-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.7k
[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in IValue #48824
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b48bbb4
[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in IValue
swolchok 0198db9
reduce code duplication on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in IValue"
swolchok cff661b
remove unnecessary std::move on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in…
swolchok 805c989
Update on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in IValue"
swolchok cd3ce5f
Update on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in IValue"
swolchok bda623d
Remove Elvis operator. Fix ASAN violation. on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor…
swolchok 1b6544b
Update on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in IValue"
swolchok d774458
rebase, add a few more tests on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in…
swolchok 48211e9
more UB removal on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in IValue"
swolchok bad7e5e
fix isAliasOf and isPtrType on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in …
swolchok fd28d3f
Update on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in IValue"
swolchok 56a6608
Update on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in IValue"
swolchok 3b45f26
Update on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in IValue"
swolchok File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
reduce code duplication on "[PyTorch] Store Tensor explicitly in IValue"
Enables following diff, which will make toTensor() return `const Tensor&` and allow callers to avoid refcounting overhead. Differential Revision: [D25324617](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D25324617/) [ghstack-poisoned]
- Loading branch information
commit 0198db96571fd7c2e8165efb96aa9505e221dbb6
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
You are viewing a condensed version of this merge commit. You can view the full changes here.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ugh this is more involved than I had hoped. I guess it's UB to just relocate the Tensor without destructing and constructing again?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC, you have to construct it in rhs.payload using placement new or it's UB. Skiping the destructor call is legit, and I'll probably try that.