IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v192y2025ics0965856424004063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A user behavior and reinforcement learning based dynamic pricing method for idle connection time reduction at charging stations

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Xizhen
  • Cai, Yutong
  • Meng, Qiang
  • Ji, Yanjie

Abstract

Reducing idle connection time is crucial for improving the operational efficiency of charging stations and enhancing the satisfaction of electric vehicle (EV) users. During idle connection time, EVs occupy charging spots without actively charging, thus preventing other vehicles from accessing them. However, there has been limited research focusing on how to shorten the idle connection time of charging stations. This study employed a stated preference survey to develop four separate logit models within the framework of mixed logit model that examines the impact of pricing strategies on the choice behavior of idle connection time and the underlying mechanisms behind drivers’ choice behavior in various durations of idle connection time (brief, moderate, lengthy, and extra-lengthy). Taking a charging station in Suzhou, China as a case study area, we developed a dynamic pricing algorithm based on Deep Q-Network reinforcement learning and choice behavior to minimize idle connection time and pricing at the charging station. The results indicate that factors such as pricing, location, charging start time, and the search time for available parking spaces have a significant impact on reducing idle connection time. Additionally, such impact varies across different durations of idle connection time, and the dynamic pricing strategy proves to be effective in reducing idle connection time. Compared to fixed pricing and semi-fixed pricing strategies, the dynamic pricing strategy can accommodate more potential charging demands at lower fee rates. The findings of this study offer valuable insights and a theoretical foundation for the real-time proactive management of EV charging stations.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Xizhen & Cai, Yutong & Meng, Qiang & Ji, Yanjie, 2025. "A user behavior and reinforcement learning based dynamic pricing method for idle connection time reduction at charging stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0965856424004063
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424004063
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    --->

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Motoaki, Yutaka & Shirk, Matthew G., 2017. "Consumer behavioral adaption in EV fast charging through pricing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 178-183.
    2. Faria, Marta V. & Baptista, Patrícia C. & Farias, Tiago L., 2014. "Electric vehicle parking in European and American context: Economic, energy and environmental analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 110-121.
    3. Emily Lancsar & Jordan Louviere, 2006. "Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(8), pages 797-811, August.
    4. Shoup, Donald, 2021. "Pricing curb parking," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 399-412.
    5. Mingardo, Giuliano & Vermeulen, Susan & Bornioli, Anna, 2022. "Parking pricing strategies and behaviour: Evidence from the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 185-197.
    6. Chen, Yu & Lin, Boqiang, 2022. "Are consumers in China’s major cities happy with charging infrastructure for electric vehicles?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    7. Solvi Hoen, Fredrik & Díez-Gutiérrez, María & Babri, Sahar & Hess, Stephane & Tørset, Trude, 2023. "Charging electric vehicles on long trips and the willingness to pay to reduce waiting for charging. Stated preference survey in Norway," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Wolbertus, Rick & Kroesen, Maarten & van den Hoed, Robert & Chorus, Caspar, 2018. "Fully charged: An empirical study into the factors that influence connection times at EV-charging stations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-7.
    9. Zhou, Xizhen & Lv, Mengqi & Ji, Yanjie & Zhang, Shuichao & Liu, Yong, 2023. "Pricing curb parking: Differentiated parking fees or cash rewards?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 46-58.
    10. Siddique, Choudhury & Afifah, Fatima & Guo, Zhaomiao & Zhou, Yan, 2022. "Data mining of plug-in electric vehicles charging behavior using supply-side data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Volodymyr Mnih & Koray Kavukcuoglu & David Silver & Andrei A. Rusu & Joel Veness & Marc G. Bellemare & Alex Graves & Martin Riedmiller & Andreas K. Fidjeland & Georg Ostrovski & Stig Petersen & Charle, 2015. "Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 518(7540), pages 529-533, February.
    12. Hensher,David A. & Rose,John M. & Greene,William H., 2015. "Applied Choice Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107465923, Enero-Abr.
    13. Zhang, Rong & Zhu, Lichao, 2016. "Curbside parking pricing in a city centre using a threshold," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 16-27.
    14. Lu, Tianwei & Yao, Enjian & Jin, Fanglei & Yang, Yang, 2022. "Analysis of incentive policies for electric vehicle adoptions after the abolishment of purchase subsidy policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    15. Nourinejad, Mehdi & Roorda, Matthew J., 2017. "Impact of hourly parking pricing on travel demand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 28-45.
    16. Ton, Danique & Duives, Dorine C. & Cats, Oded & Hoogendoorn-Lanser, Sascha & Hoogendoorn, Serge P., 2019. "Cycling or walking? Determinants of mode choice in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 7-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Çakıl, Fatih & Aksoy, Necati, 2025. "Reinforcement learning-based multi-objective smart energy management for electric vehicle charging stations with priority scheduling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhuang, Zheng-Yun & Chung, Cheng-Kung, 2024. "Dissecting the visiting willingness of driving visitors facing a retail market's dual-pricing policy for parking," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Zhang, Xinying & Pitera, Kelly & Wang, Yuanqing, 2024. "Exploring parking choices under the coexistence of autonomous and conventional vehicles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 636(C).
    3. Nasrin Tayyari Dehbarez & Morten Raun Mørkbak & Dorte Gyrd-Hansen & Niels Uldbjerg & Rikke Søgaard, 2018. "Women’s Preferences for Birthing Hospital in Denmark: A Discrete Choice Experiment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 11(6), pages 613-624, December.
    4. Kappenberger, Jakob & Stuckenschmidt, Heiner & Gerdon, Frederic, 2025. "Pricing parking for fairness — A simulation study based on an empirically calibrated model of parking behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Peyron, Christine & Pélissier, Aurore & Béjean, Sophie, 2018. "Preference heterogeneity with respect to whole genome sequencing. A discrete choice experiment among parents of children with rare genetic diseases," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 125-132.
    6. Parmar, Janak & Saiyed, Gulnazbanu & Dave, Sanjaykumar, 2023. "Analysis of taste heterogeneity in commuters’ travel decisions using joint parking– and mode–choice model: A case from urban India," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Eliasson, Jonas & Börjesson, Maria, 2022. "Costs and benefits of parking charges in residential areas," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 95-109.
    8. Dave, Sanjaykumar M. & Joshi, Gaurang J. & Ravinder, Kayitha & Gore, Ninad, 2019. "Data monitoring for the assessment of on-street parking demand in CBD areas of developing countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 152-171.
    9. Feng, Zhongxiang & Gao, Ya & Zhu, Dianchen & Chan, Ho-Yin & Zhao, Mingming & Xue, Rui, 2024. "Impact of risk perception and trust in autonomous vehicles on pedestrian crossing decision: Navigating the social-technological intersection with the ICLV model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 71-86.
    10. Bjørnåvold, Amalie & David, Maia & Bohan, David A. & Gibert, Caroline & Rousselle, Jean-Marc & Van Passel, Steven, 2022. "Why does France not meet its pesticide reduction targets? Farmers' socio-economic trade-offs when adopting agro-ecological practices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    11. Budnitz, Hannah & Meelen, Toon & Schwanen, Tim, 2022. "Residential Neighbourhood Charging of Electric Vehicles: an exploration of user preferences," SocArXiv fsv7n, Center for Open Science.
    12. Jun Li & Sifan Wu & Xiaoman Feng, 2021. "Optimization of On-Street Parking Charges Based on Price Elasticity of the Expected Perceived Parking Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    13. Kotu, Bekele Hundie & Oyinbo, Oyakhilomen & Hoeschle-Zeledon, Irmgard & Nurudeen, Abdul Rahman & Kizito, Fred & Boyubie, Benedict, 2022. "Smallholder farmers’ preferences for sustainable intensification attributes in maize production: Evidence from Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    14. Wolbertus, Rick & Kroesen, Maarten & van den Hoed, Robert & Chorus, Caspar, 2018. "Fully charged: An empirical study into the factors that influence connection times at EV-charging stations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-7.
    15. Lv, Shengnan & Xiao, Anran & Qin, Yong & Xu, Zeshui & Wang, Xinxin, 2024. "A decision framework for improving the service quality of charging stations based on online reviews and evolutionary game theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    16. Mina Bahrampour & Joshua Byrnes & Richard Norman & Paul A. Scuffham & Martin Downes, 2020. "Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(7), pages 983-992, September.
    17. Steffen Limmer, 2019. "Dynamic Pricing for Electric Vehicle Charging—A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Abdelghaffar, Hossam M. & Batista, S.F.A. & Rehman, Abdur & Cao, Jin & Menéndez, Mónica & Jabari, Saif Eddin, 2024. "Comparison of probabilistic cruising-for-parking time estimation models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Hui Bi & Zhirui Ye & He Zhu, 2024. "Mining bike sharing trip record data: a closer examination of the operating performance at station level," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1015-1041, June.
    20. Chorus, Caspar G. & Pudāne, Baiba & Mouter, Niek & Campbell, Danny, 2018. "Taboo trade-off aversion: A discrete choice model and empirical analysis," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 37-49.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0965856424004063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.