[CALCITE-3677] Add assertion to EnumerableTableScan constructor to validate if the table is suitable for enumerable scan #1721
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vlsi
force-pushed
the
table_torel
branch
11 times, most recently
from
2de4fbf to
b297274
Compare
vlsi
changed the title
…lidate if the table is suitable for enumerable scan This is a workaround for CALCITE-3673. TransientTable can only be implemented with interpreter, so EnumerableTableScan should not be created for those tables.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a workaround for CALCITE-3673.
TransientTable can only be implemented with interpreter,
so EnumerableTableScan should not be created for those tables.