Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 28;12(9):e0185539.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185539. eCollection 2017.

Population genetics and adaptation to climate along elevation gradients in invasive Solidago canadensis

Affiliations

Population genetics and adaptation to climate along elevation gradients in invasive Solidago canadensis

Emily V Moran et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Gene flow between populations may either support local adaptation by supplying genetic variation on which selection may act, or counteract it if maladapted alleles arrive faster than can be purged by selection. Although both such effects have been documented within plant species' native ranges, how the balance of these forces influences local adaptation in invasive plant populations is less clear, in part because introduced species often have lower genetic variation initially but also tend to have good dispersal abilities. To evaluate the extent of gene flow and adaptation to local climate in invasive populations of Solidago canadensis, and the implications of this for range expansion, we compared population differentiation at microsatellite and chloroplast loci for populations across Switzerland and assessed the effect of environmental transfer distance using common gardens. We found that while patterns of differentiation at neutral genetic markers suggested that populations are connected through extensive pollen and seed movement, common-garden plants nonetheless exhibited modest adaptation to local climate conditions. Growth rate and flower production declined with climatic distance from a plant's home site, with clones from colder home sites performing better at or above the range limit. Such adaptation in invasive species is likely to promote further spread, particularly under climate change, as the genotypes positioned near the range edge may be best able to take advantage of lengthening growing seasons to expand the range.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Map of sampled populations and common garden locations.
Grey dots—populations included in population genetic analyses and common gardens. Black dots—populations included in population genetic analyses only. White dots in square inset—Common gardens.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Photos of common gardens.
(A) Lowest garden, June 25, 2013. Plants just starting to send up shoots. (B) Lowest garden, September 9, 2013. Inflorescences covered with mesh bags to reduce pollination and prevent seed dispersal. (C) Highest garden, August 26, 2013. Notice that none of the plants have inflorescence buds. (D) Middle elevation garden, October 14, 2013. Stems knocked over by first snowfall.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Differentiation measures and estimated ratio of pollen to seed movement versus distance.
(A)Pairwise D for nuclear microsatellite markers versus straight-line distance between populations. (B) Pairwise microsatellite GST versus straight-line distance. (C) Comparison of chloroplast haplotype GST (open circles, thin line), chloroplast haplotype NST (black circles, thick line), and average nuclear microsatellite GST (diamonds, thin line), by 20 m distance class. (D) Estimated ratio of pollen movement (m.pollen) to seed movement (m.seed) by 20 m distance class, based on chloroplast haplotype GST versus average nuclear microsatellite GST. Linear regression results shown—all are statistically significant.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Chloroplast haplotypes.
(A) Haplotype network based on statistical parsimony. Circle size corresponds to the number of genotyped individuals with that particular haplotype, while nodes between circles represent the number of changes separating two haplotypes. (B) Distribution of haplotypes across sampled populations in Switzerland. Each pie chart corresponds to one of the sampled populations.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Performance of plants when planted at 3 common gardens along an elevation transect.
(A) Height growth rate (HGR) versus difference in average degree-days (DD) between planting site and home site in 2013. (B) HGR vs. difference in DD between planting site and home site in 2014. (C) Total inflorescence buds vs. DD difference in 2013. (D) Number of mature inflorescences vs. DD difference in 2014. E & F—Number of mature flowers vs. HGR in 2013 & 2014. Inflorescences matured (flowers senesced) before end of growing season only at lowest site in 2013 and low and middle sites in 2014. Thick colored lines indicate within-site relationships. Thin black lines indicate across-site relationships. Solid lines indicate statistically significant relationships. Dashed lines indicate marginally significant relationship (p
Fig 6
Fig 6. Additional performance measures relative to difference in degree days between planting site and home site.
(A) Julian date at which first inflorescence bud recorded, 2013. (B) Julian date of first inflorescence bud, 2014. (C) Plant height at date of first inflorescence bud, 2013. Stems stop growing once apical meristem transforms. (D) Plant height at date of first flower bud, 2014. (E) Time between first bud formation and first inflorescence maturation, 2013. (F) Time between first bud formation and first maturation, 2014. Thick colored lines indicate within-site relationships. Thin black lines indicate across-site relationships. Solid lines indicate statistically significant relationships. Dashed lines indicate marginally significant relationship (p

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Garant D, Forde SE, Hendry AP. The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation. Funct Ecol. 2007;21: 434–443.
    1. Kawecki TJ. Adaptation to marginal habitats. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2008;39: 321–342.
    1. Räsänen K, Hendry AP. Disentangling interactions between adaptive divergence and gene flow when ecology drives diversification: Adaptive divergence and gene flow. Ecol Lett. 2008;11: 624–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01176.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sexton JP, McIntyre PJ, Angert AL, Rice KJ. Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2009;40: 415–436.
    1. Kirkpatrick M, Barton NH. Evolution of a species’ range. Am Nat. 1997;150: 1–23. doi: 10.1086/286054 - DOI - PubMed