Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Dec;36(12):1147-1160.
doi: 10.1037/hea0000524. Epub 2017 Aug 21.

Evaluation of coping as a mediator of the relationship between stressful life events and cancer-related distress

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of coping as a mediator of the relationship between stressful life events and cancer-related distress

Dale J Langford et al. Health Psychol. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Lifetime stressful life events (SLEs) may predispose oncology patients to cancer-related distress (i.e., intrusive thoughts, hyperarousal, avoidance). Coping may influence cancer-related distress by mediating this relationship. This study sought to (a) determine the prevalence and impact of lifetime SLEs among oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy and (b) examine the relationship between SLEs and cancer-related distress and the mediating role of coping on this relationship.

Method: Patients (n = 957), with breast, gastrointestinal, gynecologic or lung cancer, who were undergoing chemotherapy, completed the Life Stressor Checklist-Revised (LSC-R), a measure of lifetime SLEs. Cancer-related distress was assessed with the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Coping strategies since beginning chemotherapy were assessed with the Brief COPE; 2 latent variables (engagement and disengagement coping) were identified based on these scores. LSC-R scores (number of SLEs and perceived impact during the prior year) were evaluated in relation to demographic and clinical characteristics. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the relationship between LSC-R and Impact of Event Scale-Revised scores and the mediating role of engagement and disengagement coping on this relationship.

Results: On average, patients reported 6.1 (SD = 4.0; range = 0-23 out of 30) SLEs. Patients who were not married/partnered, had incomes <$30,000/year, or who had lower functional status or greater comorbidity had higher LSC-R scores. The relationship between more SLEs and more severe cancer-related distress was completely mediated by disengagement coping. Engagement coping did not mediate this relationship.

Conclusions: Disengagement coping, including behavioral disengagement, avoidance, and denial, should be targeted to mitigate cancer-related distress. (PsycINFO Database Record

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Structural equation models that estimated direct and indirect (mediating) effects of stressful life events (SLEs) on cancer-related distress via both engagement and disengagement coping
A: Model 1 - Direct effect of life stress (SLEs) and coping on cancer-related distress, *p

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acock AC. Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata (Revised Ed.) College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2013.
    1. Andersen BL. Predicting sexual and psychologic morbidity and improving the quality of life for women with gynecologic cancer. Cancer. 1993;71(4 Suppl):1678–1690. - PubMed
    1. Andersen BL, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R. A biobehavioral model of cancer stress and disease course. The American Psychologist. 1994;49(5):389–404. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrykowski MA, Cordova MJ. Factors associated with PTSD symptoms following treatment for breast cancer: test of the Andersen model. J Trauma Stress. 1998;11(2):189–203. doi: 10.1023/A:1024490718043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barskova T, Oesterreich R. Post-traumatic growth in people living with a serious medical condition and its relations to physical and mental health: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(21):1709–1733. doi: 10.1080/09638280902738441. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types