Jump to content

Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To report an error in content currently or imminently to appear on Main Page, use the appropriate section below. Reports should contain:

  • Where is the error? An exact quotation using {{!xt}} of the text in question helps.
  • Offer a correction if possible using {{xt}}.
  • References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
  • Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 13:07 on 1 August 2025) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
  • Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
  • Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems because this is not a talk page. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
  • No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
  • Actual errors only. Failures of subjective criteria such as interestingness are not errors.
  • Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
  • Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Errors in the summary of the featured article

[edit]
Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Errors with "In the news"

[edit]

Errors in "Did you know ..."

[edit]

... that Hannah Sharts played soccer for the UCLA Bruins over twenty years after her mother fought to create the team? This seems to be completely wrong. The team had existed for a long time already, what Sharts' mother fought for was to make it a Division I team. Fram (talk) 10:09, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the source says "Michele transferred to UCLA and joined the school's club program ... But Michele and her UCLA teammates wanted more. They wanted to play at the highest collegiate level."[1] Even their club sport team is referred to as the Bruins.[2] Perhaps reword to something like "... fought to create the NCAA team". The article needs updating too. —Bagumba (talk) 10:42, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging DYK folks: @24Anonymous, DaniloDaysOfOurLives, JuniperChill, and Ganesha811. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:52, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm terribly sorry, I'm a bit new to the college soccer sphere and I'm afraid I misinterpreted the articles. I do like the "... fought to create the NCAA team" correction posed by @Bagumba. I will re-read the sources and update the page accordingly too. 24Anonymous (talk) 14:45, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Added "NCAA".—Bagumba (talk) 06:08, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have a source that states that the team wasn't NCAA (but lower divisions) before this? It's not clear to me whether wanting to be a Division I team means that they weren't NCAA at all. Fram (talk) 08:19, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This one used in the article looks to cover it. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:18, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in "On this day"

[edit]
[edit]
(August 1, today)
(August 4)
[edit]

There's a grammar problem.

"It grows with square stems to 5 to 20 centimetres (2 to 8 inches) in height"

should probably be either

"It grows with square stems from 5 to 20 centimetres (2 to 8 inches) in height"

or simply

"It grows with square stems 5 to 20 centimetres (2 to 8 inches) in height"

ShoneBrooks (talk) 04:21, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But ShoneBrooks, if what's meant is that after the process of growth, its height ranges from 5 to 20 cm, then it's OK as is. And indeed the article Lamium purpureum tells us that it "grows with square stems to 5–20 centimetres (2–8 in), rarely 40 cm, in height". I'll agree that what's proposed can be misread; so how about something like "With square stems, it reaches 5 to 20 centimetres (2 to 8 inches) in height"? -- Hoary (talk) [an interloper in both main page and in botanical matters] 06:53, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I read the meaning in the same way as Hoary -- some teachers/style guides would advocate for commas around the adverbial phrase (It grows, with square stems, to 5 to 20 centimetres...). However, as we have to 50 to 20 centimetres, there's no ambiguity, so others, particularly in the UK, would avoid the commas (as it's doing the same job as e.g. it grows quickly to 50 to 20 centimetres). A separate tweak might be to go for to between 5 and 20 centimetres, which would avoid the repetition of "to" and perhaps make it more obvious that the first "to" isn't a mistake. UndercoverClassicist T·C 09:15, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, with the additional insight, either option makes sense; "It grows with square stems between 5 to 20 (2 to 8 inches) in height," or "With square stems, it reaches 5 to 20 centimetres (2 to 8 inches) in height." Both seem fine. A simpler construct might be, "Its square stems grow to a height of 5 to 20 centimetres (2 to 8 inches)." -ShoneBrooks (talk) 13:07, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Any other Main Page errors

[edit]

Please report any such problems or suggestions for improvement at the General discussion section of Talk:Main Page.