IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v193y2025ics0965856425000187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-objective model for fair location of stations and geofence parking area to address disorderly parking in free-floating micromobility systems

Author

Listed:
  • De Bartolomeo, Simona
  • Ottomanelli, Michele
  • Caggiani, Leonardo

Abstract

Transport within cities has been significantly changed by micromobility, particularly with the spread of shared systems. There are two types of these systems: station-based and free-floating. The former is characterised by the presence of stations in which a user can pick up or drop off a vehicle. The latter offers users the same functions but, where enabled, anywhere within the service area. Free-floating systems may appear more equitable and convenient than station-based ones, as stated in literature, but on the other hand, they can lead to unauthorised and irregular parking, obstructing pedestrians and vehicle flow. To reduce disordered parking, one of the possible solutions is to implement stations also in free-floating systems. However, this can reduce their attractiveness, forcing users to walk longer and making the system less fair. To address these issues, we proposed to convert a free-floating system into a mixed one with free-floating and station-based geofenced service sub-areas. The station locations are defined through a new multi-objective problem with the aim of finding a compromise among three objectives: the maximisation of drop-off station demand to minimise irregular parking, the minimisation of users’ walking distances in active and passive accessibility, and the minimisation of inequality in walking distance changes due to the conversion to a mixed system. This model was applied to a real case study and shows that our proposal can be of help for municipalities and operators in choosing fair station locations or a trade-off solution based on the importance they attach for one objective compared to the others.

Suggested Citation

  • De Bartolomeo, Simona & Ottomanelli, Michele & Caggiani, Leonardo, 2025. "A multi-objective model for fair location of stations and geofence parking area to address disorderly parking in free-floating micromobility systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:193:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000187
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000187
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    --->

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Owain James & J I Swiderski & John Hicks & Denis Teoman & Ralph Buehler, 2019. "Pedestrians and E-Scooters: An Initial Look at E-Scooter Parking and Perceptions by Riders and Non-Riders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Minjiao Cheng & Wenchao Wei, 2020. "An AHP-DEA Approach of the Bike-Sharing Spots Selection Problem in the Free-Floating Bike-Sharing System," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-15, September.
    3. Zhao, De & Ong, Ghim Ping, 2021. "Geo-fenced parking spaces identification for free-floating bicycle sharing system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 49-63.
    4. Caggiani, Leonardo & Colovic, Aleksandra & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2020. "An equality-based model for bike-sharing stations location in bicycle-public transport multimodal mobility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 251-265.
    5. Su, Duan & Wang, Yacan & Yang, Nan & Wang, Xianghong, 2020. "Promoting considerate parking behavior in dockless bike-sharing: An experimental study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 153-165.
    6. Roig-Costa, Oriol & Miralles-Guasch, Carme & Marquet, Oriol, 2024. "Shared bikes vs. private e-scooters. Understanding patterns of use and demand in a policy-constrained micromobility environment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 116-125.
    7. Xanthopoulos, Stavros & van der Tuin, Marieke & Sharif Azadeh, Shadi & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & van Oort, Niels & Snelder, Maaike, 2024. "Optimization of the location and capacity of shared multimodal mobility hubs to maximize travel utility in urban areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Frondel, Manuel & Vance, Colin, 2017. "Cycling on the extensive and intensive margin: The role of paths and prices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 21-31.
    9. Fan, Zhufeng & Harper, Corey D., 2024. "Taking a multimodal approach to equitable bike share station siting," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Colovic, Aleksandra & Prencipe, Luigi Pio & Giuffrida, Nadia & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2024. "A multi-objective model to design shared e-kick scooters parking spaces in large urban areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Liangpeng Gao & Yanjie Ji & Xingchen Yan & Yao Fan & Weihong Guo, 2021. "Incentive measures to avoid the illegal parking of dockless shared bikes: the relationships among incentive forms, intensity and policy compliance," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 1033-1060, April.
    12. Park, Chung & Sohn, So Young, 2017. "An optimization approach for the placement of bicycle-sharing stations to reduce short car trips: An application to the city of Seoul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 154-166.
    13. Meng, Si'an & Brown, Anne, 2021. "Docked vs. dockless equity: Comparing three micromobility service geographies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Jing & Li, Sen, 2024. "Synergizing shared micromobility and public transit towards an equitable multimodal transportation network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Colovic, Aleksandra & Prencipe, Luigi Pio & Giuffrida, Nadia & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2024. "A multi-objective model to design shared e-kick scooters parking spaces in large urban areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Teusch, Julian & Saavedra, Bruno Neumann & Scherr, Yannick Oskar & Müller, Jörg P., 2025. "Strategic planning of geo-fenced micro-mobility facilities using reinforcement learning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    4. Wang, Yacan & Li, Jingjing & Su, Duan & Zhou, Huiyu, 2023. "Spatial-temporal heterogeneity and built environment nonlinearity in inconsiderate parking of dockless bike-sharing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Leonardo Caggiani & Rosalia Camporeale & Zahra Hamidi & Chunli Zhao, 2021. "Evaluating the Efficiency of Bike-Sharing Stations with Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Zakhem, Myriam & Smith-Colin, Janille, 2024. "An E-scooter route assignment framework to improve user safety, comfort and compliance with city rules and regulations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Zheng Wen & Dongwei Tian & Naiming Wu, 2024. "Modeling and Analyzing the Spatiotemporal Travel Patterns of Bike Sharing: A Case Study of Citi Bike in New York," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu & Chua, Kelman & Yu, Honghai & Zhao, Jinhua, 2021. "E-scooter sharing to serve short-distance transit trips: A Singapore case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 177-196.
    9. Alexandra König & Laura Gebhardt & Kerstin Stark & Julia Schuppan, 2022. "A Multi-Perspective Assessment of the Introduction of E-Scooter Sharing in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Hu, Yujie & Zhang, Yongping & Lamb, David & Zhang, Mingming & Jia, Peng, 2019. "Examining and optimizing the BCycle bike-sharing system – A pilot study in Colorado, US," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 1-12.
    11. Li, Haojie & Zhang, Yingheng & Zhu, Manman & Ren, Gang, 2021. "Impacts of COVID-19 on the usage of public bicycle share in London," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 140-155.
    12. Draženko Glavić & Ana Trpković & Marina Milenković & Sreten Jevremović, 2021. "The E-Scooter Potential to Change Urban Mobility—Belgrade Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, May.
    13. Tiziana Campisi & Anastasios Skoufas & Alexandros Kaltsidis & Socrates Basbas, 2021. "Gender Equality and E-Scooters: Mind the Gap! A Statistical Analysis of the Sicily Region, Italy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    14. Bi, Hui & Gao, Hui & Li, Aoyong & Ye, Zhirui, 2024. "Using topic modeling to unravel the nuanced effects of built environment on bicycle-metro integrated usage," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    15. Murray, Alan T., 2021. "Contemporary optimization application through geographic information systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Lili Yang & Simeng Fei & Hongfei Jia & Jingdong Qi & Luyao Wang & Xinning Hu, 2023. "Study on the Relationship between the Spatial Distribution of Shared Bicycle Travel Demand and Urban Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Berke, Alex & Truitt, Walter & Larson, Kent, 2024. "Is access to public bike-share networks equitable? A multiyear spatial analysis across 5 U.S. Cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    18. Zhou, Zhaoqi & Schwanen, Tim, 2024. "Exploring the production of spatial inequality in dockless bicycle sharing in Shenzhen," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Ma, Xinwei & Zhang, Shuai & Wu, Tao & Yang, Yizhe & Yu, Jiajie, 2023. "Can dockless and docked bike-sharing substitute each other? Evidence from Nanjing, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    20. Park, Chung & Lee, Jungpyo & Sohn, So Young, 2019. "Recommendation of feeder bus routes using neural network embedding-based optimization," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 329-341.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:193:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.