Urinary incontinence severity: the impact on workplace productivity
- PMID: 40646280
- PMCID: PMC12254084
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05822-y
Urinary incontinence severity: the impact on workplace productivity
Abstract
Purpose: Urinary Incontinence (UI) is a highly prevalent yet underreported condition among middle-aged women, with its symptom severity significantly impacting Workplace Productivity (WP). This study aimed to explore the impact of UI symptom severity on the WP of middle-aged women and to investigate the proportion of women who refrain from seeking medical treatment.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 1,214 Portuguese women aged 40-65 (Mage=49.97; SDage=6.737), actively employed and self-reporting occasional/frequent urine loss. All data analyses were done with IBM SPSS Statistics and IBM SPSS AMOS. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to analyze associations while adjusting for confounders such as age, education, menopausal status, BMI, and perceived sleep quality.
Results: The predictive model showed an acceptable fit (CFI = 0.921; TLI = 0.850; RMSEA = 0.076; SRMR = 0.049). Higher UI symptom severity significantly predicted greater WP impairment (β = 0.440; p <.001). Age (β= - 0.107; p =.002) and education (β= - 0.061; p =.020) were associated with a lower impact of UI on WP, while poor sleep quality was associated with greater WP impairment (β = 0.121; p =.006). Notably, 60% of participants experiencing had not contacted a doctor regarding their symptoms, and 72.7% had never undergone treatment for UI.
Conclusion: UI symptom severity negatively impacts WP, yet most affected women do not seek treatment. More effective workplace-based online interventions and accessible UI management strategies are essential to mitigating these effects. Future research should also incorporate objective clinical assessments and explore interventions tailored to different UI subtypes.
Keywords: Help-seeking behavior; Occupational productivity; Symptom burden; Urinary symptoms.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: The studies involving humans were approved by Ispa – Instituto Universitário Ethics Committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training.2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 36508513 Free Books & Documents.
-
Influence of Urinary Incontinence Related Factors on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Jun 12;20:1881-1892. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S515494. eCollection 2025. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025. PMID: 40529223 Free PMC article.
-
Dysfunctional Urinary Incontinence Strategies: A Mediation Model to Explain Why Urinary Incontinence Symptoms Are Associated With Social Isolation Among Women.Neurourol Urodyn. 2025 Aug;44(6):1361-1369. doi: 10.1002/nau.70079. Epub 2025 May 19. Neurourol Urodyn. 2025. PMID: 40384624
-
Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 2;9(9):CD012337. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012337.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36053030 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5. PMID: 33871055 Free PMC article. Updated.
References
-
- Abrams P, Andersson KE, Apostolidis A et al (2018) 6th international consultation on incontinence. Recommendations of the international scientific committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 37(7):2271–2272. 10.1002/nau.23551 - PubMed
-
- Mostafaei H, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Hajebrahimi S et al (2020) Prevalence of female urinary incontinence in the developing world: A systematic review and meta‐analysis—a report from the developing world committee of the international continence society and Iranian research center for evidence based medicine. Neurourol Urodyn 39(4):1063–1086. 10.1002/nau.24342 - PubMed
-
- Xu D, Wang X, Li J, Wang K (2014) The mediating effect of bothersome urinary incontinence on help-seeking intentions among community-dwelling women. J Adv Nurs 71(2):315–325. 10.1111/jan.12514 - PubMed
-
- Seshan V, AlKhasawneh E, Hashmi IHA (2016) Risk factors of urinary incontinence in women: a literature review. Int J Urol Nurs 10(3):118–126. 10.1111/ijun.12107
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous