Snow Leopard review

But underneath the customary OS X fit and finish there's a lot of new plumbing at work here. The entire OS is now 64-bit, meaning apps can address massive amounts of RAM and other tasks go much faster. The Finder has been entirely re-written in Cocoa, which Mac fans have been clamoring for since 10.0. There's a new version of QuickTime, which affects media playback on almost every level of the system. And on top of all that, there's now Exchange support in Mail, iCal, and Address Book, making OS X finally play nice with corporate networks out of the box.
So you won't notice much new when you first restart into 10.6 -- apart from some minor visual tweaks here and there there's just not that much that stands out. But in a way that means the pressure's on even more: Apple took the unusual and somewhat daring step of slowing feature creep in a major OS to focus on speed, reliability, and stability, and if Snow Leopard doesn't deliver on those fronts, it's not worth $30... it's not worth anything. So did Apple pull it off? Read on to find out!
Installation

Installation itself took about 45 minutes on most of the machines we tried, although we did run into some snags once things were complete. We didn't have any problems with the more pristine MacBook Pros in our fleet, but one of our production machines is a cranky older iMac that's been in constant use for over two years without a system rebuild, and when it restarted the desktop pictures were all set to the defaults, the System Preferences app wouldn't launch from the Apple Menu, our MobileMe sync states were a little confused and Spotlight began reindexing all the external drives. Fixing these problems didn't take much, but if your machine is already acting up don't expect everything to go perfectly.
Other installation notes: We were promised 6GB of storage savings with 10.6, and Apple more than delivered -- we got anywhere from 10GB to a whopping 20GB back after installation. Rosetta is no longer installed by default, so if you're still rocking some legacy non-Universal apps you'll want to make sure and install it. Printer driver installation is much smarter, installing drivers only for those printers you've used in the past and printers that appear on your local network. We have no idea why Apple continues to insist on installing language translations by default, but they're much smaller now at 250MB.
Overall, installing Snow Leopard is just like installing any other major OS update: it works great, except when it doesn't. The process itself is fine (in fact, Apple has even built in some safeguards to let you pick up an install if your computer dies or is shut off half way through), but it's the little kinks you have to work out afterwards that can be tricky. If you haven't loaded up your system with hacks and tweaks chances are you'll be fine -- and if you're living on the edge, well, you're probably used to doing some extra work around upgrade time.
UI enhancements
Dock Expose

Stacks
We've never been huge users of the Stacks feature, but it's been tweaked and is much more usable in 10.6 -- as long as you're using grid view, which is now scrollable and offers the ability to drill down into folders just like a Finder window. All the other views are essentially the same -- and for whatever reason, dragging a file onto a stack icon doesn't open the stack, but instead opens a Finder window. While we're on the subject of folders in the dock, explain this nonsensical operation to us: command-clicking a stack icon doesn't open the folder (as you might expect), but instead pops open the enclosing folder. This counter-intuitive (and frankly frustrating) glitch has been around since Tiger -- and we have no idea why. Here's some video:
Finder file previews
We'll get to the big Finder changes shortly -- the Cocoa rewrite definitely improved things -- but the big UI tweak here is live file previews. That means you can watch a video, flip through a document, and generally peek at things without having to open an app or even hit the space bar for Quick Look. It's quite handy -- but again, not earth-shattering.

Finder file previews
We'll get to the big Finder changes shortly -- the Cocoa rewrite definitely improved things -- but the big UI tweak here is live file previews. That means you can watch a video, flip through a document, and generally peek at things without having to open an app or even hit the space bar for Quick Look. It's quite handy -- but again, not earth-shattering.
Notable app changes
Finder

QuickTime X

That said, there are some notable changes with QuickTime Player: there's a new screen recording tool (we made all the videos in this post with it), you can record right off your built-in iSight, and there's a new iPhone 3GS-like "Trim" tool to cut your videos fast.
That glossy title might come at a steep price for some of us -- at least at first glance. QuickTime Player X has certainly added some welcome new options for most, but for QuickTime 7 Pro users, things get a little confusing. If you've already got Pro on your system and do a straight install, you'll end up with the standard new QuickTime -- which means a lot of what you're used to will be missing. Hell, there isn't even a preferences dialog -- so say goodbye to presenting movies on a different monitor, or choosing a default full screen setting. The changes also means that you can't do quick'n'dirty edits by copy-and-pasting anymore (a favorite of Engadget editors), and export options have been reduced to presets for iPhone, iPod, Apple TV, MobileMe, and YouTube.
On top of that, some QuickTime-dependent apps seem like they need a rewrite to work correctly -- we couldn't get our Turbo.264 HD stick to function, and other QuickTime programs we tried seemed similarly stressed. Oh, and those screen recordings? They're encoded with some combination of H.264 and AAC audio that didn't play nice with Viddler out of the box -- and YouTube's uploader refused to load under Snow Leopard (we had a number of server errors), so we ended up uploading all these screencasts from a Windows machine. That may not be the case for all, but it was for us.
This won't be too much of an issue for users who are sticking with the basic QuickTime functionality, but for those of us who've become accustomed to Pro, it may be a little shock. Interestingly, Apple let us know that you can actually re-install QuickTime 7 Pro from the Snow Leopard disc (and from your Utilities folder, oddly), but if you hop right into a standard upgrade, it's amazingly easy to miss (we did on multiple systems).
Safari 4
If you're thinking of upgrading to Snow Leopard on day one, chances are you're already running Safari 4, since it's been available since June. The big changes in 10.6 are (obviously) 64-bit support, which here translates into much faster Javascript performance, and a new browser plugin architecture that runs individual plugins as separate instances. That means if a plugin like Flash crashes it won't take the whole app down with it, but sadly, we weren't able to test it -- for maybe the first time ever, we couldn't crash a browser. Hopefully our good luck rubs off on you.
Exchange

Compatibility
Here's where it gets a little rough. Although Snow Leopard is ostensibly just a polish and repair job on Leopard, there've been enough changes under the hood so that plenty of things are likely to break -- or at least not play nice. As with the installation, if you're running a stock or close-to-stock system, you probably won't run into any problems, but if you've got a setup as tweaked as most of those in the Engadget labs, you're going to run into some issues.

We also noticed problems with old standbys like Growl, GrabUp and Skitch -- really clutch go-to applications that seemed to buckle under the 64-bit noise. Although we could start them in 32-bit mode, nothing seemed to work exactly right, and we're pretty sure we spotted Growl making off with a ton of free memory when we weren't looking. We also had trouble getting our Sprint Novatel U727 3G stick working, although our Verizon card was fine. Again, we're sure all of this is going to be updated, but if you're like us, the bugginess will prove maddening at times -- enough to make us consider waiting out the upgrade on some of our other machines.
There were some other head scratchers we saw on various systems, too. On a 17-inch unibody we were putting through the paces, the WiFi inexplicably has gone out and we have yet to get it working again. On a 15-inch, older generation MacBook Pro (3,1), Spotlight will only fetch search results in the dropdown -- results in a Finder window come up empty. More annoyingly, on two other, newer models we were testing with, Safari crashes out when booting into 32-bit mode -- meaning even Apple's workaround doesn't seem to... er, work.
That's the bad news, though. The good news is that almost all of our regular, non-plugin, non-third-party-framework, non-hack apps worked just fine. Office, Photoshop CS3 and CS4, Tweetie, Firefox 3.5, Ableton, Fluid -- you name it, it ran without a problem. Like we said, if you're running things close to stock you're going to be fine, but we tend to kit out our rigs with a ton of little hacks to really speed up our workflow, and that's the stuff that's broken in Snow Leopard. It's up to you to decide where on that line you fall before you commit to the upgrade.
Overall speed and stability
Compatibility with our various hackeriffic plugins aside, we found Snow Leopard to be just as stable and free from major hang-ups as Leopard. That cranky iMac we installed it on seemed to perk up a little, and while we don't think anything will ever make Firefox feel perfectly stable, we certainly didn't experience as many beachballs or other hangups while running 10.6. So yes, subjectively things seem fast and reliable, and the new Finder makes day-to-day usage seem positively zippy -- and the objective benchmarks tend to back that up.

As measured by XBench, Snow Leopard affects every Mac a little differently, but the basic outcome is the same: raw CPU performance goes up slightly, while the graphics numbers go down -- OpenGl performance in particular takes a big hit. We're not sure if this is due to our version of XBench not playing nicely with Snow Leopard or something else entirely, but we didn't notice any slowdowns while we actually worked -- or played a little casual CoD4. We're not deep into the benchmark scene, so we'd wait for some hardcore marks to hit before you race into fanboy battle with these numbers -- for now, just know that Snow Leopard certainly "feels" a little snappier than Leopard.
Wrap-up

Update: In the original version of the review we noted that QuickTime 7 Pro wasn't available for Snow Leopard. In fact, the software is available as a separate install on the disc itself and via the QuickTime 7 app in the Utilities folder.
First day purchase for me. Although I am really happy with it, hopefully it will help out my 3 year old MBP in speed.
I'm curious to hear how it turns out. I'm in the same situation with my MBP. Supposedly, SL will run in 32-bit mode on it but I'm wondering if there would be any performance difference to 10.5 in that case.
I would be upgrading, but I have 10.4, so I'd have to pay $115.... *sad panda*
You can buy the 29 version because it works as a clean install also. It's just the price for good will people.
I have one of the first-generation (Core Duo -- 32-bit) MacBook Pros, and Snow Leopard is VERY nice. The system feels a LOT faster, especially in the Finder. This is a worthwhile upgrade.
I've found that "ooVoo" and some menubar programs don't work properly under SL... yet. ooVoo has a Java problem; some of the menubar programs cause the entire menubar to crash (check the Console for error messages).
• you'll get 7+ GB reclaimed HDD space
• much more responsive Finder
• better Expose and Stacks
• GCD for advanced multiprocessing
• OpenCL for software that supports GPU offloading
• Native support for MS Exchange 2007
• virtually all apps and kernel operate in 64-bit mode (on capable machines; and this, technically is far superior to Vista x64 which is pretty good)
• QuicktimeX Pro
People paid $29 for Microsoft "Theme Packs" back in the day. Zero increased functionality or code refinements. Pure crap. $29 is a bargain one of Snow Leopard's features. And it has 100+ new refinements....
@ Heffeque
the 29 dollar version is not a full install it is an upgrade from leopard disc. You can not do a clean install with that disc unless you clean install leopard first. Thats why the mac box set is a real deal.
@Robert.
You are wrong. I was upgrading my hard drive anyway and did a clean install from the Snow Leopard DVD.
This is a private video. If you have been sent this video, please make sure you accept the sender's friend request.
In other words, we can't watch the videos.
We had a cache issue, but everything should be live now.
this may be $30 for 10.5. users but it's $170 for 10.4.11 users :( I was really hoping it would be $30 for all.
10.6 will install over 10.4,
it may not upgrade (yet to be determined?) may require a clean install but you were going to back-up first, right? so, migration assistant afterwards and you're all good.
it annoys me how I can always detect bias in engadget articles.
Majority of the editors are biased towards Macs including Nilay and Joshua, they try to keep it subtle but its there and its bull!
Do you guys get paid to do this or what?
Snow Leopard:
More* than just a Service Pack
*just a bit more
It's $170 for Tiger users but you also get iLife. So *everything* will be up to date.
Fez, in a review the reviewer will either like or dislike a product. Welcome to reality. That's the point of a review.
I think the final word was pretty middle of the road in not highly praising the update nor trashing it. You are hypersensitive if that was too biased for you.
I can see the videos all right, but to be honest it's rather hard to understand what's being said – at least for me, a nonnnative speaker. Somebody's got to work on his articulation, I'm afraid.
Nilay, Josh,
Care to throw some light on which Mac models can access which Snow Leopard features? I sent a tip to you, pointing to the handy chart put together by Stephen Foskett (and enhanced by Ed Bott of ZDNet) at:
http://blog.fosketts.net/2009/08/24/mac-os-106-snow-leopard-hands-august-28/
I am surprised you did not touch upon how older Macs are left out on some or most of the new features in Snow Leopard. I hope for objectivity's sake, you'd include this data as a PSA.
Snow Leopard is Awesome. I'm loving it since I installed it on my PC. Yes PC! Using OSx86 Guide available here http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1744
I upgraded from Leopard 10.5.4
Video is good and let's not bother about it.
Snow Leopard is Faster than Leopard. The proof is I upgraded to it from Leopard on my osx86 PC. Yes PC!
(if you are wondering how, here is the guide i used - http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1744 )
And I found it to be at-least 20% faster at all moments. And I love it.
Nice OS! I prefer Windows 7, but good OS none the less.
You are a rare individual indeed, we need more like you on Engadget. +1
I prefer Windows 7 too.
Well heres #2, hey, maybe we could start a cult :-P
i prefer windows 7 as well....but this still be a nice os but not enough to switch me over to apple completely... i use a mac at times.... but a windows pc i use a whole lot more.
I dunno, I'm dual booting both on a home built hackintosh.. Both have their pluses and minuses. I'd say for built in, company supported software, apple wins hands down. But, for overall usability and customization options (not to mention gaming) Windows takes the cake.
I enjoy using Mac OS X Snow Leopard mainly because as advertised things just work (even on a hackintosh.. mind you it took a lot to get it going). The software is really easy and attractive.
Going off on a bit of a tangent, what the hell is up with missing crap from windows 7? I can't even properly quick-fix my photos from windows image viewer anymore... I have to get live photo gallery or some crap? Why remove stuff?
@ ZZMitch
I was actually about to say the same thing. It's a great operating system....but it's still just not for me. Maybe. :P
@Andrei:
It's a whole online eco-system that Microsoft is creating, Windows Live, such as tagging people in photos and everybody can see them and stuff. I'm sure it has has to do with the EU, as well all know they like to try and destroy Microsoft by making them remove components of the OS.
er..... really. What does this review have to do with Windows 7? Yes, they are competitors, but so what...
There is a fair and ample amount of coverage of Windows 7 on Engadget. Personally, I've ran Win7 RC on my PC for awhile, and I won't be giving Apple $30 to upgrade my Mac to Snow Leopard. But talking about Windows 7 is mere fodder for flame-bait; and irrelevant to the subject at hand.
I've been running Snow Leopard for about 2 months now. using my developer build. Overall i really like it but i will agree for the geek Windows 7 is almost on the same level as OSX. I lean to OSX for things like Adium, Growl, aperture etc.. Mostly software. Games though... thats what Windows 7 is for and well yeah... Visual Studio lol.
@Temple:
How is talking about Windows 7 irrelevant? A new product comes out and people automatically compare it to what it's competing against. Do you expect people in a post about the Zune HD to say nothing about iPods? A X360 post to have nothing about the PS3? Do you not understand anything about personal opinions?
I love Win7 too, but I'd still like to try it out on a hackintosh partition. I already got 10.5.8 there :P why not 10.6
@cmsb55
It's 'irrelevant' because Windows vs Mac 'personal opinions' have never amounted to any level of intellectual conversation and always degrade to fanboi stupidity. Using your example. How often are Xbox vs Playstation fanboy conversations worth reading, or iPod vs Zune conversations? Never.
Why can't we talk about the product or review at hand for once without obvious stealth trolling. And this goes for both sides.
I really like the cover-flow preview feature in Finder. I wish MS would fix up their Explorer preview feature =(.
So let's say Win7 and 10.6 are equal. How much sway will a $29 price tag have?
$29 for a tiny upgrade...?
What the hell?
I like Win7RC but I missed the $50 upgrade window. I'm not paying full price for new OS. I may have to go back to my WinXP :(
So basically we get the same UNIX security (I hate UAC) with a zippier, more optimized graphics and codecs (it actually comes with a DVD codec out of the box, no thirdparty powerDVD or cyberlink crap crashing which is nice). Still has a universal spell checker in application windows from Safari to Mail, just faster. I like TimeMachine, it sure beats Microsoft's now dead OneCare.
Thats nice.
At $30, you can't even buy the extra crap needed to get other UNoperating systems to actually operate day-to-day with simple out of the box features humming along in 64bit mode, less you go Linux, but then again where's the support. I'll have to compare with Ubuntu's latest offerings. But $30 bucks!? Antivirus or (you can only pick one) EZ backup software addons aren't even that cheap.
Sounds nice over all.
@andrei & jordan
yeah, it has a lot to do with the EU. it's not a big deal though, i think they're all included in a Live Apps package that gets picked up by Windows Update.
I also prefer Windows 7, though I've already preordered Snow Leopard.
Once Windows 7 is released, I'll have a full retail copy of Windows 7 running under boot camp with Snow Leopard running as the normal OS on my Unibody MacBook Pro. It'll be nice to have both.
i agree i love windows 7 the one thing i wish windows had tht mac did was tht dock with all your applications on it tht seems very handy and more ideal than cluttering the desktop with icons. just my 2 cents tho....
You'll never get me using a Mac as my main OS, but I'll say this, this looks a fine bit of kit.
@win ftw?????
you know... you can delete those icons on your desktop. and if you've ever bothered to look a pic of Win7, you will see that you can load up the new taskbar with a larger version of all your program icons (just icons, no text), it's pretty similar to how OSX does it. of course you can turn that off and use the taskbar the old way too.
It does look nice, however I to prefer Windows 7 which is what will be getting installed on my Macbook as its primary OS. That doesn't mean OS X is bad - far from it - just that after using it for about six months it's really no better than Windows and less familiar.
Hey, it's me, not OS X.
@Mark Anderson
LOL, you have a MBP, but your going to forego the Optimized OS and Optimized Drivers for your hardware: read OpenGL drivers 'that just work' for Microsoft/thirdparty drivers.
Its pretty sad if Bootcamp driver's do a better job then the native OS drivers. But thats Windows, 'its open'. LOL
@ Steveorevo
Windows Vista and 7 both come with DVD codecs out of the box. I haven't used a third party DVD player software in years. If you choose to get Windows Live Mail, that come with spell checker as well as IE 8 and pretty much any other browser. Windows 7 Home Premium will also have Shadow Copy and it's own back up system software. So all the features are there. The one thing I would say is restoring files is not as easy with Shadow Copy than Time Machine simply because it isn't as easy to get to. However, once you know what to do it is pretty easy.
@Steve
Actually I'm going to forgo the 'optimised drivers' in favour 'applications I use that run better or indeed at all' under Windows.
Oh and, Steve, while we're at it...
Exactly what 'optimised drivers' are required for a Foxconn (or is it ASUS?) board, a standard Core 2 Duo, DDR3 RAM and an nVidia 9400M? You know, the same components you get in most high end notebooks?
Oh and it's a late 2008 unibody Macbook, not an MBP, plus, since we're being pedantic - and as you're the guy who always bitches about the lack of a spell checker in Windows I think we should be - it's "you're going" not "your going". Shame your platform doesn't have a grammar cheker, isn't it?
@Mark Anderson
If OS X is not as good as Windows then why buy a Macbook in the first place when you could buy a PC. You always keep saying how Mac are expensive.