IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v93y2025ics0957178725000050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of distribution locational marginal pricing and cost-sharing pricing mechanisms on fairness, efficiency, and voltage quality in transactive energy systems

Author

Listed:
  • Galeano-Suárez, Daniel
  • Toquica, David
  • Henao, Nilson
  • Agbossou, Kodjo
  • Oviedo-Cepeda, JC

Abstract

The increasing integration of distributed energy resources and the evolution of smart grids pave the way to Transactive Energy Systems (TES). Numerous initiatives have been made to craft pricing mechanisms on TES as incentives to leverage resource flexibility and contribute to improving technical and economic indexes. Nevertheless, comparing these pricing mechanisms is challenging due to the fluctuating market conditions and diverse TES configurations. This research compares the impact of the Distribution Locational Marginal Pricing (DLMP) and Cost-Sharing (CS) pricing mechanisms on TES fairness, economic efficiency, and voltage quality under identical market conditions. In addition, a unified index is proposed to compile market metrics and facilitate Distribution System Operator (DSO) decisions on pricing according to weighted objectives. Accordingly, this research contributes valuable insights that promote TES expansion and better management for DSOs and market regulators. This paper uses a transactive forward market on the IEEE-33 bus test system as a case study. The results show that CS pricing yields complete price fairness. In contrast, the DLMP forgo fairness for the sake of economic efficiency. Here, the unified index reveals that CS pricing is preferable when the DSO weights equally fairness and efficiency, even though DLMP demonstrates a superior voltage quality index in the case study. The developed comparison framework is general to all pricing mechanisms as it simplifies the interactions between the DSO and the consumers through price and energy demand signals.

Suggested Citation

  • Galeano-Suárez, Daniel & Toquica, David & Henao, Nilson & Agbossou, Kodjo & Oviedo-Cepeda, JC, 2025. "Impact of distribution locational marginal pricing and cost-sharing pricing mechanisms on fairness, efficiency, and voltage quality in transactive energy systems," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:93:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725000050
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.101890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000050
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.101890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    --->

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sprumont, Yves, 1998. "Ordinal Cost Sharing," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 126-162, July.
    2. Pierre Dehez & Daniela Tellone, 2013. "Data Games: Sharing Public Goods with Exclusion," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 15(4), pages 654-673, August.
    3. Dynge, Marthe Fogstad & Berg, Kjersti & Bjarghov, Sigurd & Cali, Ümit, 2023. "Local electricity market pricing mechanisms’ impact on welfare distribution, privacy and transparency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    4. Sinsel, Simon R. & Riemke, Rhea L. & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2020. "Challenges and solution technologies for the integration of variable renewable energy sources—a review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 2271-2285.
    5. Daniel Kahneman & Alan B. Krueger, 2006. "Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(1), pages 3-24, Winter.
    6. Konow, James, 1996. "A positive theory of economic fairness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 13-35, October.
    7. Peter Cramton, 2017. "Electricity market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 589-612.
    8. Hahnel, Ulf J.J. & Herberz, Mario & Pena-Bello, Alejandro & Parra, David & Brosch, Tobias, 2020. "Becoming prosumer: Revealing trading preferences and decision-making strategies in peer-to-peer energy communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Dheeraj Sharma & Shaheen Borna & James Stearns, 2009. "An Investigation of the Effects of Corporate Ethical Values on Employee Commitment and Performance: Examining the Moderating Role of Perceived Fairness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 251-260, October.
    10. Cherrelle Eid & Paul Codani & Yannick Perez & Javier Reneses & Rudi Hakvoort, 2016. "Managing electric flexibility from Distributed Energy Resources: A review of incentives for market design," Post-Print hal-01792419, HAL.
    11. Eid, Cherrelle & Codani, Paul & Perez, Yannick & Reneses, Javier & Hakvoort, Rudi, 2016. "Managing electric flexibility from Distributed Energy Resources: A review of incentives for market design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 237-247.
    12. Rita, Rui & Marques, Vitor & Bárbara, Diogo & Chaves, Inês & Macedo, Pedro & Moutinho, Victor & Pereira, Mariana, 2023. "Crossing non-parametric and parametric techniques for measuring the efficiency: Evidence from 65 European electricity Distribution System Operators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mashlakov, Aleksei & Pournaras, Evangelos & Nardelli, Pedro H.J. & Honkapuro, Samuli, 2021. "Decentralized cooperative scheduling of prosumer flexibility under forecast uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    2. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Abram, Simone & Geach, Dale & Jenkins, David & McCallum, Peter & Peacock, Andrew, 2019. "Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 143-174.
    4. Rancilio, G. & Rossi, A. & Falabretti, D. & Galliani, A. & Merlo, M., 2022. "Ancillary services markets in europe: Evolution and regulatory trade-offs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Cherrelle Eid & Rudi Hakvoort & Martin de Jong, 2016. "Global trends in the political economy of smart grids: A tailored perspective on 'smart' for grids in transition," WIDER Working Paper Series 022, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Konstantinos Kotsalos & Ismael Miranda & Nuno Silva & Helder Leite, 2019. "A Horizon Optimization Control Framework for the Coordinated Operation of Multiple Distributed Energy Resources in Low Voltage Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, March.
    7. Pearson, Simon & Wellnitz, Sonja & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Hashemipour, Naser, 2022. "The value of TSO-DSO coordination in re-dispatch with flexible decentralized energy sources: Insights for Germany in 2030," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    8. Ajla Mehinovic & Matej Zajc & Nermin Suljanovic, 2023. "Interpretation and Quantification of the Flexibility Sources Location on the Flexibility Service in the Distribution Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Pol Olivella-Rosell & Pau Lloret-Gallego & Íngrid Munné-Collado & Roberto Villafafila-Robles & Andreas Sumper & Stig Ødegaard Ottessen & Jayaprakash Rajasekharan & Bernt A. Bremdal, 2018. "Local Flexibility Market Design for Aggregators Providing Multiple Flexibility Services at Distribution Network Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Patrick Sunday Onen & Geev Mokryani & Rana H. A. Zubo, 2022. "Planning of Multi-Vector Energy Systems with High Penetration of Renewable Energy Source: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Joao C. Ferreira & Ana Lucia Martins, 2018. "Building a Community of Users for Open Market Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Kaiss, Mateus & Wan, Yihao & Gebbran, Daniel & Vila, Clodomiro Unsihuay & Dragičević, Tomislav, 2025. "Review on Virtual Power Plants/Virtual Aggregators: Concepts, applications, prospects and operation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    13. Zubi, Ghassan & Kuhn, Maximilian & Makridis, Sofoklis & Coutinho, Savio & Dorasamy, Stanley, 2025. "Aviation sector decarbonization within the hydrogen economy – A UAE case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    14. Haas, Christian & Kempa, Karol & Moslener, Ulf, 2023. "Dealing with deep uncertainty in the energy transition: What we can learn from the electricity and transportation sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    15. Jianfei Shen & Fengyun Li & Di Shi & Hongze Li & Xinhua Yu, 2018. "Factors Affecting the Economics of Distributed Natural Gas-Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Systems in China: A Systematic Analysis Based on the Integrated Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Labo," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, September.
    16. Danica Djurić Ilić, 2020. "Classification of Measures for Dealing with District Heating Load Variations—A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-27, December.
    17. Finck, Christian & Li, Rongling & Zeiler, Wim, 2020. "Optimal control of demand flexibility under real-time pricing for heating systems in buildings: A real-life demonstration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    18. Freitas Gomes, Icaro Silvestre & Perez, Yannick & Suomalainen, Emilia, 2020. "Coupling small batteries and PV generation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    19. Mays, Jacob, 2021. "Missing incentives for flexibility in wholesale electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    20. Abdullah M. Alabdullatif & Enrico H. Gerding & Alvaro Perez-Diaz, 2020. "Market Design and Trading Strategies for Community Energy Markets with Storage and Renewable Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-31, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:93:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725000050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.