IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfinan/v80y2025i4p2303-2354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating Controversy in Proxy Voting Advice

Author

Listed:
  • ANDREY MALENKO
  • NADYA MALENKO
  • CHESTER SPATT

Abstract

We analyze how a profit‐maximizing proxy advisor designs vote recommendations and research reports. The advisor benefits from producing informative, unbiased reports, but only partially informative recommendations, biased against the a priori likely alternative. Such recommendations induce close votes, increasing controversy and thereby the relevance and value of proxy advice. Our results suggest shifting from an exclusive emphasis on recommendations, highlighting the importance of both reports and recommendations in proxy advisors' information provision. They rationalize the one‐size‐fits‐all approach and help reinterpret empirical patterns of voting behavior, suggesting that proxy advisors' recommendations may not be a suitable benchmark for evaluating shareholders' votes.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey Malenko & Nadya Malenko & Chester Spatt, 2025. "Creating Controversy in Proxy Voting Advice," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 80(4), pages 2303-2354, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:80:y:2025:i:4:p:2303-2354
    DOI: 10.1111/jofi.13438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13438
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jofi.13438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    --->

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:80:y:2025:i:4:p:2303-2354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.