Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Role-Playing as an Embodied Cognition Strategy to Enhance Learning Outcomes in the Empathize and Define Stages of Design Thinking Within Project-Based Design Courses

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning and Collaboration Technologies (HCII 2025)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 15806))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 243 Accesses

Abstract

In design education, project-based learning and design thinking emphasize the development of higher-order cognitive skills, including critical thinking and problem-solving. However, students often rely on intuitive, fast thinking (System 1), leading to premature solutions during the empathize and define stages. Dual Process Theory suggests that design thinking requires slower, reflective thinking (System 2) for effective problem analysis. Role-playing, as an embodied learning strategy, provides an opportunity to bridge the gap between these two types of thinking by engaging students physically and emotionally. However, its impact on learning outcomes during these stages remains unclear. This study explored how role-playing with varying embodiment levels influenced comprehension, retention, and transferability in the empathize and define stages of design thinking. Ninety undergraduate design students were randomly assigned to three groups: high-embodiment, low-embodiment, and control. The high-embodiment group engaged in sensorimotor role-playing, while the low-embodiment group focused on verbal interactions, and the control group followed a lecture-based approach. The study included pre-tests, post-tests, and delayed tests to assess outcomes. Results showed that role-playing, particularly high-embodiment, significantly improved comprehension, retention, and the ability to transfer knowledge to new contexts. These findings suggest that embodied learning strategies, especially high-embodiment role-playing, enhance cognitive engagement and support deeper reflective thinking in design education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 69.54
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 87.73
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

') var buybox = document.querySelector("[data-id=id_"+ timestamp +"]").parentNode var buyingOptions = buybox.querySelectorAll(".buying-option") ;[].slice.call(buyingOptions).forEach(initCollapsibles) var buyboxMaxSingleColumnWidth = 480 function initCollapsibles(subscription, index) { var toggle = subscription.querySelector(".buying-option-price") subscription.classList.remove("expanded") var form = subscription.querySelector(".buying-option-form") var priceInfo = subscription.querySelector(".price-info") var buyingOption = toggle.parentElement if (toggle && form && priceInfo) { toggle.setAttribute("role", "button") toggle.setAttribute("tabindex", "0") toggle.addEventListener("click", function (event) { var expandedBuyingOptions = buybox.querySelectorAll(".buying-option.expanded") var buyboxWidth = buybox.offsetWidth ;[].slice.call(expandedBuyingOptions).forEach(function(option) { if (buyboxWidth buyboxMaxSingleColumnWidth) { toggle.click() } else { if (index === 0) { toggle.click() } else { toggle.setAttribute("aria-expanded", "false") form.hidden = "hidden" priceInfo.hidden = "hidden" } } }) } initialStateOpen() if (window.buyboxInitialised) return window.buyboxInitialised = true initKeyControls() })()

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwab, K.: The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Business, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garca Ferrari, T.: Design and the fourth industrial revolution. dangers and opportunities for a mutating discipline. Des. J. S2625–S2633 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liedtka, J.: Perspective: linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 32(6), 925–938 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans, J.S.B.: Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59(1), 255–278 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Milli, S., Lieder, F., Griffiths, T.L.: A rational reinterpretation of dual-process theories. Cognition 217, 104881 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore, D., Sauder, J., Jin, Y.: A dual-process analysis of design idea generation. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, p. V007T07A017. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, Y.S., Park, J.A.: Design thinking in the framework of visual thinking and characterization of service design ideation methods using visual reasoning model. Des. J. 24(6), 931–953 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lu, P., Li, Z., Li, J., Hsiao, S.W.: A consumer-oriented design thinking model for product design education. Interact. Learn. Environ. 31(8), 4753–4771 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pieroni, M.P., McAloone, T.C., Pigosso, D.C.: Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: a review of approaches. J. Clean. Prod. 215, 198–216 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lahiri, A., Cormican, K., Sampaio, S.: Design thinking: from products to projects. Procedia Comput. Sci. 181, 141–148 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, G.: Digital reframing: the design thinking of redesigning traditional products into innovative digital products. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 39(1), 95–118 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Magana, A.J., Balachandran, S.: Unpacking students’ conceptualizations through haptic feedback. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 33(5), 513–531 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hung, I.C., Hsu, H.H., Chen, N.S., Kinshuk.: Communicating through body: a situated embodiment-based strategy with flag semaphore for procedural knowledge construction. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 63, 749–769 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson-Glenberg, M.C., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Birchfield, D.A., Savio-Ramos, C.: Effects of embodied learning and digital platform on the retention of physics content: centripetal force. Front. Psychol. 7, 1819 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dede, C.: Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science 323(5910), 66–69 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Castro-Alonso, J.C., Ayres, P., Paas, F.: Animations showing Lego manipulative tasks: three potential moderators of effectiveness. Comput. Educ. 85, 1–13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., Slovic, P.: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Evans, J.S.B.: Dual-process theories of reasoning: contemporary issues and developmental applications. Dev. Rev. 31(2–3), 86–102 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F., Toplak, M.E.: The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models. Dev. Rev. 31(2–3), 103–118 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reyna, V.F., Brainerd, C.J.: Dual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience: a fuzzy-trace model. Dev. Rev. 31(2–3), 180–206 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ricco, R.B., Overton, W.F.: Dual systems competence-procedural processing: a relational developmental systems approach to reasoning. Dev. Rev. 31(2–3), 119–150 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson-Glenberg, M.C.: Immersive VR and education: embodied design principles that include gesture and hand controls. Front. Robot. AI 5, 375272 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kontra, C., Lyons, D.J., Fischer, S.M., Beilock, S.L.: Physical experience enhances science learning. Psychol. Sci. 26(6), 737–749 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson-Glenberg, M.C., Birchfield, D.A., Tolentino, L., Koziupa, T.: Collaborative embodied learning in mixed reality motion-capture environments: two science studies. J. Educ. Psychol. 106(1), 86–99 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Slater, M., Wilbur, S.: A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 6(6), 603–616 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fischer, K.W., Immordino-Yang, M.H.: The fundamental importance of the brain and learning for education. Mind Brain Educ. 2, 1–7 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cross, N.: Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Des. Issues 17(3), 49–55 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kahneman, D.: Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kolb, D.A.: Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, 2nd edn. Pearson Education, New Jersey (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Siemens, G.: Learning analytics: the emergence of a discipline. Am. Behav. Sci. 57(10), 1380–1400 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Popenici, S.A., Kerr, S.: Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 12(1), 22 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mystakidis, S.: Metaverse. Encyclopedia 2(1), 486–497 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nottingham Ningbo China, 199 Taikang East Road, Ningbo, 315100, China

    Yuhan Luo, Bingjian Liu, Nai Yeen Gavin Lai, Guang Li & Wai Siong Chai

  2. Zhejiang Wanli University, 8 Qianhu Road, Ningbo, 315100, China

    Pengxiang Jia

Authors
  1. Yuhan Luo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pengxiang Jia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bingjian Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nai Yeen Gavin Lai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guang Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wai Siong Chai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhan Luo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA

    Brian K. Smith

  2. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

    Marcela Borge

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Luo, Y., Jia, P., Liu, B., Lai, N.Y.G., Li, G., Chai, W.S. (2025). Role-Playing as an Embodied Cognition Strategy to Enhance Learning Outcomes in the Empathize and Define Stages of Design Thinking Within Project-Based Design Courses. In: Smith, B.K., Borge, M. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. HCII 2025. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15806. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93564-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93564-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-93563-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-93564-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics