The special sauce at the core of all great art, visual or otherwise, is that it is the product of the human experience and talent. When we look at Michelangelo’s David, or a scene from Irving Penn’s , Worlds In a Small Room, beyond the beauty, we bear witness to what the human spirit can generate and that perhaps , we too might be capabl…
The special sauce at the core of all great art, visual or otherwise, is that it is the product of the human experience and talent. When we look at Michelangelo’s David, or a scene from Irving Penn’s , Worlds In a Small Room, beyond the beauty, we bear witness to what the human spirit can generate and that perhaps , we too might be capable of such an accomplishment. At the moment, all I can see being inspired to with AI, is a career in programming .
I respectfully disagree. Using AI creatively still requires an artist's input, not a programmer's. At least, as far as I understand it. It's like when PCs first became mainstream, us old school graphic designers were peeved because all of a sudden everyone thought they were designers. Nope. The quality of the output still takes talent and skill.
The special sauce at the core of all great art, visual or otherwise, is that it is the product of the human experience and talent. When we look at Michelangelo’s David, or a scene from Irving Penn’s , Worlds In a Small Room, beyond the beauty, we bear witness to what the human spirit can generate and that perhaps , we too might be capable of such an accomplishment. At the moment, all I can see being inspired to with AI, is a career in programming .
I respectfully disagree. Using AI creatively still requires an artist's input, not a programmer's. At least, as far as I understand it. It's like when PCs first became mainstream, us old school graphic designers were peeved because all of a sudden everyone thought they were designers. Nope. The quality of the output still takes talent and skill.