorinated reboxetine analogs as potential norepinephrine transporter probes in the monkey brain with PET. Synapse. 2004;53:57–67. doi: 10.1002/syn.20031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Terry GE, Hirvonen J, Liow JS, Zoghbi SS, Gladding R, Tauscher JT, Schaus JM, Phebus L, Felder CC, Morse CL, Donohue SR, Pike VW, Halldin C, Innis RB. Imaging and quantitation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in human and monkey brain using 18F-labeled inverse agonist radioligands. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:112–120. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.067074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.King FD, Gaster LM, Mulholland KR, Rahman SK, Wyman PA, Sanger GJ, Wardle KA, Baxter GS, Kennett GA, Kaumann AJ. 5-HT4 receptor antagonists. 5,580,885. US Patent. 1996
- 39.Kowalczyk BA, Robinson J, III, Gardner JO. Process development of the synthetic route to sulamserod hydrochloride. Org Process Res Dev. 2001;5:116–121. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cristau H-J, Ouali A, Spindler J-F, Taillefer M. Mild and efficient copper-catalyzed cyanation of aryl iodides and bromides. Chem Eur J. 2005;11:2483–2492. doi: 10.1002/chem.200400979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sellarajah S, Lekishvili T, Bowring C, Thompsett AR, Rudyk H, Birkett CR, Brown DR, Gilbert IH. Synthesis of analogues of Congo Red and evaluation of their anti-prion activity. J Med Chem. 2004;47:5515–5534. doi: 10.1021/jm049922t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hudgens TL, Turnbull KD. C-methylation of phenols, tyrosine derivatives, and a tyrosine containing peptide. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:2719–2722. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Qiao C, Gupte A, Boshoff HI, Wilson DJ, Bennett EM, Somu RV, Barry CE, Aldrich CC. 5′-O-[(N-Acyl)sulfamoyl]adenosines as antitubercular agents that inhibit MbtA: an adenylation enzyme required for siderophore biosynthesis of the mycobactins. J Med Chem. 2007;50:6080–6094. doi: 10.1021/jm070905o. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Meth-Cohn O. Transesterification of methyl esters of aromatic and α, β-ansaturated acids with bulky alcohols: (D)-menthyl cinnamate and (D)-menthyl nicotinate. Organic Syntheses. 1990;68:155–157. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Eaborn C, Hornfeld HL, Walton DRM. Preparation of some aryltrialkyl- and tetraaryl stannanes. J Organometal Chem. 1967;10:529–530. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Duda H, Ostaszynski A, Urbanski T. Halosalicylohydroxamic acids. I. Dihalosalicylohydroxamic acids. Bull Acad Pol Sci, Ser Sci Chim. 1965;13:341–347. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Weller DD, Stirchak EP. Quassinoid synthesis via o-quinone Diels-Alder reactions. J Org Chem. 1983;48:4873–4879. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fukuda Y, Seto S, Furuta H, Ebisu H, Oomori Y, Terashima S. Novel seco cyclopropa[c]pyrrolo[3,2-e]indole bisalkylators bearing a 3,3′-arylenebisacryloyl group as a linker. J Med Chem. 2001;44:1396–1406. doi: 10.1021/jm000107x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hamill TG, McCauley JA, Burns HD. The synthesis of a benzamidine-containing NR2B-selective NMDA receptor ligand labelled with tritium or fluorine-18. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2005;48:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yadav JS, Reddy BVS, Madan Ch, Hashim SR. A mild and chemoselective dealkylation of alkyl aryl ethers by cerium(III) chloride-NaI. Chem Lett. 2000;29:738– 739. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ghiaci M, Asghari J. Dealkylation of alkyl and aryl ethers with AlCl3-NaI in the absence of solvent. Synth Commun. 1999;29:973–979. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gaster LM, Wyman PA. Preparation of aminoalkyl tricyclic heterocyclecarboxylates as 5-HT4 receptor antagonists. WO 9417071 A1 19940804 PCT Int Appl. 1994
- 53.Grossman CJ, Gale JD, Bunce KT, Kilpatrick GJ, Whitehead JWF, Oxford AW, Humphrey PPA. Development of a radioligand binding assay for 5HT4 receptors in guinea pig and rat brain. Brit J Phamacol. 1993;109:618–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1993.tb13617.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chin FT, Morse CL, Shetty HU, Pike VW. Automated radiosynthesis of [18F]SPA-RQ for imaging human brain NK1 receptors with PET. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2006;49:17–31. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.