IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v192y2025ics0965856424004051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal parking allocation for heterogeneous vehicle types

Author

Listed:
  • Ismael, Abdelrahman
  • Holguín-Veras, José

Abstract

Parking problems have been inflicting significant negative impacts on the economy. Drivers, in the United States, pay a staggering amount of almost $96 billion annually for parking-related issues, with cruising for parking being the most expensive component at around $73 billion. Additionally, businesses suffer major losses due to limited parking availability, with 39% of U.S. drivers avoiding shopping destinations and 29% avoiding sports and leisure activities because of parking limitations. These issues are primarily caused by a lack of information about parking occupancy and limited parking supply. This lack of information results in drivers cruising for parking, which accounts for 30 % of traffic in some cities. To address these problems, this research proposes an optimization model that allocates arriving individual vehicles with heterogeneous characteristics to specific on-street or off-street parking spaces. The model seeks to reach a system optimal solution by reducing private costs, congestion, emissions, and mitigating cruising. The model utilizes inputs such as vehicle and driver attributes, parking duration, and value of time (VOT) along with information about the network and current parking occupancy to optimize the allocation decisions. This model can be incorporated into a system maintained by cities to assign parking within smart cities and to optimally divide curbside parking by vehicle type and time of day. The results show that vehicles with higher VOTs should be closer to their destination compared with relatively lower VOT vehicles. The results of the model also show that parking systems do not break once demand exceeds supply, rather the critical state of the system is controlled by multiple factors, e.g., demand, vehicle types, parking duration. Hence, the model can provide useful insights by studying scenarios of parking systems breakdown which can be targeted through policy interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ismael, Abdelrahman & Holguín-Veras, José, 2025. "Optimal parking allocation for heterogeneous vehicle types," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0965856424004051
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424004051
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    --->

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnott, Richard & Inci, Eren & Rowse, John, 2015. "Downtown curbside parking capacity," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 83-97.
    2. Arnott, Richard & Inci, Eren, 2006. "An integrated model of downtown parking and traffic congestion," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 418-442, November.
    3. Park, Hyeongjun & Park, Dongjoo & Jeong, In-Jae, 2016. "An effects analysis of logistics collaboration in last-mile networks for CEP delivery services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-125.
    4. Shoup, Donald C., 2006. "Cruising for Parking," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt55s7079f, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Ramirez-Rios, Diana G. & Kalahasthi, Lokesh Kumar & Holguín-Veras, José, 2023. "On-street parking for freight, services, and e-commerce traffic in US cities: A simulation model incorporating demand and duration," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Marko Mladenović & Thierry Delot & Gilbert Laporte & Christophe Wilbaut, 2020. "The parking allocation problem for connected vehicles," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 377-399, June.
    7. Dalla Chiara, Giacomo & Goodchild, Anne, 2020. "Do commercial vehicles cruise for parking? Empirical evidence from Seattle," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 26-36.
    8. Arnott, Richard & Rowse, John, 2009. "Downtown parking in auto city," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Inci, Eren & Lindsey, Robin, 2015. "Garage and curbside parking competition with search congestion," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 49-59.
    10. Amer, Ahmed & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2017. "A downtown on-street parking model with urban truck delivery behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 51-67.
    11. Nilesh Anand & Ron van Duin & Hans Quak & Lori Tavasszy, 2015. "Relevance of City Logistics Modelling Efforts: A Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 701-719, November.
    12. Shoup, Donald C., 2006. "Cruising for parking," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 479-486, November.
    13. Yating Zhu & Xiaofei Ye & Jun Chen & Xingchen Yan & Tao Wang, 2020. "Impact of Cruising for Parking on Travel Time of Traffic Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Arnott, Richard & Rowse, John, 2013. "Curbside parking time limits," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 89-110.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eren Inci & Jos van Ommeren & Martijn Kobus, 2017. "The external cruising costs of parking," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(6), pages 1301-1323.
    2. Wei Wang & Yuwei Zhou & Jianbin Liu & Baofeng Sun, 2022. "On-Street Cruising for Parking Model in Consideration with Gaming Elements and Its Impact Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Inci, Eren, 2015. "A review of the economics of parking," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 50-63.
    4. Inci, Eren & Lindsey, Robin, 2015. "Garage and curbside parking competition with search congestion," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 49-59.
    5. Arnott, Richard & Inci, Eren & Rowse, John, 2015. "Downtown curbside parking capacity," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 83-97.
    6. Arnott, Richard, 2014. "On the optimal target curbside parking occupancy rate," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 133-144.
    7. Krishnamurthy, Chandra Kiran B. & Ngo, Nicole S., 2020. "The effects of smart-parking on transit and traffic: Evidence from SFpark," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Gössling, Stefan & Humpe, Andreas & Hologa, Rafael & Riach, Nils & Freytag, Tim, 2022. "Parking violations as an economic gamble for public space," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 248-257.
    9. Francis Ostermeijer & Hans RA Koster & Leonardo Nunes & Jos van Ommeren, 2021. "Citywide parking policy and traffic: Evidence from Amsterdam," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-015/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    10. Ostermeijer, Francis & Koster, Hans & Nunes, Leonardo & van Ommeren, Jos, 2022. "Citywide parking policy and traffic: Evidence from Amsterdam," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    11. Groote, Jesper De & Ommeren, Jos Van & Koster, Hans R.A., 2016. "Car ownership and residential parking subsidies: Evidence from Amsterdam," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 25-37.
    12. Tian, Qiong & Yang, Li & Wang, Chenlan & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "Dynamic pricing for reservation-based parking system: A revenue management method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 36-44.
    13. Gu, Ziyuan & Safarighouzhdi, Farshid & Saberi, Meead & Rashidi, Taha H., 2021. "A macro-micro approach to modeling parking," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 220-244.
    14. Arnott, Richard & Rowse, John, 2013. "Curbside parking time limits," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 89-110.
    15. Arnott, Richard & Inci, Eren & Rowse, John, 2011. "Downtown Parking and Traffic Congestion: A Diagrammatic Exposition," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4sb0975r, University of California Transportation Center.
    16. Kevin Hasker & Eren Inci, 2014. "Free Parking For All In Shopping Malls," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1281-1304, November.
    17. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Reimann, Felix, 2021. "On employer-paid parking and parking (cash-out) policy: A formal synthesis of different perspectives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 499-516.
    18. Arnott, Richard & Williams, Parker, 2017. "Cruising for parking around a circle," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 357-375.
    19. Xiaojuan Yu & Vincent A.C. van den Berg, 2024. "Human-driven vehicles’ cruising versus autonomous vehicles’ back- and-forth congestion: The effects on traveling, parking and congestion," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-032/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. De Borger, Bruno & Russo, Antonio, 2017. "The political economy of pricing car access to downtown commercial districts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 76-93.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0965856424004051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.