Skip to main content
Welcome to the United Nations
    • العربية
    • 中文
    • Nederlands
    • English
    • Français
    • Kreyòl
    • हिन्दी
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Русский
    • Español
    • Kiswahili
    • Türkçe
    • Українська
UN logo
Hate Speech

Search the United Nations

A-Z Site Index
  • Home
  • Understanding hate speech »
    • What is hate speech?
    • Hate speech vs freedom of speech
    • Hate speech and real harm
    • FAQs
  • Impact and prevention »
    • Why tackle hate speech?
    • A pandemic of hate
    • The many challenges of tracking hate
    • Targets of hate
    • The preventive role of education
  • UN Strategy and Plan of Action
  • UN actions »
    • The role of the United Nations
    • International human rights law
    • Further UN initiatives
  • Take action »
    • Engage
    • Teach and learn
    • Test yourself
    • Videos
  • International Day
  • Events
  • Resources »
    • Key human rights instruments
    • Thematic publications
    • Fact sheets [PDF]
    • UN offices, bodies, agencies, programmes
    • News
    • Podcast

Understanding hate speech

Hate speech versus freedom of speech

The need to preserve freedom of expression from censorship by States or private corporations’ is often invoked to counter efforts to regulate hateful expression, in particular online.

Freedom of opinion and expression are, indeed, cornerstones of human rights and pillars of free and democratic societies. These freedoms support other fundamental rights, such as to peaceful assembly, to participate in public affairs, and to freedom of religion. It is undeniable that digital media, including social media, have bolstered the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas. Therefore, legislative efforts to regulate free expression unsurprisingly raise concerns that attempts to curb hate speech may silence dissent and opposition.

To counter hate speech, the United Nations supports more positive speech and upholds respect for freedom of expression as the norm. Therefore, any restrictions must be an exception and seek to prevent harm and ensure equality or the public participation of all. Alongside the relevant international human rights law provisions, the UN Rabat Plan of Action provides key guidance to States on the difference between freedom of expression and “incitement” (to discrimination, hostility and violence), which is prohibited under criminal law. Determining when the potential of harm is high enough to justify prohibiting speech is still the subject of much debate. But States can also use alternative tools – such as education and promoting counter-messages – to address the whole spectrum of hateful expression, both on and offline.

 
“Addressing hate speech does not mean limiting or prohibiting freedom of speech. It means keeping hate speech from escalating into something more dangerous, particularly incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence, which is prohibited under international law.”

— United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, May 2019

 
United Nations
Donate
  • A-Z Site Index
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • FAQ
  • Fraud Alert
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use