Skip to main content
Molecular Pain logoLink to Molecular Pain
. 2024 Feb 7;20:17448069241230419. doi: 10.1177/17448069241230419

Isolectin B4 (IB4)-conjugated streptavidin for the selective knockdown of proteins in IB4-positive (+) nociceptors

Oliver Bogen 1, Dionéia Araldi 1, Anatol Sucher 2, Kord Kober 2, Peter T Ohara 3, Jon D Levine 1,4,
PMCID: PMC10851726  PMID: 38246917

Abstract

In vivo analysis of protein function in nociceptor subpopulations using antisense oligonucleotides and short interfering RNAs is limited by their non-selective cellular uptake. To address the need for selective transfection methods, we covalently linked isolectin B4 (IB4) to streptavidin and analyzed whether it could be used to study protein function in IB4(+)-nociceptors. Rats treated intrathecally with IB4-conjugated streptavidin complexed with biotinylated antisense oligonucleotides for protein kinase C epsilon (PKCε) mRNA were found to have: (a) less PKCε in dorsal root ganglia (DRG), (b) reduced PKCε expression in IB4(+) but not IB4(–) DRG neurons, and (c) fewer transcripts of the PKCε gene in the DRG. This knockdown in PKCε expression in IB4(+) DRG neurons is sufficient to reverse hyperalgesic priming, a rodent model of chronic pain that is dependent on PKCε in IB4(+)-nociceptors. These results establish that IB4-streptavidin can be used to study protein function in a defined subpopulation of nociceptive C-fiber afferents.

Keywords: Antisense oligonucleotides, hyperalgesic priming, Isolectin B4, nociceptors, ligand-conjugated antisense, pain

Introduction

Nociceptors are a heterogeneous group of sensory neurons specialized for the detection of potentially tissue damaging stimuli. 1 Most nociceptors are either thinly myelinated Aδ-or unmyelinated C-fiber neurons. 2 Based on differences in neurotrophin dependence and the expression of neuropeptides, C-fiber nociceptors have been further divided into nerve growth factor (NGF)-dependent, peptidergic and glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF)-dependent, non-peptidergic, nociceptors. 3 The latter class can, at least in rodents, 4 also be characterized by binding to isolectin B4 (IB4),5,6 a homotetrameric carbohydrate-binding protein from the African shrub Griffonia simplicifolia with high binding specificity for terminal α-D galactopyranose residues.7,8

IB4(+)-nociceptors that have been exposed to an inflammatory or neuropathic insult develop long-lasting latent hypersensitivity to inflammatory mediators.912 This phenomenon, hyperalgesic priming, can be demonstrated in behavioral experiments as an enhanced and prolonged hyperalgesic response to the pro-inflammatory cytokine prostaglandin E2 (PGE2).13,14 The associated neuroplasticity in the phenotype of IB4(+) nociceptors depends on protein kinase C epsilon (PKCε) and can be explained by a switch in the intracellular signaling pathway mediating PGE2 hyperalgesia.1518

Binding of IB4 to α-D galactoside containing glycoconjugates on the plasma membrane of GDNF-dependent, non-peptidergic C-fiber nociceptors induces receptor-mediated endocytosis.19,20 Various laboratories have used this finding to selectively ablate non-peptidergic C-fibers with IB4-conjugated saporin in order to investigate their functional contribution to pain.2124 Based on these studies, we sought to analyze whether this cellular uptake mechanism could be used for the specific transfection of GDNF-dependent, non-peptidergic nociceptors with antisense oligonucleotides. Here we used IB4-conjugated streptavidin to transfect non-peptidergic C-fibers with a biotinylated antisense oligonucleotide to PKCε mRNA and analyzed its effect on hyperalgesic priming, a well-characterized model for the transition from acute to chronic pain in rodents.13,14

Material and methods

Animals

All experiments were performed on 260–320 g adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories, Hollister, CA, USA). Animals were housed in a controlled environment (21–23°C, 12-h day-night cycle, food and water were available ad libitum) in the animal care facility at the University of California, San Francisco. Experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of California at San Francisco and in compliance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Every effort was made to minimize the number of animals used in experiments and their suffering.

Randall-Selitto paw-pressure test

Mechanical nociceptive threshold was quantified using an Ugo Basile Analgesymeter® (Stoelting, Chicago, IL, USA), a device that uses a cone-shaped pusher with a rounded tip, to apply a linearly increasing mechanical force to the dorsum of a rat’s hind paw, as previously described.25,26 Rats were lightly restrained in a cylindrical acrylic tube that has lateral ports at one end, to allow easy access to the hind paw for mechanical nociceptive threshold testing. Rats were acclimatized to the testing procedure by placing them in the restrainers and training them with the Analgesymeter for ∼2 h per day for three consecutive days before measuring baseline mechanical nociceptive threshold. Nociceptive threshold was defined as the force in grams at which a rat withdrew its paw. Baseline mechanical nociceptive threshold was defined as the mean of the three readings taken before test agents were injected.

Drugs and their administration

The selective PKCε agonist, psi ε receptor for activated C kinase (ψεRACK) 27 was purchased from Biomatik (Wilmington, DE, USA), and the proinflammatory cytokine prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2) from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). The selection of drug doses was based on dose-response relationships determined during earlier studies.15,28 Stock solutions of PGE2 (1 µg/µl) in 100% ethanol (EtOH) were diluted (1:50) with physiological saline (0.9% NaCl) immediately before intradermal injection. The EtOH concentration of the final PGE2 solution was 2% (w/v) and the injection volume 5 µl. ψεRACK was dissolved and diluted in physiological saline (cfinal = 0.4 µg/µl). ψεRACK (1 µg) was administered by hypotonic shock as previously described. 12 All drugs were administered via a 30-gauge beveled hypodermic needle connected to a Hamilton micro syringe with polyethylene tubing (PE-10).

Covalent conjugation of streptavidin to IB4

The streptavidin conjugation kit (cat. #: ab 102921) was purchased from Abcam (Waltham, MA, USA) and IB4 (cat. #: L-1104-1) was purchased from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA, USA). All reagents were equilibrated to room temperature (RT) before use. 100 μL of IB4 (c = 2.15 mg/mL), dissolved in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS), was activated by the addition of 20 μL of modifier reagent of the streptavidin conjugation kit, and then pipetted onto 100 μg of streptavidin (stochiometric ratio between IB4 and streptavidin = 1:1). This solution was gently mixed and incubated at room temperature for 24 h in the dark. Free excess amine groups on IB4 and streptavidin were inactivated by adding 20 μL of quenching reagent of the streptavidin conjugation kit to the reaction mixture. IB4-streptavidin conjugate was stored at 4°C until use.

Intrathecal injection of antisense oligonucleotides

The antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) for PKCε, Biotin-GCO AGC TOG ATO TTG OGC OC (O = C-phosphorthioate) directed against a unique region of the rat mRNA was synthesized by Invitrogen (Waltham, MA, USA). The corresponding GenBank accession number and ODN position within the mRNA sequence are NM_017171.2 and 420-439, respectively. We have previously proven that this antisense ODN for PKCε can be used to downregulate PKCε expression in rat DRG.9,26 The corresponding sense ODN sequence for PKCε, Biotin-GGE CGC AFG ATO GAG OTG EC (E = G-phosphorthioate, F = A-phosphorthioate), was used as the control. ODNs were dissolved in ultrapure water to a final concentration of 100 pmol/µl, aliquoted and stored at −20°C, until use.

For each injection 2.3 μL IB4-streptavidin (30 pmol of conjugate with 120 pmol of biotin binding sites), 1.2 μL biotinylated ODN (c = 100 pmol/μl) and 16.5 μL PBS were mixed (injection volume = 20 μL), incubated at RT for 5 min and transferred into a 3/10 cc insulin syringe with a 29-gauge ultra-fine 1/2-inch fixed hypodermic needle (Walgreens, Deerfield, Il, USA). Rats were briefly anesthetized with 2.5% isoflurane (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, St Joseph, MO, USA) to facilitate intrathecal injection, and the hypodermic needle inserted into the subarachnoid space on the midline, between the L4 and L5 vertebrae. 29 The intrathecal site of injection was confirmed by the elicitation of a tail flick produced by the insertion of the needle into the intrathecal space and injection of the solution. 30 Intrathecal injections were performed on day 1, 4 and 7 and DRG harvested on day 10, to be used for either Western blotting, quantitative real-time PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) or immunohistochemical analysis.

Tissue harvesting

Rats treated with antisense or sense ODN were euthanized by exsanguination while under deep isoflurane anesthesia. Then L4 and L5 DRG were surgically removed, snap frozen on dry ice and stored at −80°C until further processing.

Protein extraction

DRG were transferred into homogenization buffer [150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 2 mM EDTA, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)] supplemented with complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN, USA) and manually homogenized with a plastic pestle in an Eppendorf tube. Proteins were extracted by incubating the homogenate for 2 h at RT in an Eppendorf thermomixer at 1400 r/min and separated from insoluble components by centrifugation for 15 min at 14,000 r/min in a tabletop centrifuge (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Protein concentration of the samples was determined using the micro-BCA protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, Il, USA) with BSA as a standard.

Western blotting

Changes in PKCε expression were evaluated by Western blotting. Briefly, 20 μg of protein per sample were mixed with 4 x sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 3% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.025% bromophenol blue), denatured by shaking for 10 min at 500 r/min and 90°C in an Eppendorf thermomixer, and electrophoresed on a 4%–15% precast polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in 25 mM Tris buffer containing 192 mM glycine and 0.1% SDS. Proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (NC) using the semidry blotting method (transfer time 1 h at 10 V with 47.9 mM Tris, 38.9 mM glycine, 0.038% SDS and 20% methanol). The blotting membrane was saturated by shaking in Tris buffered saline (TBS), pH 7.4, containing 5% BSA and 0.1% Tween 20 (antibody dilution buffer) for 1 h at RT. The NC membrane was cut in half at ∼64 kDa and the upper half of the membrane was probed at 4°C overnight with a 1:500 dilution of a rabbit anti-PKCε antibody (sc-214, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, USA) in antibody dilution buffer, while the lower half was probed at 4°C overnight with a 1:1000 dilution of a rabbit anti-β actin antibody (ab8227, Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA), in antibody dilution buffer. Blots were rinsed with TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (3 times for 15 min under shaking at RT) and probed with an anti-rabbit HRP conjugated antibody (NA934V, GE healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) for 2 h at RT. Blots were rinsed with TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (3 times for 15 min under shaking at RT) and PKCε and β-actin immunoreactivities were visualized with the enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Pierce) and analyzed by computer-assisted densitometry. 31

Immunohistochemistry

Rats received three intrathecal injections of either IB4-streptavidin complexed with biotinylated antisense or sense oligonucleotides against PKCε mRNA on day 1, 4 and 7. On day 10 rats were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and perfused through the left ventricle with 100 mL cold PBS containing 10 U heparin/ml PBS followed by 300 mL methanol-buffered 10% formalin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). L4 and L5 DRG were dissected out and transferred to PBS with 30% sucrose and stored overnight at 4°C. The DRGs were then embedded in Tissue Tek (OCT compound, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA), sectioned in a Leica cryostat at 10 µm and mounted on gelatinized microscope slides (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA).

Tissue Tek was removed by rinsing the DRG tissue sections twice with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (TBST). Tissue sections were incubated for 1 h at room temperature (RT) in TBST, with 10% normal goat serum (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA) (antibody dilution buffer). Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with a 1:500 dilution of a Rabbit (Rb) anti-PKCε antibody (sc-214, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in antibody dilution buffer, washed three times for 10 min each at RT with TBST and probed for 2 h at RT with a 1:500 dilution of an Alexa Fluor conjugated Goat anti-Rb antibody (Invitrogen cat. #: A11012) and a 1:1000 dilution of IB4-FITC (Invitrogen, cat. #: I21411) in antibody dilution buffer supplemented with 0.1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM MnCl2, 0.1 mM MgCl2 for 2h at RT. 6 Sections were washed three times for 10 min at RT with TBST supplemented with 0.1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM MnCl2, 0.1 mM MgCl2 and mounted with DAPI containing mounting media (Invitrogen, cat. #: P36935).

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA from L4 and L5 DRG was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen) and the “PureLinkTM RNA Mini Kit” (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The RNA concentration in each sample was determined using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Santa Clara, CA, USA). RNA was transcribed into cDNA using the “iScriptTM Advanced cDNA Synthesis Kit for RT-qPCR” (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The real-time PCR was performed with the “SsoAdvancedTM Universal SYBR Green Supermix” (Bio-Rad) and specific primers for PKCε (Bio-Rad, assay ID: qRnoCID0008431) on the CFX 96TM real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad). The PCR program was run under the following conditions: 2 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, and 30 s at 60°C. Each sample was run in triplicate. Change in gene expression was determined by the 2−ΔΔCT method and expressed as relative change compared to control level. 32 Glycerinaldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) RNA was used as reference gene (Bio-Rad, assay ID: qRnoCID0057018).

Statistical analysis

(a) Western blot and quantitative real-time PCR: Statistical comparisons were made with GraphPad Prism 10 statistical software (GraphPad Software In., La Jolla, CA, USA). Comparison between treatments were performed using Student’s t-test and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. (b) Immunohistochemistry: Statistical comparisons were made with GraphPad Prism 10 statistical software. Comparisons between treatments were performed using contingency testing and Fisher’s exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. (c) Behavior: Statistical comparisons were made with GraphPad Prism 10 statistical software. Comparisons between treatments were performed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Post hoc analysis. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Data availability

The data generated in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Results

Transfection with IB4-streptavidin

To evaluate whether IB4-streptavidin can be used as a transfection reagent, rats were treated with a complex of IB4-streptavidin and biotinylated antisense ODN (or for the control biotinylated sense ODN) directed against PKCε mRNA. Two groups of three rats each received three intrathecal injections on days 1, 4 and 7 before their L4 and L5 DRG were harvested on day 10. Western blot analysis of protein extracts from DRG from the group that had been subjected to the antisense ODN treatment showed a significant decrease (∼40%) in the PKCε expression (9.5 ± 1.2 a.u., [N = 3]) compared to the group that was treated with the sense ODN sequence (15.9 +/− 1.3 a.u., [N = 3], Student’s t-test, p = .01, Figure 1(a) and (b)) indicating successful knockdown of PKCε.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Effect of intrathecal PKCε antisense oligonucleotides on PKCε expression in rat lumbar dorsal root ganglia. (a) Western blot image of protein extracts from L4/L5 dorsal root ganglia of rats treated with either biotinylated PKCε sense (SE) or antisense (AS) oligonucleotides (bound to IB4 streptavidin). The calculated molecular weight of PKCε is ∼83.5 kDa (according to UniProt database entry P09216). β-Actin was used as a loading control. Its calculated molecular weight is ∼42 kDa (according to UniProt database entry P60711). (b) Column bar graph showing normalized PKCε immunoreactivity in both groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with N = 3 in each group (p < .05).

Immunohistochemistry

To analyze whether the downregulation of PKCε expression is restricted to IB4-positive DRG neurons, an immunohistochemical analysis was performed. Two groups of three rats each received three intrathecal injections of either biotinylated PKCε sense oligonucleotides bound to IB4-streptavidin or biotinylated PKCε antisense oligonucleotides bound to IB4-streptavidin on days 1, 4, and 7. Three days later, rats were transcardially perfused with 4% PFA, their L4 and L5 DRG excised and analyzed for PKCε immunoreactivity (Figure 2). A contingency test was performed to compare the proportion of IB4(+)/PKCε(+) neurons between DRGs from rats treated with the IB4-streptavidin biotinylated-PKCε sense ODN complex and rats treated with the IB4-streptavidin biotinylated PKCε antisense ODN complex (IB4(+)/PKCε(+) in PKCε sense ODN-treated rats [31%, 191/600 neurons, 95% CI = (28-35)%], in PKCε antisense ODN-treated rats [19%, 117/600 neurons, 95% CI = (16-22)%]). Fisher’s exact test shows a significant difference between IB4(+)/PKCε(+) neurons in DRG of rats treated with IB4-streptavidin biotinylated PKCε sense ODN and those treated with IB4-streptavidin biotinylated PKCε antisense ODN [p < .0001, N = 600/group (3 rats per group with 200 neurons/DRG per rat; 95% CI were calculated using the Wilson/Brown method)]. A second contingency test was performed to compare the proportion of IB4(−)/PKCε(+) neurons between DRGs from rats treated with the biotinylated PKCε sense ODN IB4-streptavidin complex and rats that were treated with the biotinylated PKCε antisense ODN IB4-streptavidin complex (IB4(−)/PKCε(+) in PKCε sense ODN-treated rats [10%, 65/600 neurons, 95% CI = (8–13)%], in PKCε antisense ODN-treated rats [11%, 70/600 neurons, 95% CI = (9-14)%]). Fisher’s exact test shows no significant difference between IB4(−)/PKCε(+) neurons in DRG of rats treated with IB4-streptavidin bound to biotinylated PKCε sense ODN and those treated with IB4-streptavidin bound to biotinylated PKCε antisense ODN [p = .7, N = 600/group (3 rats per group with 200 neurons/DRG per rat; 95% CI were calculated using the Wilson/Brown method). These results demonstrate that the knockdown in PKCε expression is limited to IB4-positive (+) neurons, most of which are known to be non-peptidergic C-fiber nociceptors.33,34

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Knockdown of PKCε in IB4(+) C-fiber afferents. Representative images from L4/L5 DRG from rats treated with either IB4-streptavidin biotinylated PKCε sense ODN (upper image panels) or IB4-streptavidin biotinylated PKCε antisense ODN (lower image panels). Color coding: Red = PKCε immunoreactivity, Blue = DAPI, Green = IB4 immunoreactivity, Yellow = PKCε/IB4 colocalization. Note that up to 40% of all DRG neurons in the rat are IB4 positive (+) and the vast majority are small diameter C-fiber DRG neurons. PKCε immunoreactivity can be observed in small-, medium-, and large-diameter DRG neurons. Interestingly, the vast majority of PKCε expressing DRG (∼90%) are IB4 positive (+). Scale bar = 50 µm.

Quantitative real-time PCR

To determine whether the decrease in PKCε protein levels in rat DRG is due to antisense ODN-stimulated degradation of transcripts of the PKCε gene or to a reduction in the frequency with which the PKCε mRNAs are translated into the corresponding amino acid sequence we performed a real-time PCR. Rats received three intrathecal injections with either IB4-streptavidin complexed with biotinylated antisense oligonucleotides to PKCε, or IB4-streptavidin complexed with biotinylated sense oligonucleotides to PKCε, on days 1, 4 and 7 before their L4 and L5 DRG were harvested on day 10. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of RNA extracts from DRG from rats subjected to the antisense treatment showed a significant decrease in the number of PKCε transcripts (24% ± 2.3%, [N = 6], p < .0001, Figure 3) compared to the group of rats treated with the sense sequence, suggesting that the reduction in cellular PKCε protein levels is caused by a reduction in the number of transcripts of the PKCε gene in rat DRGs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Effect of intrathecal PKCε antisense oligonucleotides on PKCε transcripts in rat L4 and L5 DRG. The histogram depicts the level of PKCε expression in rats treated with either a complex of IB4streptavidin/biotinylated PKCε sense ODN (left) or IB4 streptavidin/biotinylated antisense ODN (right). Gene expression was determined with SYBR green RT-PCR and values (mean ± SEM) represent expression relative to GAPDH. Rats treated with IB4 streptavidin/biotinylated PKCε antisense ODN show a significant decrease in their PKCε mRNA levels compared to those treated with a mixture of IB4 streptavidin/biotinylated PKCε sense ODN (Student’s t-test, p = .0001, N = 6 for each group).

Reversal of hyperalgesic priming in IB4(+)-nociceptors

Finally, to assess the potential therapeutic utility of our transfection method, we tested the efficacy of the knockdown on hyperalgesic priming, a well-characterized preclinical model of chronic pain 13 known to be dependent on PKCε activity in IB4(+)-nociceptors.10,11 Rats were first primed with the selective PKCε activator ψεRACK, 15 then treated with the complex of IB4-streptavidin and biotinylated PKCε antisense ODN (or biotinylated PKCε sense ODN for the control), and finally tested for the presence of hyperalgesic priming. Rats treated with the IB4-streptavidin biotinylated PKCε sense ODN complex demonstrate prolonged PGE2 hyperalgesia, a behavioral phenotype that characterizes the presence of hyperalgesic priming (Figure 4).9,13 Rats treated with the IB4-streptavidin biotinylated PKCε antisense ODN complex only show the short lasting PGE2 hyperalgesia, a behavioral phenotype that characterizes the wild-type nociceptor.9,13 These results demonstrate that the knockdown of PKCε in IB4(+)-DRG neurons can reverse the neuroplastic changes associated with the primed IB4(+)-nociceptor.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Reversal of hyperalgesic priming: Rats were primed by the intradermal administration of ψεRACK. Starting 3 days after the injection of ψεRACK, rats received intrathecal injections on day 1, 4, and 7 of IB4-streptavidin complexed with either biotinylated sense or antisense ODN for PKCε mRNA. Three days after the last injection PGE2 was administered into the same site as ψεRACK before. To test for hyperalgesic priming nociceptive paw withdrawal thresholds were measured prior to and 30 min and 4 h post intradermal administration of PGE2. PGE2-induced hyperalgesia remained elevated at 4h in sense-treated rats, indicating the presence of priming. However, hyperalgesia was not present at the 4th h in antisense-treated rats, showing its ability to reverse priming. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA for the baseline readings showed no significant effect of treatment (F1,10 = 0, p > .999), time (F2,20 = 1.25, p = .308) and treatment by time interaction (F2,20 = 1.67, p = .225). These results show that the two ODN groups did not differ significantly until the PGE2 injection. A second two-way repeated measures ANOVA that included the two post-PGE2 injection time points showed significant effects for treatment (F1,10 = 159, p < .0001), time (F1,10 = 426.2, p < .0001) and treatment by time interaction (F1,10 = 277.9, p < .0001). Post hoc analysis revealed significant differences between sense and antisense treated rats only 4 h post PGE2 administration (t20 = 19.74, p < .0001).

Discussion

Opioids are the most effective analgesics for moderate to severe (acute, perioperative, posttraumatic and chronic) pain. 35 However, their many undesirable side effects such as analgesic tolerance and physical dependence, opioid-induced hyperalgesia and respiratory depression mandate the development of novel analgesics. 36 Therapeutic oligonucleotides are a possible solution.3740 Antisense oligonucleotides, or small interfering RNAs, are potent and highly specific,4143 safe,4143 their mode of action is understood,4447 and their in vivo stability has been significantly increased in recent years through chemical modifications.4143,45,48 In addition, their use has already contributed to a better understanding of many pain syndromes.18,4954

One of the problems still to be solved is how to limit the uptake of the oligonucleotides to specific cell types.44,46,55 The most promising method to date involves the conjugation of oligonucleotides to ligands known to bind to cell surface molecules that are exclusively expressed by the target cells and whose binding is known to trigger the cellular uptake of the ligand-conjugated oligonucleotide via receptor-mediated endocytosis.5661 Here we have used this approach to transfect a subpopulation of C-fiber nociceptors implicated in specific pain syndromes (e.g., oxaliplatin-induced painful peripheral neuropathy 62 and spinal nerve ligation 63 ) with antisense oligonucleotides for PKCε mRNA. Our Western blot data show that a molecular conjugate of IB4-streptavidin complexed with biotinylated PKCε antisense oligonucleotides can be used to attenuate levels of PKCε in the rat dorsal root ganglia (Figure 1). This result is consistent with the findings that IB4 binds to glycosylated cell surface molecules at a large number of small diameter sensory neurons,6466 streptavidin is a biotin binding molecule,67,68 and the antisense sequence we used is known to effectively downregulate PKCε expression in rat DRG.9,26 Our immunohistological data show that the downregulation of PKCε is restricted to IB4-binding neurons (Figure 2), most of which are known to be non-peptidergic C-fiber nociceptors.33,34 This result is consistent with findings that IB4 binding to α-D-galactosides induces cellular uptake of the “ligand-receptor complex” through receptor-mediated endocytosis.19,20 Our real-time PCR results show that the number of transcripts of the PKCε gene in RNA samples from DRG from rats treated with antisense oligonucleotides is lower than in RNA samples from DRG from rats treated with the sense oligonucleotides (Figure 3). This suggests that the attenuation of PKCε expression in rats treated with antisense oligonucleotides is due to an RNase H-catalyzed degradation of PKCε mRNA.69,70 Finally, our behavioral data show that the knockdown of the PKCε expression in IB4-binding neurons can reverse hyperalgesic priming (Figure 4), a chronic pain phenotype known to be mediated by PKCε activity in non-peptidergic C-fiber nociceptors.9,10,12 This demonstrates that ligand-conjugated streptavidin can be used to selectively transfect target cells with biotinylated antisense oligonucleotides, and a similar approach using a lectin- or antibody-conjugated streptavidin could also be used for the regulation of proteins in other subpopulations of nociceptors.

Here, we used streptavidin instead of avidin to conjugate with IB4. The rationale for this is, that others have previously used streptavidin-conjugated ligands 56 and antibodies 71 to successfully transfect cells with biotinylated oligonucleotides, and the binding of biotin to streptavidin is pH dependent, 67 while the binding of biotin to avidin is itself surprisingly stable under acidic and alkaline conditions.67,68 One of the major challenges in developing oligonucleotide-based therapies is solving the problem of endosomal escape.48,72,73 All oligonucleotides, whether unconjugated, bound to plasma proteins, or as part of a ligand-conjugated complex, are taken up by cells through endocytosis and thus enter membrane-bound vesicles from which they must escape to fulfill their function. The mechanisms by which oligonucleotides escape from endosomes are still not fully understood.72,74 However, it is known that the internal milieu of endosomes acidifies over time, which, for example, contributes to the breakdown of ligand-receptor complexes into their components. Given that the affinity of streptavidin for biotin decreases dramatically with decreasing pH, 67 we chose to bind IB4 to streptavidin.

Ligand-conjugated oligonucleotides offer several significant advantages over unconjugated oligonucleotides. They have a much higher selectivity and are taken up by cells much more effectively.44,46,55 Both factors not only reduce the risk of unwanted side effects, but also allow a significant reduction in the doses needed for a successful knockdown. For example, in this study we used only intrathecal injections of 0.78 µg antisense ODN/dose, while our laboratory typically uses intrathecal injections of between 40 and 120 µg antisense ODN/dose for knockdowns with comparable potency.75,76 However, a fundamental problem in using ligand-conjugated oligonucleotides is the identification of cell surface molecules that are specific to the target cells since most cell surface molecules are not expressed by only one cell type. This also explains why the development of ligand-conjugated oligonucleotides is so challenging and so far, only a few drugs based on ligand-conjugated oligonucleotides have been approved by the FDA.42,77,78

In summary, we report the successful use of streptavidin-conjugated IB4 to selectively transfect a subset of small-diameter nociceptors, the IB4-binding C-fibers, with biotinylated antisense oligonucleotides for PKCε. Our results provide proof of concept for the regulation of target molecules in other populations of DRG neurons.

Footnotes

Author notes: Dedicated to the memory of Prof. Dr Ferdinand Hucho.

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (grant no. R01AR075334) and Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute (grant no. NIH R01CA250017). The NIH had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. Furthermore, the content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the NIH.

ORCID iDs

Oliver Bogen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4731-4413

Jon D Levine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0681-5545

References

  • 1.Dubin AE, Patapoutian A. Nociceptors: the sensors of the pain pathway. J Clin Invest 2010; 120: 3760–3772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Basbaum AI, Jessel TM. Pain. In: Kandel ERSJH, Jessell TM, Siegelbaum SA, Hudspeth AJ, Mack S. (eds). Principles of neural science. New York: McGraw Hill, 2014, pp. 530–555. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Snider WD, McMahon SB. Tackling pain at the source: new ideas about nociceptors. Neuron 1998; 20: 629–632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Galili U, Shohet SB, Kobrin E, Stults CL, Macher BA. Man, apes, and old world monkeys differ from other mammals in the expression of alpha-galactosyl epitopes on nucleated cells. J Biol Chem 1988; 263: 17755–17762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gerke MB, Plenderleith MB. Binding sites for the plant lectin Bandeiraea simplicifolia I-isolectin B(4) are expressed by nociceptive primary sensory neurones. Brain Res 2001; 911: 101–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bogen O, Bender O, Löwe J, Blenau W, Thevis B, Schröder W, Margolis RU, Levine JD, Hucho F. Neuronally produced versican V2 renders C-fiber nociceptors IB4 -positive. J Neurochem 2015; 134: 147–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hayes CE, Goldstein IJ. An alpha-D-galactosyl-binding lectin from Bandeiraea simplicifolia seeds. Isolation by affinity chromatography and characterization. J Biol Chem 1974; 249: 1904–1914. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bogen O, Dreger M, Gillen C, Schröder W, Hucho F. Identification of versican as an isolectin B4-binding glycoprotein from mammalian spinal cord tissue. FEBS J 2005; 272: 1090–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Parada CA, Yeh JJ, Reichling DB, Levine JD. Transient attenuation of protein kinase Cepsilon can terminate a chronic hyperalgesic state in the rat. Neuroscience 2003; 120: 219–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ferrari LF, Bogen O, Levine JD. Nociceptor subpopulations involved in hyperalgesic priming. Neuroscience 2010; 165: 896–901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Joseph EK, Levine JD. Hyperalgesic priming is restricted to isolectin B4-positive nociceptors. Neuroscience 2010; 169: 431–435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bogen O, Alessandri-Haber N, Chu C, Gear RW, Levine JD. Generation of a pain memory in the primary afferent nociceptor triggered by PKCε activation of CPEB. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 2018–2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reichling DB, Levine JD. Critical role of nociceptor plasticity in chronic pain. Trends Neurosci 2009; 32: 611–618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kandasamy R, Price TJ. The pharmacology of nociceptor priming. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2015; 227: 15–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Aley KO, Messing RO, Mochly-Rosen D, Levine JD. Chronic hypersensitivity for inflammatory nociceptor sensitization mediated by the epsilon isozyme of protein kinase C. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 4680–4685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Khasar SG, Burkham J, Dina OA, Brown AS, Bogen O, Alessandri-Haber N, Green PG, Reichling DB, Levine JD. Stress induces a switch of intracellular signaling in sensory neurons in a model of generalized pain. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 5721–5730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Eijkelkamp N, Wang H, Garza-Carbajal A, Willemen HL, Zwartkruis FJ, Wood JN, Dantzer R, Kelley KW, Heijnen CJ, Kavelaars A. Low nociceptor GRK2 prolongs prostaglandin E2 hyperalgesia via biased cAMP signaling to Epac/Rap1, protein kinase Cepsilon, and MEK/ERK. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 12806–12815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang H, Heijnen CJ, van Velthoven CT, Willemen HL, Ishikawa Y, Zhang X, Sood AK, Vroon A, Eijkelkamp N, Kavelaars A. Balancing GRK2 and EPAC1 levels prevents and relieves chronic pain. J Clin Invest 2013; 123: 5023–5034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kitchener PD, Wilson P, Snow PJ. Selective labelling of primary sensory afferent terminals in lamina II of the dorsal horn by injection of Bandeiraea simplicifolia isolectin B4 into peripheral nerves. Neuroscience 1993; 54: 545–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang H, Rivero-Melián C, Robertson B, Grant G. Transganglionic transport and binding of the isolectin B4 from Griffonia simplicifolia I in rat primary sensory neurons. Neuroscience 1994; 62: 539–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vulchanova L, Olson TH, Stone LS, Riedl MS, Elde R, Honda CN. Cytotoxic targeting of isolectin IB4-binding sensory neurons. Neuroscience 2001; 108: 143–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bogen O, Dina OA, Gear RW, Levine JD. Dependence of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 induced hyperalgesia on the isolectin B4-binding protein versican. Neuroscience 2009; 159: 780–786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ye Y, Dang D, Viet CT, Dolan JC, Schmidt BL. Analgesia targeting IB4-positive neurons in cancer-induced mechanical hypersensitivity. J Pain 2012; 13: 524–531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pinto LG, Souza GR, Kusuda R, Lopes AH, Sant’Anna MB, Cunha FQ, Ferreira SH, Cunha TM. Non-peptidergic nociceptive neurons are essential for mechanical inflammatory hypersensitivity in mice. Mol Neurobiol 2019; 56: 5715–5728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Levine JD, Taiwo YO. Involvement of the mu-opiate receptor in peripheral analgesia. Neuroscience 1989; 32: 571–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Araldi D, Bogen O, Green PG, Levine JD. Role of nociceptor toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in opioid-induced hyperalgesia and hyperalgesic priming. J Neurosci 2019; 39: 6414–6424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dorn GW, Souroujon MC, Liron T, Chen CH, Gray MO, Zhou HZ, Csukai M, Wu G, Lorenz JN, Mochly-Rosen D. Sustained in vivo cardiac protection by a rationally designed peptide that causes epsilon protein kinase C translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 12798–12803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Taiwo YO, Levine JD. Further confirmation of the role of adenyl cyclase and of cAMP-dependent protein kinase in primary afferent hyperalgesia. Neuroscience 1991; 44: 131–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Papir-Kricheli D, Frey J, Laufer R, Gilon C, Chorev M, Selinger Z, Devor M. Behavioural effects of receptor-specific substance P agonists. Pain 1987; 31: 263–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mestre C, Pélissier T, Fialip J, Wilcox G, Eschalier A. A method to perform direct transcutaneous intrathecal injection in rats. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 1994; 32: 197–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alvarez P, Bogen O, Green PG, Levine JD. Nociceptor interleukin 10 receptor 1 is critical for muscle analgesia induced by repeated bouts of eccentric exercise in the rat. Pain 2017; 158: 1481–1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 2008; 3: 1101–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kitchener PD, Wilson P, Snow PJ. Selective labelling of primary sensory afferent terminals in lamina II of the dorsal horn by injection of Bandeiraea simplicifolia isolectin B4 into peripheral nerves. Neuroscience 1993; 54: 545–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fang X, Djouhri L, McMullan S, Berry C, Waxman SG, Okuse K, Lawson SN. Intense isolectin-B4 binding in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons distinguishes C-fiber nociceptors with broad action potentials and high Nav1.9 expression. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 7281–7292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Corder G, Castro DC, Bruchas MR, Scherrer G. Endogenous and exogenous opioids in pain. Annu Rev Neurosci 2018; 41: 453–473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Volkow N, Benveniste H, McLellan AT. Use and misuse of opioids in chronic pain. Annu Rev Med 2018; 69: 451–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kurreck J. Antisense and RNA interference approaches to target validation in pain research. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 2004; 7: 179–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sarret P, Doré-Savard L, Beaudet N. Direct application of siRNA for in vivo pain research. Methods Mol Biol 2010; 623: 383–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kaur IP, Sharma G. siRNA: a new approach to target neuropathic pain. BioDrugs 2012; 26: 401–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mohan A, Fitzsimmons B, Zhao HT, Jiang Y, Mazur C, Swayze EE, Kordasiewicz HB. Antisense oligonucleotides selectively suppress target RNA in nociceptive neurons of the pain system and can ameliorate mechanical pain. Pain 2018; 159: 139–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dong Y, Siegwart DJ, Anderson DG. Strategies, design, and chemistry in siRNA delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2019; 144: 133–147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hu B, Zhong L, Weng Y, Peng L, Huang Y, Zhao Y, Liang XJ. Therapeutic siRNA: state of the art. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2020; 5: 101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bennett CF, Kordasiewicz HB, Cleveland DW. Antisense drugs make sense for neurological diseases. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2021; 61: 831–852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Juliano RL. The delivery of therapeutic oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44: 6518–6548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Crooke ST, Wang S, Vickers TA, Shen W, Liang XH. Cellular uptake and trafficking of antisense oligonucleotides. Nat Biotechnol 2017; 35: 230–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xia X, Pollock N, Zhou J, Rossi J. Tissue-specific delivery of oligonucleotides. Methods Mol Biol 2019; 2036: 17–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Alshaer W, Zureigat H, Al Karaki A, Al-Kadash A, Gharaibeh L, Hatmal MM, Aljabali AAA, Awidi A. siRNA: mechanism of action, challenges, and therapeutic approaches. Eur J Pharmacol 2021; 905: 174178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dowdy SF. Overcoming cellular barriers for RNA therapeutics. Nat Biotechnol 2017; 35: 222–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lai J, Gold MS, Kim CS, Bian D, Ossipov MH, Hunter JC, Porreca F. Inhibition of neuropathic pain by decreased expression of the tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channel, NaV1.8. Pain 2002; 95: 143–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Marger F, Gelot A, Alloui A, Matricon J, Ferrer JF, Barrère C, Pizzoccaro A, Muller E, Nargeot J, Snutch TP, Eschalier A, Bourinet E, Ardid D. T-type calcium channels contribute to colonic hypersensitivity in a rat model of irritable bowel syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108: 11268–11273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Conner LB, Alvarez P, Bogen O, Levine JD. Role of Kv4.3 in vibration-induced muscle pain in the rat. J Pain 2016; 17: 444–450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Luo X, Fitzsimmons B, Mohan A, Zhang L, Terrando N, Kordasiewicz H, Ji RR. Intrathecal administration of antisense oligonucleotide against p38α but not p38β MAP kinase isoform reduces neuropathic and postoperative pain and TLR4-induced pain in male mice. Brain Behav Immun 2018; 72: 34–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang J, Rong L, Shao J, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhao S, Li L, Yu W, Zhang M, Ren X, Zhao Q, Zhu C, Luo H, Zang W, Cao J. Epigenetic restoration of voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.2 alleviates nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain. J Neurochem 2021; 156: 367–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhu X, Xie W, Zhang J, Strong JA, Zhang JM. Sympathectomy decreases pain behaviors and nerve regeneration by downregulating monocyte chemokine CCL2 in dorsal root ganglia in the rat tibial nerve crush model. Pain 2022; 163: e106–e120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Winkler J. Oligonucleotide conjugates for therapeutic applications. Ther Deliv 2013; 4: 791–809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chu TC, Twu KY, Ellington AD, Levy M. Aptamer mediated siRNA delivery. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34: e73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Alam MR, Ming X, Fisher M, Lackey JG, Rajeev KG, Manoharan M, Juliano RL. Multivalent cyclic RGD conjugates for targeted delivery of small interfering RNA. Bioconjug Chem 2011; 22: 1673–1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Alam MR, Ming X, Nakagawa O, Jin J, Juliano RL. Covalent conjugation of oligonucleotides with cell-targeting ligands. Bioorg Med Chem 2013; 21: 6217–6223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Prakash TP, Graham MJ, Yu J, Carty R, Low A, Chappell A, Schmidt K, Zhao C, Aghajan M, Murray HF, Riney S, Booten SL, Murray SF, Gaus H, Crosby J, Lima WF, Guo S, Monia BP, Swayze EE, Seth PP. Targeted delivery of antisense oligonucleotides to hepatocytes using triantennary N-acetyl galactosamine improves potency 10-fold in mice. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42: 8796–8807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ämmälä C, Drury WJ, Knerr L, Ahlstedt I, Stillemark-Billton P, Wennberg-Huldt C, Andersson EM, Valeur E, Jansson-Löfmark R, Janzén D, Sundström L, Meuller J, Claesson J, Andersson P, Johansson C, Lee RG, Prakash TP, Seth PP, Monia BP, Andersson S. Targeted delivery of antisense oligonucleotides to pancreatic β-cells. Sci Adv 2018; 4: eaat3386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Harumoto T, Iwai H, Tanigawa M, Kubo T, Atsumi T, Tsutsumi K, Takashima M, Destito G, Soloff R, Tomizuka K, Nycholat C, Paulson J, Uehara K. Enhancement of gene knockdown on CD22-expressing cells by chemically modified glycan ligand-siRNA conjugates. ACS Chem Biol 2022; 17: 292–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Joseph EK, Chen X, Bogen O, Levine JD. Oxaliplatin acts on IB4-positive nociceptors to induce an oxidative stress-dependent acute painful peripheral neuropathy. J Pain 2008; 9: 463–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang R, Guo W, Ossipov MH, Vanderah TW, Porreca F, Lai J. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor normalizes neurochemical changes in injured dorsal root ganglion neurons and prevents the expression of experimental neuropathic pain. Neuroscience 2003; 121: 815–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Streit WJ, Schulte BA, Balentine DJ, Spicer SS. Histochemical localization of galactose-containing glycoconjugates in sensory neurons and their processes in the central and peripheral nervous system of the rat. J Histochem Cytochem 1985; 33: 1042–1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fullmer JM, Riedl M, Williams FG, Sandrin M, Elde R. Enzymes that synthesize the IB4 epitope are not sufficient to impart IB4 binding in dorsal root ganglia of rat. J Comp Neurol 2007; 501: 70–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Price TJ, Flores CM. Critical evaluation of the colocalization between calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P, transient receptor potential vanilloid subfamily type 1 immunoreactivities, and isolectin B4 binding in primary afferent neurons of the rat and mouse. J Pain 2007; 8: 263–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Weber PC, Ohlendorf DH, Wendoloski JJ, Salemme FR. Structural origins of high-affinity biotin binding to streptavidin. Science 1989; 243: 85–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Green NM. Avidin and streptavidin. Methods Enzymol 1990; 184: 51–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Walder RY, Walder JA. Role of RNase H in hybrid-arrested translation by antisense oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988; 85: 5011–5015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Crooke ST. Antisense strategies. Curr Mol Med 2004; 4: 465–487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Xia CF, Boado RJ, Pardridge WM. Antibody-mediated targeting of siRNA via the human insulin receptor using avidin-biotin technology. Mol Pharm 2009; 6: 747–751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Juliano RL. Intracellular trafficking and endosomal release of oligonucleotides: what we know and what we don’t. Nucleic Acid Ther 2018; 28: 166–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Guo S, Zhang M, Huang Y. Three ‘E’ challenges for siRNA drug development. Trends Mol Med 2023; 30: 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Dowdy SF. Endosomal escape of RNA therapeutics: how do we solve this rate-limiting problem. RNA 2023; 29: 396–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Summer GJ, Romero-Sandoval EA, Bogen O, Dina OA, Khasar SG, Levine JD. Proinflammatory cytokines mediating burn-injury pain. Pain 2008; 135: 98–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Araldi D, Khomula EV, Bonet IJM, Bogen O, Green PG, Levine JD. Role of pattern recognition receptors in chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. Brain. 2023; 147(3): awad339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Al Shaer D, Al Musaimi O, Albericio F, de la Torre BG. FDA TIDES (peptides and oligonucleotides) harvest. Pharmaceuticals 2022; 15: 222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.de la Torre BG, Albericio F. The pharmaceutical industry in 2022: an analysis of FDA drug approvals from the perspective of molecules. Molecules 2023; 28: 1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Molecular Pain are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES