Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;143(3):228-232.
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Apr 16.

Centralization of noxious stimulus-induced analgesia (NSIA) is related to activity at inhibitory synapses in the spinal cord

Claudia H Tambeli  1 , Jon D Levine, Robert W Gear
Affiliations

Centralization of noxious stimulus-induced analgesia (NSIA) is related to activity at inhibitory synapses in the spinal cord

Claudia H Tambeli et al. Pain. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

The duration of noxious stimulus-induced antinociception (NSIA) has been shown to outlast the pain stimulus that elicited it, however, the mechanism that determines the duration of analgesia is unknown. We evaluated the role of spinal excitatory and inhibitory receptors (NMDA, mGluR(5), mu-opioid, GABA(A), and GABA(B)), previously implicated in NSIA initiation, in its maintenance. As in our previous studies, the supraspinal trigeminal jaw-opening reflex (JOR) in the rat was used for nociceptive testing because of its remoteness from the region of drug application, the lumbar spinal cord. NSIA was reversed by antagonists for two inhibitory receptors (GABA(B) and mu-opioid) but not by antagonists for either of the two excitatory receptors (NMDA and mGluR(5)), indicating that NSIA is maintained by ongoing activity at inhibitory synapses in the spinal cord. Furthermore, spinal administration of the GABA(B) agonist baclofen mimicked NSIA in that it could be blocked by prior injection of the mu-opioid receptor antagonist H-D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2) (CTAP) in nucleus accumbens. CTAP also blocked baclofen antinociception when administered in the spinal cord. We conclude that analgesia induced by noxious stimulation is maintained by activity in spinal inhibitory receptors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Effect of excitatory receptor antagonists
Capsaicin (Cap) was administered immediately after the last baseline recording. The antagonist or vehicle (PBS) was administered intrathecally immediately after the recording at 30 minutes. Compared to PBS (n=8), neither the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist LY367385 (n=5) nor the mGluR5 receptor antagonist MPEP (n=5) significantly affected NSIA. In this and subsequent figures data are presented as percentage attenuation of the JOR EMG (mean ± s.e.m.); see Methods for additional details regarding data presentation and analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effect of inhibitory receptor antagonists
Capsaicin (Cap) was administered immediately after the last baseline recording. Follow capsaicin administration, the antagonist or vehicle (PBS, n=8) was administered intrathecally immediately after the recording at 30 minutes. A. The selective μ-opioid receptor antagonist CTAP (n=4) significantly reversed capsaicin-induced attenuation of the JOR. B. The selective GABAB-receptor antagonist CGP35348 (n=8) significantly reversed capsaicin-induced attenuation of the JOR. C. The GABAA-receptor antagonist bicuculline (n=6) did not significantly reverse capsaicin-induced attenuation of the JOR.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Effect of GABAB receptor agonist baclofen
Baclofen injected i.t. as a single agent significantly attenuated the JOR (n=6), an effect that was blocked by prior administration of CTAP into nucleus accumbens (n=6) or by intrathecal co-administration of CTAP with baclofen (n=6).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of proposed spinal NSIA circuit
Top panel. Under basal conditions, in the absence of noxious stimulation, tonically active neurons (red) project supraspinally to inhibit accumbens (“NAc”)-mediated antinociception. Note lack of activity in the incoming primary afferent nociceptor (“PAN”) and the inhibitory interneuron (both black). The activity in the ascending neuron results from ongoing glutamatergic synaptic input arising from an unknown intrinsic source [30]. Middle panel. When noxious stimulation, depicted as a red chili pepper, is applied, activating the PAN (now red), the inhibitory interneuron (also now red) is activated by various glutamate receptors. Activity in this neuron in turn inhibits activity in the ascending neuron (now black), thereby disinhibiting accumbens-mediated antinociception (i.e., NSIA). Bottom panel. After cessation of primary afferent nociceptor (“PAN”) activity (now black), the inhibitory interneuron remains active (red), maintaining tonic inhibition of the ascending neuron (black). This decoupling of the inhibitory interneuron from peripheral input is what we refer to as “centralization.”
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ahn DK, Kim YS, Park JS. Central NO is involved in the antinociceptive action of intracisternal antidepressants in freely moving rats. Neurosci Lett. 1998;243:105–8. - PubMed
    1. Banks D, Kuriakose M, Matthews B. Modulation by peripheral conditioning stimuli of the responses of trigeminal brain stem neurones and of the jaw opening reflex to tooth pulp stimulation in chronically prepared, anaesthetized cats. Exp Physiol. 1992;77:343–9. - PubMed
    1. Belforte JE, Barceló AC, Pazo JH. Striatal modulation of the jaw opening reflex. Brain Res. 2001;891:138–47. - PubMed
    1. Bouhassira D, Bing Z, Le Bars D. Studies of the brain structures involved in diffuse noxious inhibitory controls: the mesencephalon. J Neurophysiol. 1990;64:1712–23. - PubMed
    1. Bouhassira D, Bing Z, Le Bars D. Effects of lesions of locus coeruleus/subcoeruleus on diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in the rat. Brain Res. 1992;571:140–4. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms