IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v193y2025ics0965856425000175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing parking for fairness — A simulation study based on an empirically calibrated model of parking behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Kappenberger, Jakob
  • Stuckenschmidt, Heiner
  • Gerdon, Frederic

Abstract

It has been widely recognized that public parking, if not managed correctly, can significantly decrease a city’s quality of life due to increased traffic and its impact on mobility and the environment. To avoid these negative effects, various parking policies have been proposed to reduce traffic while guaranteeing high accessibility, especially in city centers. This work investigates different pricing policies for public parking, including dynamic pricing and Machine Learning-based strategies that can directly optimize policy goals, such as improving mobility or accessibility. In doing so, we pay special attention to an aspect often ignored when implementing pricing policies for public parking: fairness with regard to equal outcomes for different social groups. Since the effects of pricing policies are very sensitive to financial inequality, we specifically investigate the impact of policies on different income groups. As a foundation for these experiments, we introduce a parking simulation featuring an empirically calibrated behavioral model of parking. We find that (1) dynamic pricing schemes may negatively impact fairness; (2) fair pricing for parking may require different fees for individual social groups; (3) focusing on single policy goals when devising pricing for parking results in unintended consequences; (4) Machine Learning shows potential for creating pricing strategies combining different policy goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Kappenberger, Jakob & Stuckenschmidt, Heiner & Gerdon, Frederic, 2025. "Pricing parking for fairness — A simulation study based on an empirically calibrated model of parking behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:193:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000175
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000175
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    --->

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Jaxa-Rozen & Jan H. Kwakkel, 2018. "PyNetLogo: Linking NetLogo with Python," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 21(2), pages 1-4.
    2. Ennio Cascetta, 2009. "Random Utility Theory," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Transportation Systems Analysis, chapter 0, pages 89-167, Springer.
    3. Arnott, Richard & de Palma, Andre & Lindsey, Robin, 1991. "A temporal and spatial equilibrium analysis of commuter parking," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 301-335, August.
    4. Mingardo, Giuliano & van Wee, Bert & Rye, Tom, 2015. "Urban parking policy in Europe: A conceptualization of past and possible future trends," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 268-281.
    5. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, June.
    6. Yan, Qianqian & Feng, Tao & Timmermans, Harry, 2023. "A model of household shared parking decisions incorporating equity-seeking household dynamics and leadership personality traits," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Pierce, Gregory & Shoup, Donald, 2013. "Getting the Prices Right: An Evaluation of Pricing Parking by Demand in San Francisco," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2h76j73j, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Rodríguez, Andrés & Cordera, Rubén & Alonso, Borja & dell'Olio, Luigi & Benavente, Juan, 2022. "Microsimulation parking choice and search model to assess dynamic pricing scenarios," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 253-269.
    9. Shoup, Donald, 2021. "Pricing curb parking," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 399-412.
    10. Inci, Eren, 2015. "A review of the economics of parking," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 50-63.
    11. Antolín, Gonzalo & Ibeas, Ángel & Alonso, Borja & dell'Olio, Luigi, 2018. "Modelling parking behaviour considering users heterogeneities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 23-30.
    12. Chaniotakis, Emmanouil & Pel, Adam J., 2015. "Drivers’ parking location choice under uncertain parking availability and search times: A stated preference experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 228-239.
    13. Renger H. van Nieuwkoop & Kay W. Axhausen & Thomas F. Rutherford, 2016. "A Traffic Equilibrium Model with Paid-parking Search," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 50(3), pages 262-26-286.
    14. Thompson, Russell G. & Richardson, Anthony J., 1998. "A Parking Search Model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 159-170, April.
    15. Andrés Rodríguez & Luigi dell’Olio & José Luis Moura & Borja Alonso & Rubén Cordera, 2023. "Modelling Parking Choice Behaviour Considering Alternative Availability and Systematic and Random Variations in User Tastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Hensher,David A. & Rose,John M. & Greene,William H., 2015. "Applied Choice Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107465923, Enero-Abr.
    17. Macea, Luis F. & Serrano, Iván & Carcache-Guas, Camila, 2023. "A reservation-based parking behavioral model for parking demand management in urban areas," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Renger van Nieuwkoop & Kay Axhausen & Thomas F. Rutherford, 2016. "A traffic equilibrium model with paid-parking search," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 16/236, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    19. Mark Friesen & Giuliano Mingardo, 2020. "Is Parking in Europe Ready for Dynamic Pricing? A Reality Check for the Private Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-11, March.
    20. Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly & Richard Batley, 2018. "Revisiting consistency with random utility maximisation: theory and implications for practical work," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 181-204, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodríguez, Andrés & Cordera, Rubén & Alonso, Borja & dell'Olio, Luigi & Benavente, Juan, 2022. "Microsimulation parking choice and search model to assess dynamic pricing scenarios," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 253-269.
    2. Phuc Hai Hoang & Shengchuan Zhao & Siv Eng Houn, 2019. "Motorcycle Drivers’ Parking Lot Choice Behaviors in Developing Countries: Analysis to Identify Influence Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Ben-Dor, Golan & Ogulenko, Aleksey & Klein, Ido & Ben-Elia, Eran & Benenson, Itzhak, 2024. "Simulation-based policy evaluation of monetary car driving disincentives in Jerusalem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    4. Parmar, Janak & Saiyed, Gulnazbanu & Dave, Sanjaykumar, 2023. "Analysis of taste heterogeneity in commuters’ travel decisions using joint parking– and mode–choice model: A case from urban India," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Zipeng Zhang & Ning Zhang, 2021. "Early Bird Scheme for Parking Management: How Does Parking Play a Role in the Morning Commute Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    6. José Javier Soto Martínez & Luis Gabriel M�rquez D�az & Luis Fernando Macea Mercado, 2018. "Preferencias sobre alternativas de estacionamiento en Cartagena: ¿Cuánto están dispuestos a pagar los conductores?," Revista Economía y Región, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, vol. 12(2), pages 163-180.
    7. Kemperman, Astrid, 2021. "A review of research into discrete choice experiments in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on Discrete Choice Experiments in Tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. Asplund, Disa & Pyddoke, Roger, 2021. "Optimal pricing of car use in a small city: A case study of Uppsala," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 88-103.
    9. Zhong Wang & Rui Xu, 2022. "Price Controls and Platform Ecosystem: A Comparative Analysis of Parking Applications between Beijing and London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Lehner, Stephan & Peer, Stefanie, 2019. "The price elasticity of parking: A meta-analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 177-191.
    11. Semeneh Hunachew Bayih & Surafel Luleseged Tilahun, 2024. "Dynamic vehicle parking pricing. A review," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(1), pages 35-59.
    12. Geva, Sharon & Fulman, Nir & Ben-Elia, Eran, 2022. "Getting the prices right: Drivers' cruising choices in a serious parking game," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 54-75.
    13. Krishnamurthy, Chandra Kiran B. & Ngo, Nicole S., 2020. "The effects of smart-parking on transit and traffic: Evidence from SFpark," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Daniel Albalate & Albert Gragera, 2018. "“Misinformation and Misperception in the market for parking”," IREA Working Papers 201812, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Jun 2018.
    15. José Javier Soto Martínez & Luis Gabriel Márquez Díaz & Luis Fernando Macea Mercado, 2018. "Preferencias sobre alternativas de estacionamiento en Cartagena: ¿cuánto están dispuestos a pagar los conductores?," Documentos de Trabajo 018327, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar.
    16. Janak Parmar & Gulnazbanu Saiyed & Sanjaykumar Dave, 2021. "Analysis of taste heterogeneity in commuters travel decisions using joint parking and mode choice model: A case from urban India," Papers 2109.01045, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    17. Gössling, Stefan & Humpe, Andreas & Hologa, Rafael & Riach, Nils & Freytag, Tim, 2022. "Parking violations as an economic gamble for public space," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 248-257.
    18. José Javier Soto Martínez & Luis Gabriel Márquez Díaz & Luis Fernando Macea Mercado, 2018. "Preferencias sobre alternativas de estacionamiento en Cartagena: ¿cuánto están dispuestos a pagar los conductores?," Documentos de Trabajo 018277, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar.
    19. Abdelghaffar, Hossam M. & Batista, S.F.A. & Rehman, Abdur & Cao, Jin & Menéndez, Mónica & Jabari, Saif Eddin, 2024. "Comparison of probabilistic cruising-for-parking time estimation models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    20. Nguyen Viet Long & Hoang Thuy Linh & Vu Anh Tuan, 2023. "Towards Smart Parking Management: Econometric Analysis and Modeling of Public-Parking-Choice Behavior in Three Cities of Binh Duong, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:193:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.