Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- Sarshaar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1233 five times in the last 5 minutes (Long string of characters with no punctuation or markup, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:51, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- 103.168.33.163 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:51, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:36, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Marouf ahmadzai (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:42, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Sonia jhammat 08 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Lower Manhattan was changed by Sonia jhammat 08 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95033 on 2025-07-27T07:50:40+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 07:50, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- 178.223.61.72 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1362 (LTA 1362, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:08, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- 220.240.255.142 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:06, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- 2404:1c40:57:f198:78bb:f2ff:fe45:cff4 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:14, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Dongwa2001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – block evasion by 2601:644:8500:CE76:ED66:1957:ECF8:BF0 and Son of Zorn. Untamed1910 (talk) 00:25, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- 42.73.99.72 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Phạm Cự Lạng: Block evasion. Annh07 (talk) 00:36, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- 2603:7080:8D00:ED6:854E:D80C:4955:4C2B (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning - Repeatedly disruptive editing, as well as a personal attack. Mad Jim Bey talk 00:41, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- CaddoParishisLouisianaLittleRock (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Tax my gyatt (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "gyatt" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Moshishito2999 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "shit" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Please note that many names contain the string "shit" especially names from India - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy., maybe we could recalibrate this filter to not fire on the string shishito? signed, Rosguill talk 21:34, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- TestUhKguyGIoPjHIIPhkOHpUuPpiijhIOgig789OLJhkhLH (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- The Hooded Renegades (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional and disruptive username. Hoax creator please see editing in userspace at User:The Hooded Renegades. Nayyn (talk) 10:06, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Biggest hater of makakini bananini (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. MathXplore (talk) 14:45, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- It's a meme apparently. Secretlondon (talk) 20:01, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Dtechbd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Annh07 (talk) 19:49, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Pixelfreunde (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See users edits in deleted article User:Pixelfreunde/sandbox. Jumpytoo Talk 21:59, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- It looks like it's one guy and his unique world changing theory. It can stay deleted of course, but I don't think it's promo, unless I've missed something. Secretlondon (talk) 22:16, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper constantly removing valid sources. 1 week semi would be enough to get the message across. 5 different IPs by now, all stripping the source of a connection and claiming that it is year round (unsourced) instead of seasonal (sourced). The Banner talk 13:18, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Question: @The Banner: Which source in the article states that the Ottawa-Victoria route is seasonal? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- The source that was removed was this one. The current source - google booking machine - also fails to prove that the connection is year round. The Banner talk 00:54, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: (See WP:TALKNO, WP:SOAPBOX). Referral from WP:BLPN. Trolling by IPs posing sarcastic and distracting comments at length that have no productive value. These are meant to interfere with the ongoing RfC on the same talkpage, where identical or similar comments were posted and failed to gain a swell of reaction. See 1, 2 & 3. These were created as new sections after the same trolling was mostly ignored at the ongoing RfC further up the talkpage. In response to removal, anon IP posts on usertalks to troll further, feigning cluelessness (4, 5) or making outright WP:PAs (6, 7, 8). JFHJr (㊟) 18:34, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 107.222.64.119 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the page for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 22:22, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Skitash (talk) 21:31, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Both recent socks indeffed by Lofty abyss. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism always resumed after multiple protection attempts, please try indef RaschenTechner (talk) 22:07, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last vandalism was 12 days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 22:24, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch™ 22:51, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent unsourced edits by IPs on this BLP, reverting of issue tags, refusal to engage with questions on talk page creating a lot of work for editors to revert changes. Nayyn (talk) 22:59, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism, unsourced content additions and other nonconstructive edits still coming after three months of PC expired, though there have been a few positive IP contributions since then. Entranced98 (talk) 00:49, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:29, 21 July 2025 (UTC) |
| 7 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:23, 28 July 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
I have been on Wikipedia for more than a decade, and I truly feel that it is one of my great passions in life. I have more than 30,000 edits, and I am credited with more than 300 articles that are not Redirects or Disambiguation pages. (I personally take credit for more than 100 of these, which did not originate as Redirect pages.) Although I continue to propose Draft pages to this day when I am not 100% confident myself about notability, I frequently go straight to the mainspace and have made a number of articles that have been significant in some form or field, with my particular focus being on film industry and electoral politics pages. Recently, I redirected a few thousand Supreme Court of the United States cases to the case volumes in which they were listed. It was a large-scale project for me, but in the end it was decided that redlinks would be better for promoting caseload knowledge, something that I agreed to and I believe will continue to service our Wikipedia community. For this reason, it might appear that I have a large number of deleted pages, but this is almost exclusively due to this particular project; I had an edit deletion rate of less than 2%, and I had not had a page that I created taken down in years, not since I was a far more novice editor. (You can read more about that SCOTUS discussion here.) I believe that being autopatrolled will continue to allow me to contribute to the Wikipedia community, and that is why I am reaching out to ask for permissions. I am happy to answer any questions or improve any articles that I have created if there is anything noticeable that needs help. Although I have long been looking to increase my permissions and role in the community, I quite frankly have always had impostor syndrome stop me from asking, but a bit of encouragement from Liz made me try. Thank you so much! PickleG13 (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
I have created over 25 new articles that meet notability guidelines and follow Wikipedia standards and guideliness. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s core content policies (NPOV, V, NOR) and believe that being autopatrolled will reduce the workload on new page patrollers, my ittention for contributing to Wikipedia, i have mention to my talk page, also to be noted i am reviewer and patroller at Albanian wiki with all articles, neither deleted, and noone of edits are reverted. Thank you in advance. Lanceloth345 (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Been an active user for a few years, created 25+ articles with the only two deletions being mistakenly created redirects (due to a script error). Multiple GAs and FLs. I understand enwiki notability guidelines thoroughly.ULPS (talk • contribs) 22:51, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
As part of the Women in Red project, I create pages about women by translating, adapting, and improving articles from the Spanish Wikipedia. Onatic (talk) 21:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Slightly below the recommended 25 creations before nomination, but this editor has a track record of writing quality content that I don't believe NPP needs to continue reviewing. No issues found spot-checking their recent creations. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:26, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Demonstrates understanding of the notability guidelines on a variety of subjects. The articles are fairly well-written and -formatted; a few are also now GAs. I marked a couple of her newer creations as reviewed and found no major issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:31, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
I have created more than 25 non redirect articles within the past few weeks and 53 non redirects overall. The two mainspace ones that have been deleted were by my own request, thanks to a slip of the "Publish changes" button. Aside from those, all have been approved by the adminteam. I would greatly be thankful to receive this permission. Luxtaythe2nd (Talk to me...) 17:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I have create multiple articles which are rated well and want to tool to simplify editing and maintaining them and other articles. Dahawk04 Talk 💬 16:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Request AWB permissions to assist with cleanup across Wikiprojects I participate in, including Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies and Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand, especially in cases where New Zealand English is used inconsistently on articles about New Zealand. Nixleovel (He/They) (Talk • Contribs) 01:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to use AutoWikiBrowser for adding Rcat templates to multiple pages at once, as part of WikiProject Redirect. Spiral6800 (talk) 09:10, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I am interested in helping to eliminate the backlog, particularly for articles involving Chinese, Japanese, or Korean-language sources—languages I am familiar with—that often remain stuck for long periods due to language barriers. I have experience at AFD and AFC, and while the P&G vary across Wikiprojects, I have served as an NPP on zhwiki for four years. —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 08:57, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting this flag to help patrol new articles and drafts. My main focus would be reviewing quality content based on English Wikipedia and marking CSD promotional/advertisement/spam content. Also, identify copyright violations if any when discovered. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 09:07, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm reapplying for NPR rights as my three-month trial is about to expire. I unfortunately haven't done that much patrolling during my trial as I've mostly been working in other areas, but hopefully my AfC, CSD, AfD and article creation records are enough to show that I have a sufficient understanding of policies and guidelines to be trusted with this right. If approved, I'm definitely hoping to be more active at NPP in the future to help clear the backlog. MCE89 (talk) 02:33, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I’m re-applying for NPP permission after a three-month trial. I haven’t been a super prolific reviewer (90 articles + 38 redirects) but I’ve also done more content creation, de-stubbing, and AfD which I hope also helps demonstrate my understanding of the key principles. I’ve found NPP quite rewarding and would love to continue working. Zzz plant (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Greetings, I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for the past one year, during which I have created and edited serval articles in line with Wikipedia’s content policies and guidelines. I was previously granted New Page Reviewer permissions on a temporary basis but was unable to make full use of the tools at that time, due to other commitments. I am now available to contribute to the project, particularly in helping to reduce the backlog of unreviewed articles, Thank you for considering my request. (Primefac) 2RDD (talk) 11:30, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting for this permission to help address the backlog of unreviewed pages and to ensure the quality of new content submitted uses encyclopedic language and that the content is accurate and neutral. I have participated in hundreds of AfDs and during that time I have developed a solid understanding of WP:GNG, RS requirements (WP:SIGCOV), and other relevant policies for reviewing pages. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:23, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
I received notification that my NPP rights will expire on July 26, 2025. If you believe I have performed satisfactorily during my NPP probationary period. Please renew my position as an NPP reviewer. Thank you. Bakhtar40 (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I am applying to renew my patroller user right after a notification on my talk page. I'm not sure what I am supposed to write here, but feel free to ask me questions 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request New Page Reviewer rights to support efforts in curating new content and reducing the existing backlog. Over the course of my contributions, I’ve developed a strong understanding of key content policies, including WP:N, WP:RS, and WP:BLP, and I’ve actively participated in AfD discussions and improved multiple articles. My goal is to ensure that newly created pages meet Wikipedia's standards for neutrality, sourcing, and notability. As an AfD participant, I’ve gained experience in identifying promotional or non-notable content and would like to expand my activity towards this area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Lorraine Crane (talk) 04:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
I was granted patroller rights on 30 April for the May backlog drive. I would like either an extension or permanent rights as I have continued reviewing at both NPP and AfC. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 06:04, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
I specialize in reviewing articles with Kannada, English and Hindi-language sources, which often face prolonged backlogs due to limited reviewer availability. My fluency in these languages enables me to: • Verify sources that others might skip due to language barriers • Improve coverage of South Asian topics • Guide new editors working with regional references Having participated extensively in AFD and AFC processes, I understand enwiki's notability standards. I'm particularly motivated to clear the bottleneck for Indic-language articles that deserve timely review. Editorrking (talk) 13:15, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm interested in helping reduce the backlog, especially for articles under Wikipedia Tambayan, with a focus on topics in the Music Task Force. Some pages tend to sit unreviewed for quite a while, based on what i've seen, and it would be great to help move them along. There's also I have experience in AfD discussions, particularly when it comes to looking into suspicious or possibly non-notable articles. Thank you! AdobongPogi masarap 🍛 09:45, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
I've been involved in WP for a long time now, with a very clean record. I've used AWB and other tools previously, and also previously patrolled new pages. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 00:38, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
Mainly requesting so I can bold move pages to multi-revision redirects, but I may cautiously move into closing RMs one day. I think I have decent experience from participating at WP:RMC and understand the guidelines reasonably well. Thanks, Kowal2701 (talk) 10:58, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
This right would be helpful for when I close RMs so that I don't need to request the move be performed at WP:RM/TR afterwards, as well as potentially helping out with moves there myself. Tenshi! (Talk page) 23:15, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Requesting access to assist with the backlog in helping to ensure pending edits meet the criteria of the Wikipedia policies & guidelines. Eulersidentity (talk) 10:13, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting for the pending changes reviewer rights to help review pending changes. Allblessed (talk) 08:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Desire to possess the ability to approve or reject protected article edits, having reviewed and become familiar with Wikipedia copyright and vandalism rules and guidelines; and having demonstrated a responsible record of stewardship of articles and related media over the course of this account. Thank you for your consideration and any feedback on additional qualifying criteria. OceanLoop (talk) 00:06, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting the pending changes reviewer right because I would like to ensure that articles with pending changes are regularly reviewed. I have substantial experience with reviewing recent changes and administrative processes regarding vandalism and page protection and am an active editor. Thanks! Cyrobyte (talk) 01:37, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting for pending changes reviewer rights. because I would ensure that articles with pending changes protection which is vandalized or unexplained changes. Absolutiva 23:12, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
I often patrol the recent changes page and would like to help out more by reviewing changes. I am relatively new to Wikipedia compared to others; however, I have edited many times over the years before I made this account. I have also long been a fan of Wikipedia and would like to help out further. I believe I fit the criteria to get this permission. Otherwise, I understand and would appreciate feedback. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 04:47, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Hello, I need the rollback rights to help revert vandalism and bad faith edits. Allblessed (talk) 08:21, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Fighting against vandalism in my part time. Ḅ̵̼̝̭͔͆̿́͌̚l̷͖̯͚͕̭̑͑̀͑͘a̵͍̘̥̟̪͗̈́̈́͒͠â̷̮͎̲̪̥̿̐͗͝d̵̰͓̠̘̫͒̎̽͊̉a̷̛̬̜̲̲͙̅͛͝͠ (talk) 20:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
I have been reverting and warning vandals for a while now. As evidence for that you can see I have created ~220 user talk pages. I would find rollback particularly useful for persistent/spammy vandals. Thank you. Sophocrat (talk) 21:40, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
As a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wildfire, I frequently patrol pages about wildfires, and undo vandalism. I frequently check Special:RecentChanges for vandalism. I have been active on Wikipedia for more the two years and have made plenty of reverts. I have made 283 edits in the past 6 days alone. CostalCal (talk) 09:30, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to get rollback rights to fight vandalism more effectively. While I don't patrol recent pages often, I do patrol new pages and short pages, where I frequently undo obvious vandalism (as seen in [3]). I'd like rollback to more easily undo edits, as well as access huggle and other tools. Yelps ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ critique me 08:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I want to receive a rollback right because there are a lot of editors who add informations but not citing sources. Usually, they do not add unsourced informations at once, but they add them by multiple times. There are also edits violating MoS or Wikipedia policies. And I have struggled with reverting all of them one by one, so I decided to request a right for rollback. Thank you. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 03:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |