Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;27(7):1865-1876.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1860-1. Epub 2018 Apr 21.

Quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal cancers undergoing chemotherapy

Affiliations

Quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal cancers undergoing chemotherapy

Ilufredo Y Tantoy et al. Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Findings regarding changes in the quality of life (QOL) of patients with gastrointestinal cancers (GI) undergoing chemotherapy (CTX) are inconclusive. Purpose was to evaluate for changes in QOL scores of patients with GI cancers over two cycles of CTX.

Methods: Patients (n = 397) completed disease-specific [i.e., Quality of Life-Scale-Patient Version (QOL-PV)] and generic [12-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Survey (SF-12)] measures of QOL a total of six times over two cycles of CTX. Changes in these QOL scores were evaluated using bootstrapped multilevel regression with full information maximum likelihood estimation. Treatment group (i.e., with or without targeted therapy), age, number of metastatic sites, time from cancer diagnosis, number of prior cancer treatments, GI cancer diagnosis (i.e., colon/rectum/anal vs. other), and CTX regimen were evaluated as covariates in the conditional models for each of the QOL scores.

Results: During the second cycle of CTX, QOL-PV scores decreased in the week following CTX administration, and then increased the following week. For both cycles of CTX, the physical component summary and mental component summary scores of the SF-12 decreased in the week following CTX administration and then increased the following week. Increased time from cancer diagnosis and a higher number of prior cancer treatments resulted in worse QOL-PV and SF-12 scores at enrollment.

Conclusions: While changes in QOL scores over the two CTX cycles were statistically significant, the differences were not clinically meaningful. Future studies need to determine the optimal timing of QOL assessments to assess changes associated with cancer treatments.

Keywords: Chemotherapy; Gastrointestinal cancer; Quality of life; Targeted therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1A Observed (filled circles) and predicted (filled squares) trajectories of QOL-PV scores across the six assessments. Figure 1B Observed (filled circles) and predicted (filled squares) trajectories of PCS scores across the six assessments. Figure 1C Observed (filled circles) and predicted (filled squares) trajectories of MCS scores across the six assessments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bottomley A. The cancer patient and quality of life. The Oncologist. 2002;7:120–125. - PubMed
    1. McCahill LE, Yothers G, Sharif S, Petrelli NJ, Lai LL, Bechar N, et al. Primary mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab without resection of the primary tumor for patients presenting with surgically unresectable metastatic colon cancer and an intact asymptomatic colon cancer: definitive analysis of NSABP trial C-10. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30(26):3223–3228. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, Green E, Orchard K, Wang K, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Annals of Oncology. 2015;26(9):1846–1858. - PubMed
    1. Post MW. Definitions of quality of life: what has happened and how to move on. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury and Rehabilitation. 2014;20(3):167–180. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khanna D, Tsevat J. Health related qualtiy of life: An introduction. American Journal of Managed Care. 2007;13(9):S218–S223. - PubMed