User talk:Novaclia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niddodi has been accepted

Niddodi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

sksatsuma 20:18, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Badagumijaru (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaBetaGamma were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Badagumijaru and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 07:51, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Novaclia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 07:51, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Badagumijaru (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Badagumijaru and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 10:18, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iruvail has been accepted

Iruvail, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 10:42, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Badagumijaru has been accepted

Badagumijaru, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 11:01, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vishvaraj Jadeja (speed skater) has been accepted

Vishvaraj Jadeja (speed skater), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 20:01, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks Duke of Rivi! Novaclia (talk) 03:40, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akash Aradhya (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tenshi Hinanawi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akash Aradhya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tenshi! (Talk page) 14:46, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swarali Deo (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tenshi Hinanawi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Swarali Deo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tenshi! (Talk page) 15:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Abdu Ali Abdul Rahman

Hi there, and thank you for all your help making Wikipedia better! I wanted to let you know that I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of Abdu Ali Abdul Rahman because "notability" is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. However, if you do not believe the subject is notable, you may submit it for deletion via Articles for Deletion. Thanks for your diligence in maintaining Wikipedia's content standards! Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Done, Thanks for guiding me Novaclia 🌀 Novaclia (talk) 19:38, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Always cite reliable sources

Hello, I'm Worldbruce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, A.K.Mohammed Ali Sikder, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 20:58, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Santy Sharma

If you've already tagged it for possible COI, then it will be looked into by the editors who work on investigating possible COIs. Since I'm not one of those, however, there's no particular point in trying to bring it to my personal attention, since I'm not involved in that and don't have the necessary expertise. You don't need to waste your time going around looking for editors to bring it up to, since the tag has already placed it in the COI queue where it will already get dealt with by the editors who deal with those things. Bearcat (talk) 13:22, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification, Bearcat. I understand now that the

tag is sufficient to bring it to the attention of the relevant editors, and I appreciate you pointing that out. I’ll refrain from notifying individual editors further. Just wanted to ensure this potential COI case was properly flagged.

Best regards, Novaclia (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Hello Novaclia. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Novaclia. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Novaclia|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 17:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Just to clarify , I’m not involved in any kind of paid editing on Wikipedia. I came across the Santy Sharma article while reading a OneIndia news piece that was used as a reference there. It caught my attention because it felt promotional, and I noticed he runs his own marketing agency, which raised some red flags for me

Based on that, I tagged the article for deletion because I genuinely thought it might fall under undisclosed paid content

not because I’m affiliated in any way. I have no connection to the subject or anyone involved, and if you check my edit history, I haven’t done anything that would suggest otherwise.

I understand how important COI and transparency are here, and I just wanted to clear that up. Let me know if you need anything else from my side.Novaclia 🌀 Novaclia (talk) 17:26, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

I have nominated this page for deletion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santy Sharma Novaclia (talk) 17:27, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Rahat Kazmi (Pakistani actor). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Jalen Barks (Woof) 21:58, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otwala has been accepted

Otwala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

sksatsuma 23:31, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Remona Evette Pereira (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Remona Evette Pereira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 12:08, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank You , but i didn't complete it yet. Even I didn't send it for review too! Novaclia (talk) 12:10, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

That's weird, maybe you clicked the submit button by mistake or something? Anyway, I made a few edits to your article to improve its neutrality. In the future, there's a "Move" button in the toolbar that you should use when moving/renaming pages, instead of cutting and pasting the page text. Thanks.

Longer explanation

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Remona Evette Pereira a different title by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Remona Evette Pereira. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history. In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. |} —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:16, 29 July 2025 (UTC) Blocked as a sockpuppet Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Btw Santhosh per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Btw Santhosh. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private. Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Izno (talk) 00:32, 30 July 2025 (UTC)