Skip to content

[CALCITE-2629] Remove call to CatalogReader#getAllSchemaObjects #888

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

laurentgo
Copy link
Contributor

CatalogScope constructor makes a call to CatalogReader#getAllSchemaObjects
and stores its result into a private field which is not used by the
class itself, nor has some accessor other class could use.

Removing this call as it might be expensive on some systems.

CatalogScope constructor makes a call to CatalogReader#getAllSchemaObjects
and stores its result into a private field which is not used by the
class itself, nor has some accessor other class could use.

Removing this call as it might be expensive on some systems.
@vlsi
Copy link
Contributor

vlsi commented Oct 24, 2018

@laurentgo , would you please commit it?

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 8cc6df2 Jan 8, 2019
@vlsi vlsi changed the title [CACITE-2629] Remove call to CatalogReader#getAllSchemaObjects [CALCITE-2629] Remove call to CatalogReader#getAllSchemaObjects Jan 8, 2019
ashlanderr pushed a commit to ashlanderr/calcite that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2019
CatalogScope constructor makes a call to CatalogReader#getAllSchemaObjects
and stores its result into a private field which is not used by the
class itself, nor has some accessor other class could use.

Removing this call as it might be expensive on some systems.

fixes apache#888
wangxlong pushed a commit to wangxlong/calcite that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2020
CatalogScope constructor makes a call to CatalogReader#getAllSchemaObjects
and stores its result into a private field which is not used by the
class itself, nor has some accessor other class could use.

Removing this call as it might be expensive on some systems.

fixes apache#888
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants